Measuring the reputation and productivity of communication programs

Communication Education

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 297-311

  Stephen, Timothy D ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

ComVista; FSPI; NCA; NRC; Publication Productivity; Reputational Studies

Indexed keywords

EID: 45949086999     PISSN: 03634523     EISSN: 14795795     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03634520801905600     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Academic Analytics. (n.d.). Methodology of FSP index 2005. Retrieved August 9, 2007, from http://www.academicanalytics.com/methodology2005. html
2. Chronicle of Higher Education. (n.d.). Top research universities in the 2005 Faculty Scholarly Productivity Index. Retrieved August 9, 2007, from http://chronicle.com/stats/productivity/page.php?primary=10secondary= 79bycat=Go
3. Edwards, R., & Barker, L. (1977). A rating of doctoral programs in speech communication, 1976. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 20, 59-69.
4. Edwards, R., & Barker, L. (1979a). A rating of doctoral programs in speech communication, 1978: Part I. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 30, 23-34.
5. Edwards, R., & Barker, L. (1979b). Some perceptions of highly regarded doctoral programs in speech communication, 1978. Communication Education, 28, 301-305.
6. Edwards, R., & Barker, L. (1983). Evaluative perceptions of doctoral programs in communication, 1982. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, , 76, 45, 91.
7. Edwards, R., & Barker, L. (1984). Perceptions of highly regarded doctoral programs in selected areas of speech communication, 1982. Communication Education, 33, 63-68.
8. Edwards, R., & Pood, E. (1987). Objective characteristics of graduate programs in speech communication. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 60, 18-28.
9. Edwards, R., Watson, K. W., & Barker., L. L. (1988). Highly regarded doctoral programs in selected areas of communication: 1987. Communication Education, 37, 263-269.
10. Edwards, R., Watson, K. W., & Barker., L. L. (1989). A rating of doctoral programs in selected areas of speech communication: 1987-1988. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 67, 20-36.
11. Farrell, E. F., & van der Werf, M. (2007, May 25). Playing the rankings Game. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A11.
12. Fogg, P. (2007, January 12). A new standard for measuring doctoral programs. The Chronicle of Higher Education, p. A8.
13. Hickson, I I I, M., Stacks, D. W., & Amsbary, J. H. (1989). An analysis of prolific scholarship in speech communication, 1915-1985: Toward a yardstick for measuring research productivity. Communication Education, 38, 230-236.
14. Hollihan, T. (2004). NCA doctoral reputational study, 2004. Retrieved August 9, 2007, from National Communication Association, http://www.natcom.org/nca/files/ccLibraryFiles/FILENAME/000000000318/ Doc%20Study%20Report.pdf
15. National Research Council. (n.d.). Summary of clarifications and FAQs. Retrieved August 9, 2007, from http://www7.nationalacademies.org/ resdoc/FAQ.html
16. Ostriker, J. P., & Kuh, C. V., & Voytuk, J. A. (Eds.). (2003). Assessing research-doctorate programs: A methodological study. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
17. Stephen, T., & Geel, R. (2007). Normative publication productivity of communication scholars at selected career milestones. Human Communication Research, 33, 103-118.
18. Watson, K. W., Edwards, R., & Barker, L. L. (1989). A rating of doctoral programs in selected areas of mass communication: 1987-1988. Association for Communication Administration Bulletin, 67, 20-36.