A robust brain deformation framework based on a finite element model in IGNS

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 146-157

  Liu, Yixun ^a   Song, Zhijian ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Brain deformation; FEM; IGNS; Linear elastic model; Mesh

Indexed keywords

DEFORMATION; MAMMALS; NEUROSURGERY;

BRAIN DEFORMATIONS; BRAIN SURFACE; FINITE ELEMENT MODELLING (FEM); IGNS; LASER RANGE SCANNERS; LINEAR ELASTIC MODEL; MESH; NONRIGID REGISTRATION; RIGID REGISTRATION; SURFACE FROM;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

ACCURACY; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BRAIN CORTEX; BRAIN DEFORMATION; CALCULATION; CALIBRATION; COMPUTER PROGRAM; DEVICE; DIGITAL IMAGING AND COMMUNICATIONS IN MEDICINE; ELASTICITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE GUIDE NEUROSURGERY SYSTEM; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; LASER; LASER RANGE SCANNER; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; NEUROSURGERY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SIMULATION; SWINE;

EID: 45949111615     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.186     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Du GH, Zhou LF, Mao Y, et al. The research about brain deformation in IGNS. Chinese J Minim Invas Neurosurg 2002; 17(2): 65-68.
2. Black PM, Moriarty T, Alexander E, et al. Development and implementation of intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging and its neurosurgical applications. Neurosurgery 1999; 41(4): 831-842.
3. Nimsky C, Ganslandt O, Kober H, et al. Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging combined with neuronavigation: a new concept. Neurosurgery 2001; 48(5): 1082-1091.
4. Davatzikos C, Shen D, Mohamed A, et al. A framework for predictive modelling of anatomical deformations. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2001; 20: 836-843.
5. Skrinjar O, Spencer S, Duncan JS. Brain deformation modelling for use in neurosurgery. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1998; 1496: 641-664.
6. Miga MI, Paulsen KD, Lemery JM, et al. Model-updated image guidance: initial clinical experiences with gravity-induced brain deformation. IEEE Trans Med Imag 1999; 18: 866-874.
7. Biot M. General theory of three-dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 1941; 12: 155-164.
8. Vigneron LM, Robe PA, Warfield SK, et al. XFEM-based modelling of successive resections for preoperative image updating. Proc SPIE 2006; 6141: 61411C.1-61411C.9.
9. Ji SB, Liu FH, Roberts D. Boundary conditions in a computational deformation model. Proc SPIE 2007; 6509: 65092.1-65092.11.
10. Hu JW, Jin X, Lee JB. Intraoperative brain shift prediction using a 3D inhomogeneous patient-specific finite element model. J Neurosurg 2007; 106(1): 164-169.
11. http://acts.nersc.gov/petsc/.
12. Zienkewickz OC, Taylor RL. The Finite Element Method, 4th edn. McGraw-Hill: New York, 1987.
13. Miga MI, Paulsen KD, Hoopes PJ, et al. In vivo quantification of a homogeneous brain deformation model for updating preoperative images during surgery. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2000; 47(2): 266-273.
14. Malladi R, Sethian JA, Vemuri BC. Shape modelling with front propagation: a level set approach. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1995; 17(2): 158-174.
15. Ferrant M, Nabavi A, Macq B, et al. Registration of 3D intraoperative MR images of the brain using a finite element biomechanical model. IEEE Trans Med Imag 2001; 20: 1384-1397.
16. http://www.3ddigitalcorp.com/products.htm.
17. Bookstein FL. Principal warps: thin-plate splines and the decomposition of deformations. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Machine Intell 1989; 11(6): 567-585.