Relativistic Hydrodynamic Scaling from the Dynamics of Quantum Field Theory

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 11, 2002, Pages

  Bettencourt, Luís M A ^a   Cooper, Fred ^b   Pao, Karen ^c  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

APPROXIMATION THEORY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTRONIC DENSITY OF STATES; EQUATIONS OF MOTION; EQUATIONS OF STATE; HEAVY IONS; HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS; KINETIC THEORY; MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS; RELATIVITY;

HARTREE APPROXIMATION; HEAVY ION COLLISIONS; HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS; LAGRANGIAN DENSITY; RELATIVISTIC HYDRODYNAMIC SCALING; THERMODYNAMIC SCALAR ISOSURFACES;

QUANTUM THEORY;

EID: 45849155802     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: 10797114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.112301     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. L.D. Landau, Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR, Ser. Fiz. 17, 51 (1953);
2. L.D. Landau and S.Z. Blenkij, Usp. Fiz. Nauk 56, 309 (1955)
3. [L.D. LandauNuovo Cimento Suppl. 3S10, 15 (1956)];
4. P. Carruthers, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci.ANYAA9 229, 91 (1974).
5. See PHOBOS Collaboration, B.B. Back et al, nucl-ex/0106006, for recent results at RHIC.
6. F. Cooper, G. Frye, and E. Schonberg, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.11.192 11, 192 (1975);
7. R. Hwa, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.10.2260 10, 2260 (1974).
8. J.D. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.27.140 27, 140 (1983);
9. C.B. Chiu, E.C.G. Sudarshan, and K.-H. Wang, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.12.902 12, 902 (1975).
10. F. Cooper et al, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.48.190 48, 190 (1993).
11. K.H. Ackermann et al, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.402 86, 402 (2001);
12. C. Adler et al, nucl-ex/0107003.
13. For recent studies, see D. Teaney, J. Lauret, and E. V. Shuryak, Phys. Rev. Lett.10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4783 86, 4783 (2001);
14. P. Huovinen, P.F. Kolb, U. Heinz, P.V. Ruuskanen, and S.A. Voloshin, Phys. Lett. B10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00219-2 503, 58 (2001);
15. P.F. Kolb, P. Huovinen, U. Heinz, and H. Heiselberg, Phys. Lett. B10.1016/S0370-2693(01)00079-X 500, 232 (2001);
16. D. Molnar and M. Gyulassy, nucl-th/0104073, and references therein.
17. E. Calzetta and B.L. Hu, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.35.495 35, 495 (1987);
18. F. Cooper et al, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.50.2848 50, 2848 (1994);
19. D. Boyanovsky et al, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.51.4419 51, 4419 (1995);
20. J. Berges and J. Cox, Phys. Lett. B10.1016/S0370-2693(01)01004-8 517, 369 (2001);
21. F.L. Braghin, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.64.125001 64, 125001 (2001);
22. L.M.A. Bettencourt, K. Pao, and J.G. Sanderson, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.65.025015 65, 025015 (2002).
23. F. Cooper, G.S. Guralnik, and S.H. Kasdan, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.14.1607 14, 1607 (1976);
24. R. Jackiw and A. Kerman, Phys. Lett. A 71, 158 (1979);
25. F. Cooper, S.-Y. Pi, and P. Stancioff, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.34.3831 34, 3831 (1986);
26. D. Boyanovsky, D.-S. Lee, and A. Singh, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.48.800 48, 800 (1993);
27. D. Boyanovsky, F. Cooper, H.J. de Vega, and P. Sodano, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.58.025007 58, 025007 (1998);
28. G. Aarts and J. Smit, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.61.025002 61, 025002 (2000).
29. See D.K. Campbell, J.F. Schonfeld, and C.A. Wingate, Physica (Amsterdam) 9D, 1 (1983) for details of classical kink scattering. The quantum problem is qualitatively similar, although richer.
30. F. Cooper and D.H. Sharp, Phys. Rev. D10.1103/PhysRevD.12.1123 12, 1123 (1975).
31. E. Beth and G.E. Uhlenbeck, Physica (Amsterdam) 3, 729 (1936).
32. E.V. Shuryak, Yad. Fiz.IDFZA7 16, 395 (1972).