Is individual environmental consciousness one of the determinants in transport mode choice?

Applied Economics

Volumn 40, Issue 10, 2008, Pages 1229-1239

  Shen, Junyi ^a   Sakata, Yusuke ^b   Hashimoto, Yoshizo ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b KINKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMMUTING; DECISION ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ESTIMATION METHOD; MODELING; TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS; TRANSPORTATION MODE; TRAVEL BEHAVIOR;

ASIA; EURASIA; FAR EAST; HONSHU; JAPAN; KINKI; OSAKA [KINKI];

EID: 45949089156     PISSN: 00036846     EISSN: 14664283     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00036840600771296     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Allenby, G. and Ginter, J. (1995) The effects of in-store displays and feature advertising on consideration sets. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 12, pp. 67-80.
2. Ben-Akiva, ME and Lerman, S. (1985) Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
3. Ben-Akiva, ME, Bolduc, D. and Bradley, M. (1993) Estimation of travel choice models with randomly distributed values of time. Transportation Research Record, 1413, pp. 88-97.
4. Bhat, CR (1995) A heteroscedastic extreme value model of intercity travel mode choice. Transportation Research, 29, pp. 471-483.
5. Bradley, MA and Gunn, H. (1990) Stated preference analysis of values of travel time in the Netherlands. Transportation Research Record, 1285, pp. 78-89.
6. Gerard, K., Shanahan, M. and Louviere, J. (2003) Using stated preference discrete choice modeling to inform health care decision-making: A pilot study of breath screening participation. Applied Economics, 35, pp. 1073-1085.
7. Graham, DJ and Glaister, S. (2005) Decomposing the determinants of road traffic demand. Applied Economics, 37, pp. 19-28.
8. Greene, WH (2003) Econometric Analysis, Pearson Education International, New York University, New York
9. Greene, WH and Hensher, DA (2003) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrasts with mixed logit. Transportation Research Part B, 37, pp. 681-698.
10. Hausman, JA and McFadden, D. (1984) Specification tests for the multinomial logit model. Econometrica, 52, pp. 1219-1240.
11. Hensher, DA (1994) Stated preference analysis of travel choices: The state of the practice. Transportation, 21, pp. 107-133.
12. Hensher, DA (2001) The sensitivity of the valuation of travel time saving to the specification of unobserved effects. Transportation Research Part E, 37, pp. 129-142.
13. Kores, EP and Sheldon, RJ (1988) Stated preference methods: An introduction. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, pp. 11-25.
14. Louviere, JJ, Hensher, DA and Swait, JD (2000) Stated Choice Methods: Analysis and Applications, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
15. McFadden, D. (1974) Conditional logit analysis of quanlitative choice behavior. Frontiers in Econometrics, pp. 105-142. Academic Press, New York
16. Menendez, LG, Zarzoso, IM and Miguel, DP (2004) Determinants of mode choice between road and shipping for freight transport. Journal of Transport Economics and Policy, 38, pp. 447-466.
17. Selvanathan, S. and Selvanathan, EA (2005) Is utility additive? Further evidence. Applied Economics, 37, pp. 83-86.
18. Swait, JD and Louviere, JJ (1993) The role of the scale parameter in the estimation and comparison of multinomial logit models. Journal of Marketing Research, 30, pp. 305-314.