Explaining the Factors Influencing Cellular Phones Use in Guinea

Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-7

  Kaba, Bangaly ^a   Diallo, Amadou ^a   Plaisent, Michel ^a   Bernard, Prosper ^a   N’Da, Koffi ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45949112258     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16814835     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/j.1681-4835.2006.tb00187.x     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anandarajan, M., M. Igbaria and U. P. Anakwe. 2002.«IT Acceptance in a less-developed Country: A motivational factor perspective». International journal of information management, vol. 22, p. 47–65.
2. Brilman, J. L'entreprise réinventée: Organisation par processus, structures plates, équipes en réseaux. Paris: Éditions d'organisation
3. Carlson, J. R. and R. W. Zmud. 1999. Channel expansion theory and the experiential nature of media richness perceptions. Academy of management journal, vol. 42, no. 2, p. 153–170
4. Cortina, J.M. 1993. «What is coefficient Alpha ? An examination of theory and Applications». Journal of applied psychology, vol. 78, p.98–104.
5. Davis, D. M. 1993. « Social impact of cellular phone usage in Hawaii». Actes de Conference Pacific telecommunication, vol. 2, p. 641–648.
6. Davis, F. D. 1989. «Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology». MIS Quarterly, septembre, vol.13, no. 3. p.318–343.
7. Davis, F. D. R. Bagozzi P. and P. R. Warshaw. 1989. «User acceptance of computer technology: a comparaison of two theoretechnologies de l'informational models». Management science, vol. 35. no. 8. p. 982–1003.
8. Fjermestad J. and S.R. Hiltz. 1998. Analysis of the Effects of Mode of Communication on Group Decision Making. Proceedings of the HICSS-31, Hawaii, vol. p. 17.
9. Igbaria, M. 1994. «An examination of the factors contributing to microcomputer technology acceptance ». Accounting, management and information technology, vol. 4, no. 4, p. 205–224.
10. Ishii, K. 2004. Internet use via mobile phone in Japan. Telecommunications policy, vol. 28. p. 43–58.
11. Karahanna, Elena and al. 1999. «Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparaison of pre-adoption and post adoption beliefs ». Mis quarterly, vol.23, no. 2, p.183–213.
12. Kwon, H.S. 1996. Adoption of cellular phone technologies and services: user perceptions and motivations in the United States (Hawaii) and South Korea. Thèse de doctorat Université de Hawaii.
13. Kwon, H.S. and L. Chidambaram, (2000). A test of the technology acceptance model: the case of cellular phone adoption. Proceedings of the HICSS34, Hawaii, janvier.
14. Limayem M., F. Bergeron, A. Richard. 1997. «Utilisation des messageries électroniques: mesures objectives versus mesures subjectives». Revue systèmes d'information et management, n°1, vol.2, p. 51–69.
15. Markus, M. L. 1987. «Toward a critechnologies de l'informational mass theory of interactive media: universal access, interdependance an diffusion». Communication research, vol.14, p.491–511.
16. Mathieson K., E. Peacock and W. W. Chin. 2001. «Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources». The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, vol. 32, no3, p. 86–112.
17. Mbarika, V. W. A. 2002. «Re-thinking information and communications technology policy focus on Internet versus teledensity diffusion for Africa's least developed countries». EJISDC, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 1–13.
18. Minges, M. 1999. «Mobile cellular communications in the Southern African region». Telecommunications Policy vol. 23 p.585–593.
19. Moore G.C. and I. Benbasat. 1991. «Development of an Instrument to Mesure the perception of Adopting an Information Technology Innovation». Information Systems Research Vol.2 no.3, p. 37–46.
20. Odedra, M. and al. 1993. « Subsaharan Africa: A technological desert ». Communication of the ACM, février, vol.36, no. 2, p.25–29.
21. Orlikowsky, W.J. 2000. «Using Technology and Constituing Structures: A Practechnologies de l'informatione Lens for studying technology in organizations». Organizational Sciences, Vol. 11, no. 4 p. 149–160.
22. Plant, S. 2001. On the mobile. The effects of mobile telephones on social and individual life. Research Report, Motorola, US.
23. Rogers, Everett M. 1995. Diffusion of innovation. 4ème édition. New York: the new press.
24. Stratopoulos, T. and B. Dehning. 2000. « Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox ?» Information & management, vol., 38, p. 103–117.
25. Tannenbeam, R. 1991. Cellular phones; A comparative analysis of their adoption and impacts, Mémoire de maîtrise, Université de Carleton.
26. Taylor, S and Todd, P.A. 1995. « Understanding Information Technology Usage: A Test of Competing Models ». Information Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 2, p. 91–108.
27. Teo, T.S.H., Lim, V.K.G. & Lai, R.Y.C. (1999). «Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation in Internet usage » OMEGA International Journal of Management Science, vol. 27 no. 1, p. 25–37.
28. Thompson, R.L., C.A. Higgins, and J.M. Howell. 1994. « Influence of experience on personal computer utilization: Testing a conceptual model». Journal of management information systems, Vol. 11, n°1, Eté, p.167–187.
29. Triandis, H. C. 1980. Values attitudes and interpersonal behavior, Nebraska Symposium on motivation, 1979: Beliefs, Attitudes, and values. Lincoln, NE, University of Nebraska press, p. 195–259.
30. (UNDP). 2003. Rapport mondial sur le développement humain. Bruxelles: De Boeck Université