Development and validation of evaluation indicators for a consortium of institutional repositories: A case study of dCollection

Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology

Volumn 59, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 1282-1294

  Kim, Yong Ho ^a   Kim, Hyun Hee ^b  

^a Pukyong National University   (South Korea)

^b Myong Ji University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; FOOD PROCESSING; MANAGEMENT; PLANNING; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RESOURCE ALLOCATION; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

(R ,S ,S) POLICY; CASE STUDIES; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORKS; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DATA AVAILABILITY; DELPHI METHODS; DIFFERENTIABILITY; EVALUATION DATA; FACTOR ANALYSIS (FA); FACTOR SCORES; INSTITUTIONAL REPOSITORIES; KEY FACTORS; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MULTI-FUNCTIONALITY; REGRESSION (R2); STRUCTURAL PATTERNS; SYSTEM PERFORMANCES;

IRIDIUM;

EID: 45949110721     PISSN: 15322882     EISSN: 15322890     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/asi.20818     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Crow, R. (2002). SPARC institutional repository checklist & resource guide. Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://www.arl.org/sparc/bm~doc/ IR_Guide_&_checklist_v1.pdf
2. Fuhr, N., Hansen, P., Mabe, M., Micsik, A., & Søvberg, I. (2001). Digital libraries: A generic classification and evaluation scheme. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2163, 187-199.
3. Gamoh, H. (2004). "A report on evaluation indicators for the university library (Version 0)" and case studies of their effectiveness focusing on electronic library service. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(4), 183-189.
4. Hair, J., Anderson, R., & Tatham, R. (1987). Multivariate data analysis (2nd ed.). New York: Macmillian.
5. Imafouo, A. (2006). A scalability survey in IR and DL. TCDL Bulletin, 2(2). Retrieved December 20, 2005, from http://www.ieee-tcdl.org/Bulletin/v2n2/ imafouo/imafouo.html
6. Itsumura, H. (2000). Evaluation of digital resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(5), 266-272.
7. Kanto, N. (2005). A project report (NII-IRP) on testing repository software platforms. Retrieved December 29, 2005, from http://www.nii.ac.jp/ metadata/irp/NII-IRPreport.pdf
8. Kim, J., & Mueller, C. (1978). Introduction to factor analysis: What is it and how to do it? Sage University Paper Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Series No. 07-013. London: Sage.
9. Kyrillidou, M. (2002). From input and output measures to quality and outcome measures, or, from the user in the life of the library to the library in the life of the user. Journal of Academic Librarianship, 28(1), 42-46.
10. Larsen, R.L. (2002). The DLib Test Suite and Metrics Working Group: Harvesting the experience from the digital library initiative. Retrieved January 3, 2006, from http://www.dlib.org/metrics/public/papers/ The_Dlib_Test_Suite_and_Metrics.pdf
11. Moffett, S., McAdam, R., & Parkinson, S. (2002). Developing a model for technology and cultural factors in knowledge management: A factor analysis. Knowledge and Process Management, 9(4), 237-255.
12. Rose, D., & Sullivan, O. (1993). Introducing data analysis for social scientists. Buckingham, England: Open University Press.
13. Saracevic, T. (2000). Digital library evaluation: Toward an evolution of concepts. Library Trends, 49(2), 350-369.
14. Saracevic, T. (2005). How were digital libraries evaluated? Paper presented at Libraries in the Digital Age (LIDA 2005) 30 May - 3 June, Dubrovnik, Croatia. Retrieved December 28, 2005, from http://www.scils.rutgers. edu/~tefko/DL_evaluation_LIDA.pdf
15. Saracevic, T., & Covi, L. (2000). Challenges for digital library evaluation. In D.H. Kraft (Ed.), Proceedings of the 63rd annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science, 37, 341-350.
16. Snead, J.T., Bertot, J.C., Jaeger, P.T., & McClure, C.R. (2005). Developing multi-method, iterative, and user-centered evaluation strategies for digital libraries: Functionality, usability, and accessibility. In A. Grove (Ed.), Proceedings of the 68th annual meeting of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 42, Charlotte, US, 1-18.
17. Ziglio, E. (1996). The Delphi method and its contribution to decision-making. In M. Adler & E. Ziglio (Eds.), Gazing into the oracle: The Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. London: Kingsley, 3-33.