Emergency cerclage versus bed rest for amniotic sac prolapse before 27 gestational weeks. A retrospective, comparative study of 161 women

European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Volumn 139, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 32-37

  Stupin, Jens H ^a   David, Matthias ^a   Siedentopf, Jan Peter ^a   Dudenhausen, Joachim W ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Amniotic sac prolapse; Cerclage; Closure of the cervix; Premature birth; Tocolysis

Indexed keywords

ANTIBIOTIC AGENT; UTERUS SPASMOLYTIC AGENT;

AMNION; AMNIOTIC SAC PROLAPSE; ARTICLE; BED REST; BIRTH WEIGHT; CERCLAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERUS SURGERY;

EID: 45949097248     PISSN: 03012115     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2007.11.009     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aarts J.M., Brons J.T., and Bruinse H.W. Emergency cerclage: a review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 50 (1995) 459-469
2. Althuisius S.M., Dekker G.A., Hummel P., Bekedam D.J., and van Geijn H.P. Final results of the cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial (CIPRACT): Therapeutic cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185 (2001) 1106-1112
3. Althuisius S.M., Dekker G.A., Hummel P., and van Geijn H.P. Cervical incompetence prevention randomized cerclage trial: Emergency cerclage with bed rest versus bed rest alone. Am J Obstet Gynecol 189 (2003) 907-910
4. Benifla J.L., Goffinet F., Darai E., Proust A., DeCrepy A., and Madelenat P. Emergency cervical cerclage after 20 weeks' gestation: A retrospective study of 6 years' practice in 34 cases. Fetal Diagn Ther 12 (1997) 274-278
5. Caruso A., Trivellini C., DeCarolis S., Paradisi G., Mancuso S., and Ferrazzani S. Emergency cerclage in the presence of protruding membranes: is pregnancy outcome predictable?. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 79 (2000) 265-268
6. Kilavuz O., Pliefke J., Beurkhardt T., and Vetter K. Ausgang der Schwangerschaft nach operativem Zervixverschluss Eine retrospektive Untersuchung von 1991-1999. Z Geburtsh Neonatol 203 Suppl. II (1999) 30
7. Novy M.J., Gupta A., Wothe D.D., Gupta S., Kennedy K.A., and Gravett M.G. Cervical cerclage in the second trimester of pregnancy: A historical cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 184 (2001) 1447-1456
8. Kurup M., and Goldkrand J.W. Cervical incompetence: Elective, emergent, or urgent cerclage. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 181 (1999) 240-246
9. Rowlands S., Trudinger B., and Visva-Lingam S. Treatment of preterm cervical dilation with glyceryl trinitrate, a nitric oxide donor. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol 4 (1996) 377-381
10. David M., and Farkic M. Modifizierter vollständiger Muttermundverschluss beim Fruchtblasenprolaps. Gynaekol Praxis 3 (1995) 425-435
11. David M., and Jorde A. Konisation und Schwangerschaft - eine Analyse verschiedener Therapiemassnahmen zur Verhinderung der Frühgeburt. Zentralbl Gynaekol 113 (1991) 1304-1312
12. Hochuli E., and Vogt H.P. Die "Doppelcerclage". Geburtsh Frauenheilk 47 (1987) 537-538
13. Saling E. Der frühe totale Muttermundverschluss zur Vermeidung habitueller Aborte und Frühgeburten. Z Geburtsh Perinat 185 (1981) 259
14. McDonald I.A. Suture of the cervix for inevitable miscarriage. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp 64 (1957) 346-350
15. Saling E. Einführung zum Thema Früh- und Spätaborte unter Berücksichtigung der kontrovers diskutierten Therapie-Ansätze. Arch Gynecol Obstet 254 (1993) 1256-1260
16. Rust O.A., Atlas R.O., Reed J., van Gaalen J., and Balducci J. Revisiting the short cervix detected by transvaginal ultrasound in the second trimester: Why cerclage therapy may not help. Am J Obstet Gynecol 185 (2001) 1098-1105
17. Belej-Rak T., Okun N., Windrim R., Ross S., and Hannah M.E. Effectiveness of cervical cerclage for a sonographically shortened cervix: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 198 (2003) 1679-1687
18. Harger J.H. Cerclage and cervical insufficiency: An evidence-based analysis. Obstet Gynecol 100 (2002) 1313-1327
19. Harger J.H. and the ACOG Committee on Practice Bulletins Cervical insufficiency. ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 48. Obstet Gynecol 102 (2003) 1091-1099
20. Romero R., Espinoza J., Erez O., and Hassan S. The role of cervical cerclage in obstetric practice. Can the patient who could benefit from this procedure be identified?. Am J Obstet Gynecol 194 (2006) 1-9
21. Drakeley A.J., Roberts D., and Alfirevic Z. Cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm delivery: meta-analysis of randomized trials. Obstet Gynecol 102 (2003) 621-627
22. Odibo A.O., Elkousy M., Ural S.H., and Macones G.A. Prevention of preterm birth by cervical cerclage compared with expectant management: A systematic review. Obstet Gynecol Surv 58 (2003) 130-136
23. Schorr S.J., and Morales W.J. Obstetric management of incompetent cervix and bulging fetal membranes. J Reprod Med 41 (1996) 235-238
24. Althuisius S.M., and van Geijn H.P. Strategies for prevention-cervical cerclage. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 112 Suppl. 1 (2005) 51-56
25. Ochi M., Ishikawa K., Itoh H., et al. Aggressive management of prolapsed fetal membranes earlier than 26 weeks' gestation by emergent McDonald cerclage combined with amniocentesis and bladder overfilling. Nippon Sanka Fujinka Gakkai Zasshi 46 (1994) 301-307
26. Olatunbosun O.A., Al-Nuaim L., and Turnell R.W. Emergency cerclage compared with bed rest for advanced cervical dilation in pregnancy. Int Surg 80 (1995) 170-174
27. Daskalakis G., Papantoniou N., Mesogitis S., and Antsaklis A. Management of cervical insufficiency and bulging fetal membranes. Obstet Gynecol 107 (2006) 221-226