Magnetic correlations and the anisotropic kondo effect in Ce1-xLaxAl3

Physical Review Letters

Volumn 89, Issue 14, 2002, Pages

  Goremychkin, E A ^a   Osborn, R ^b   Rainford, B D ^a   Costi, T A ^c   Murani, A P ^d   Scott, C A ^a   King, P J C ^e  

^a ARGONNE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

^d INSTITUT LAUE LANGEVIN   (France)

^e RUTHERFORD APPLETON LABORATORY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ELECTRON TRANSPORT PROPERTIES; ENERGY GAP; FERMIONS; MAGNETIC FIELD EFFECTS; MAGNETIC RELAXATION; MAGNETIC VARIABLES MEASUREMENT; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEUTRON SCATTERING; NUMERICAL METHODS;

ANISOTROPIC KONDO EFFECTS; CERIUM LANTHANUM ALUMINUM COMPOUNDS; ELECTRONIC DISSIPATION; MAGNETIC CORRELATIONS; THERMAL DISORDER;

CERIUM COMPOUNDS;

EID: 45849154998     PISSN: 00319007     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. K. Andres, J. E. Graebner, and H. R. Ott, Phys. Rev. Lett. 35, 1779 (1975).
2. C. D. Bredl, S. Horn, F. Steglich, B. Lüthi, and R. M. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1982 (1984).
3. S. Barth, H. R. Ott, F. N. Gygax, B. Hitti, E. Lippelt, A. Schenck, and C. Baines, Phys. Rev. B 39, 11695 (1989).
4. W. H. Wong and W. G. Clark, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 108, 175, (1992).
5. J. L. Gavilano, J. Hunziker, and H. R. Ott, Phys. Rev. B 52, R13016 (1995).
6. N. Shah, P. Chandra, P. Coleman, and J. A. Mydosh, Phys. Rev. B 61, 564 (2000).
7. P. Chandra, P. Coleman, J. A. Mydosh, and V. Tripathi, Nature (London) 417, 831 (2002).
8. B. Andraka, C. S. Jee, and G. R. Stewart, Phys. Rev. B 52, 9462 (1995).
9. E. A. Goremychkin, R. Osborn, B. D. Rainford, and A. P. Murani, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 2211 (2000).
10. T. A. Costi, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 1038 (1998).
11. R. Pietri, K. Ingersent, and B. Andraka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1090 (2001).
12. We believe that the discrepancies reported in Ref. [11] are due to the neglect of crystal field effects in their calculations rather than a failure of the AKM. We will address this in more detail in a future publication.
13. A. Amato, Rev. Mod. Phys. 69, 1119 (1997).
14. 3, including our own. This remains an unresolved problem.
15. G. E. Brodale, R. A. Fisher, N. E. Phillips, and J. Flouquet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56, 390 (1986).
16. R. Osborn, E. A. Goremychkin, B. D. Rainford, I. L. Sashin, and A. P. Murani, J. Appl. Phys. 87, 5131 (2000).
17. B. D. Rainford, A. J. Neville, D. T. Adroja, S. J. Dakin, and A. P. Murani, Physica (Amsterdam) 223B & 224B, 163 (1996).
18. T. A. Costi and G. Zaránd, Phys. Rev. B 59, 12 398 (1999).
19. S. Chakravarty, and J. Rudnick, Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 591 (1995).
20. A. J. Leggett, S. Chakravarty, A. T. Dorsey, M. P. A. Fisher, A. Garg, and W. Zwerger, Rev. Mod. Phys. 59, 1 (1987).
21. T. A. Costi and C. Kieffer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1683 (1996).
22. C. Broholm, H. Lin, P. T. Matthews, T. E. Mason, W. J. L. Buyers, M. F. Collins, A. A. Menovsky, J. A. Mydosh, and J. K. Kjems, Phys. Rev. B 43, 12809 (1991).
23. W. J. L. Buyers, Z. Tun, P. Petersen, T. E. Mason, J.-G. Lussier, B. D. Gaulin, and A. A. Menovsky, Physica (Amsterdam) 199B & 200B 95 (1994).
24. K. Matsuda, Y. Kohori, T. Kohara, K. Kuwahara, and H. Amitsuka, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 087203 (2001).
25. T. T. M. Palstra, A. A. Menovsky, J. van den Berg, A. J. Dirkmaat, P. H. Kes, G J. Nieuwenhuys, and J. A. Mydosh, Phys. Rev. Lett. 55, 2727 (1985).
26. U. Walter, C.-K. Loong, M. Loewenhaupt, and W. Schlabitz, Phys. Rev. B 33, 7875 (1986).