Phosphorus under pressure: Ba-IV-type structure as a candidate for P-IV

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 69, Issue 21, 2004, Pages

  Ehlers, F J H ^a   Christensen, N E ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIUM; PHOSPHORUS;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; DENSITY FUNCTIONAL THEORY; PHASE TRANSITION; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; RECEPTOR OCCUPANCY; RELIABILITY; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 45849154853     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.214112     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. A. Morita, Appl. Phys. A: Solids Surf. 39, 227 (1986).
2. J. C. Jamieson, Science 139, 129 (1963).
3. T. Kikegawa and H. Iwasaki, Acta Crystallogr., Sect. B: Struct. Sci. 39, 158 (1983).
4. M. Okajima, S. Endo, Y. Akahama, and S. Narita, Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., Part 1 23, 15 (1984).
5. Y. Akahama, M. Kobayashi, and H. Kawamura, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8520 (1999).
6. Y. Akahama, H. Kawamura, S. Carlson, T. Le Bihan, and D. Häusermann, Phys. Rev. B 61, 3139 (2000).
7. M. I. McMahon and R. J. Nelmes, Phys. Rev. B 47, 8337 (1993).
8. R. Ahuja, Phys. Status Solidi B 235, 282 (2003).
9. R. J. Nelmes, D. R. Allan, M. I. McMahon, and S. A. Belmonte, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 4081 (1999).
10. M. I. McMahon, T. Bovornratanaraks, D. R. Allan, S. A. Belmonte, and R. J. Nelmes, Phys. Rev. B 61, 3135 (2000).
11. M. I. McMahon, O. Degtyareva, and R. J. Nelmes, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 4896 (2000).
12. U. Schwarz, L. Akselrud, H. Rosner, A. Ormeci, Y. Grin, and M. Hanfland, Phys. Rev. B 67, 214101 (2003).
13. This octagon is equilateral when x=(2-√2)/4∼0.1464.
14. S. K. Reed and G. J. Ackland, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 5580 (2000).
15. P. Hohenberg and W. Kohn, Phys. Rev. 136, B864 (1964).
16. M. Levy, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 76, 6062 (1979).
17. W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev. 140, A1133 (1965).
18. J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 3865 (1996).
19. O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 12, 3060 (1975).
20. M. Methfessel, Phys. Rev. B 38, 1537 (1988).
21. M. Methfessel, C. O. Rodriguez, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B 40, 2009 (1989).
22. N. E. Christensen and M. Methfessel, Phys. Rev. B 48, 5797 (1993).
23. N. E. Christensen and D. L. Novikov, Solid State Commun. 119, 477 (2001).
24. A. Nishikawa, K. Niizeki, and K. Shindo, Phys. Status Solidi B 223, 189 (2001).
25. S. Ostanin, V. Trubitsin, J. B. Staunton, and S. Y. Savrasov, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 087002 (2003).
26. U. Häussermann, Chem.-Eur. J. 9, 1471 (2003).
27. K. Takemura, N. E. Christensen, D. L. Novikov, K. Syassen, U. Schwarz, and M. Hanfland, Phys. Rev. B 61, 14399 (2000).
28. F. Birch, Phys. Rev. 71, 809 (1947).
29. T. Sasaki, K. Shindo, K. Niizeki, and A. Morita, J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 57, 978 (1988).
30. F. D. Murnaghan, Am. J. Math. 49, 235 (1937).
31. F. D. Murnaghan, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 30, 244 (1944).
32. O. K. Andersen and O. Jepsen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 2571 (1984).
33. W. H. Zachariasen, Acta Crystallogr. 5, 660 (1952).
34. H. Iwasaki, Phys. Rev. B 55, 14645 (1997).
35. V. Heine, Nature (London) 403, 836 (2000).
36. This parameter is quite insensitive to changes in the pressure for the two P Ba-IV-type structures.
37. At each selected relative position of the substructures, the remaining positional parameters have been kept at their values in the corresponding well-ordered arrangements.
38. M/12 and symmetric for the system in question. The chosen tolerance to the convergence of the energies in these calculations has been very low, ∼1 μRy/atom, in order to make the barrier visible.
39. U. Häussermann, K. Söderberg, and R. Norrestam, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124, 15359 (2002).
40. J. P. Perdew, J. A. Chevary, S. H. Vosko, K. A. Jackson, M. R. Pederson, D. J. Singh, and C. Fiolhais, Phys. Rev. B 46, 6671 (1992).
41. j-1, j=4→6}, respectively [U. Häussermann (private communication)].
42. For Sb-II, where the guest structure is bct, no single-crystal samples have yet been obtained, and thus it remains an open question whether diffuse scattering will be observed in this case [M. I. McMahon (private communication)].
43. In fact, recent theoretical studies (Refs. 12 and 39) of the cohesion in the Ba-IV-type structures observed in group Vb elements suggest that the bonds between the atoms in these structures are markedly different from those in Ba-IV and Sr-V. In Bi-III, Sb-II, and As-III, only strictly NN atoms in host tubes make strong bonds, whereas the situation must be different in Ba-IV and Sr-V, where next NN atoms in the nonmodulated host structure are only slightly (within 2%) further apart.