The local news story: Is quality a choice?

Political Communication

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 194-215

  Belt, Todd L ^a   Just, Marion R ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII AT HILO   (United States)

^b WELLESLEY COLLEGE   (United States)

^c HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Local news; News quality; News ratings; Television news

Indexed keywords

EID: 45849149258     PISSN: 10584609     EISSN: 10917675     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10584600801985714     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Alger, D. (1998). Megamedia: How giant corporations dominate mass media, distort competition and endanger democracy. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.
2. Bagdikian, B. H. (2000). The media monopoly (6th ed.). Boston: Beacon.
3. Baum, M. A. (2002). Sex, lies and war: How soft news brings foreign policy to the inattentive public. American Political Science Review, 96, 91-109.
4. Baum, M. A. (2003). Soft news and political knowledge: Evidence of absence or absence of evidence. Political Communication, 20, 173-190.
5. Bennett W. L. (2005). News: The politics of illusion (6th ed.). New York: Longman.
6. Blumler, J. G., & Gurevitch, M. (1995). The crisis of public communication. New York: Routledge.
7. Boemer, M. L. (1987). Correlating lead-in show ratings with local television news ratings. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 31, 89-94.
8. Capella, J. N., & Jamieson, K. H. (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Crigler, A., Just, M., & Belt, T. (2006). The three faces of negative campaigning: The democratic implications of attack ads, cynical news and fear arousing messages. In D. P. Redlawsk (Ed.), Feeling politics: Affect and emotion in political information processing. New York: Palgrave/Macmillan.
10. Davis, D. M., & Walker, J. R. (1990). Countering the new media: The resurgence of share maintenance in primetime network television. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media, 34, 487-493.
11. Ehrlich, M. C. (1995). The ethical dilemma of television news sweeps. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 10, 37-47.
12. Entman, R. (1996). Reporting environmental policy debate: The real media biases. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1, 77-92.
13. Erickson, R. S., & Tedin, K. L. (2005). American public opinion: Its origins, content and impact (7th ed.). New York: Pearson Longman.
14. Gottlieb, C., & Belt, T. (2001). Where have all the viewers gone? Columbia Journalism Review, 40, 7.
15. Graber, D. A. (1980). Crime news and the public. New York: Praeger.
16. Graber, D. A. (2001). Processing politics: Learning from television in the Internet age. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Graber, D. A. (2002). Mass media and American politics (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
18. Grossman, L. K. (1997). Why local TV news is so awful. Columbia Journalism Review, 36, 21.
19. Guensburg, C. (1999, July). Taming the beast: How can local television news operations meet demands for high ratings while providing meaningful, responsible coverage? American Journalism Review, pp. 1-12.
20. Gurevitch, M., & Blumler, J. G. (2000). Political communication systems and democratic values. In D. A. Graber (Ed.), Media power in politics (4th ed., pp. 25-35). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
21. Hamilton, J. T. (1998). Channeling violence: The economic market for violent television programming. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. Hamilton, J. T. (2004). All the news that's fit to sell: How the market transforms information into news. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
23. Hart, R. P. (1999). Seducing America: How television charms the modern voter (revised ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. Hickey, N. (2004, May). Hype takes a hit: As sweeps periods do a slow fade, so will scare stories. Columbia Journalism Review, p. 6.
25. Iyengar, S. (1987). Television news and citizens' explanations of national affairs. American Political Science Review, 81, 815-832.
26. Iyengar, S. (1991). Is anyone responsible? How television frames political issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
27. Iyengar, S., Norpoth, H., & Hahn, K. S. (2004). Consumer demand for election news: The horserace sells. Journal of Politics, 66, 157-175.
28. Just, M., Levine, R., & Belt, T. (1999). The budget game: Numbers show staff, not stuff, wins viewers. Columbia Journalism Review, 38, 93-94.
29. Kaniss, P. (1991). Making local news. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
30. Kerbel, M. R. (2000). If it bleeds, it leads: An anatomy of television news. Boulder, CO: Westview.
31. Lichter, R. S., & Noyes, R. E. (1995). Good intentions make bad news. Lanham, MA: Rowman & Littlefield.
32. McChesney, R. W. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy: Communication politics in dubious times. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
33. McManus, J. H. (1994). Market driven journalism: Let the citizen beware? Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
34. Moritz, M. (1989). The ratings "sweeps" and how they make news. In G. Burns & R. J. Thompson (Eds.), Television studies: Textual analysis (pp. 121-136). New York: Praeger.
35. Neuman, W. R., Just, M. R., & Crigler, A. N. (1992). Common knowledge: News and the construction of political meaning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Nielsen Media Research. (2008). Definition of terms. Retrieved from http://www.nielsenmedia.com/ratings101.htm
37. Patterson, T. E. (1994). Out of order. New York: Vintage.
38. Patterson, T. E. (2000). Doing well and doing good: How soft news and critical journalism are shrinking the news audience and weakening democracy - and what news outlets can do about it. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University, Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics, and Public Policy.
39. Pew Research Center for People and the Press. (2002, June 9). Public's news habits little changed by September 11: Americans lack background to follow international news. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/reports/print. php3?ReportID=156
40. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2004, June 8). News audiences increasingly politicized: Online news audiences larger, more diverse. Retrieved from www.people-press.org
41. Pew Research Center for the People and the Press. (2006). News interest index. Retrieved from http://people-press.org/nii/
42. Potter, D. (2001, May). From silly to shameless: With a few exceptions, the recent TV sweeps period brought out the worst in news coverage. American Journalism Review, p. 72.
43. Powers, A. (2001). Toward monopolistic competition in U.S. local television news. Journal of Media Economics, 14, 77-86.
44. Prior, M. (2003). Any good news in soft news? The impact of soft news preference on political knowledge. Political Communication, 20, 149-171.
45. Ramstad, G. O. (1997). A model for structural analysis of the media market. Journal of Media Economics, 10, 45-50.
46. Rosensteil, T., Just, M., Belt, T., Pertilla, A., Dean, W., & Chinni, D. (2007). We interrupt this newscast: How to improve local news and win ratings, too. New York: Cambridge University Press.
47. Scattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semisovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
48. Stempel, G. H., III, Hargrove, T., & Bernt, J. P. (2000). Relation of growth of use of the Internet to changes in media use from 1995 to 1999. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 71-79.
49. Tiedge, J. T., & Ksobiech, K. J. (1986). The 'lead-in' strategy for prime-time TV: Does it increase the audience? Journal of Communication, 36, 50-63.
50. Zaller, J. R. (1999a). Market competition and news quality. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Atlanta, GA.
51. Zaller, J. R. (1999b). A theory of media politics: How the interests of politicians, journalists, and citizens shape the news. Retrieved from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/polisci/faculty/zaller/media%20politics%20book%20.pdf
52. Zaller, J. R. (2003). A new standard of news quality: Burglar alarms for the monitorial citizen. Political Communication, 20, 109-130.