On 'false, collusive objectification': Becoming attuned to self-censorship, performance and interviewer biases in qualitative interviewing

International Journal of Social Research Methodology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 229-237

  Yanos, Philip T ^a,c   Hopper, Kim ^a,b  

^a NATHAN S KLINE INSTITUTE FOR PSYCHIATRIC RESEARCH   (United States)

^b Department of Medicine   (United States)

^c JOHN JAY COLLEGE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45949091981     PISSN: 13645579     EISSN: 14645300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645570701605756     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Atkinson, P., & Coffey, A. (2002). Revisiting the relationship between participant observation and interviewing. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 801-814). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Atkinson, P., & Silverman, D. (1997). Kundera's Immortality: The interview society and the invention of the self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3, 304-325.
3. Birch, M., & Miller, T. (2000). Inviting intimacy: The interview as therapeutic opportunity. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 3, 189-202.
4. Bourdieu, P. (1999). Understanding. In P. Bourdieu (Ed.), The weight of the world: Social suffering in contemporary society (pp. 607-626). Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Charmaz, K. (1995). Between positivism and postmodernism: Implication for methods. Studies in Symbolic Interaction, 17, 43-72.
6. Davidson, L. (2003). Living outside mental illness: Qualitative studies of recovery in schizophrenia. New York, NY: New York University Press.
7. Dean, J., & Whyte, W. F. (1958). How do you know the informant is telling the truth? Human Organization, 17, 34-38.
8. Denzin, N. K. (2002). The cinematic society and the reflexive interview. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 833-847). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Geertz, C. (1990). Works and lives: The anthropologist as author. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
10. McCleod, J. (2003). Why we interview now-reflexivity and perspective in a longitudinal study. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 6, 201-211.
11. Nunkoosing, K. (2005). The problems with interviews. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 698-706.
12. Ortner, S. B. (2003). New Jersey dreaming: Capital, culture and the class of '58. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
13. Power, E. M. (2004). Toward understanding in postmodern interview analysis: Interpreting the contradictory remarks of a research participant. Qualitative Health Research, 14, 858-865.
14. Rosenblatt, P. C. (2002). Interviewing at the border of fact and fiction. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 893-909). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Snow, D. A., & Anderson, L. (1987). Identity work among the homeless: The verbal construction and avowal of personal identities. American Journal of Sociology, 92, 1336-1371.
16. Swidler, A. (2000). Talk of love: How culture matters. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
17. Wiersma, J. (1988). The press release: Symbolic communication in life history interviewing. Journal of Personality, 56, 205-238.