The research and family liaison: Enhancing informed consent

IRB Ethics and Human Research

Volumn 30, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 1-8

  Salas, Halle Showalter ^a   Aziz, Zuraya ^a   Villareale, Nanci ^a   Diekema, Douglas S ^a,b  

^a Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FAMILY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEW; PEDIATRICS; RESEARCH; REVIEW;

FAMILY; FOCUS GROUPS; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PEDIATRICS; PROFESSIONAL-FAMILY RELATIONS; RESEARCH;

EID: 45849144669     PISSN: 01937758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (19)

1. Tait AR, Voepel-Lewis T, Malviya S, et al. Improving the readability and processability of a pediatric informed consent document: Effects on parents' understanding. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 2005;159(4):347-352;
2. Flory J and Emanuel E. Interventions to improve research participants' understanding in informed consent for research: A systematic review. JAMA 2004;292(13):1593-1601;
3. Kodish E, Eder M, Knoll RB, et al. Communication of randomization in childhood leukemia trials. JAMA 2004;291(4):470-475.
4. Wendler DS. Assent in pediatric research: Theoretical and practical considerations. Journal of Medical Ethics 2006;32(4):2.29-234;
5. Broome ME and Richards DJ. The influence of relationships on children's and adolescents' participation in research. Nursing Research 2003;52(3):191-197;
6. Denham EJ and Nelson RM. Self-determination is not an appropriate model for understanding parental permission and child assent. Anesthesia & Analgesia 2002;94(5):1049-1051.
7. Simon CM, Zyzanski S, Durand E, et al. Interpreter accuracy and informed consent among Spanish-speaking families with cancer. Journal of Health Communication 2006;11(5):509-22;
8. Kleinman A and Benson P. Culture, moral experience and medicine. The Mount Sinai Journal of Medicine 2006;73(6):834-839.
9. Levine RJ. Clinical trials and physicians as double agents. The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine 1992;65(2):65-74;
10. Sollitto S, Hoffman S, Mehlmanet M, et al. Intrinsic conflicts of interest in clinical research: A need for disclosure. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 2003;13(2):83-91;
11. Klein J and Fleischman AR. The private practicing physician-investigator: Ethical implications of clinical research in the office setting. Hastings Center Report 2002;32(4):22-26.
12. May T, Craig JM, Spellecy R. Viewpoint: IRBs, hospital ethics committees, and the need for "translational informed consent." Academic Medicine 2007;82(7):670-674.
13. Neill KM. Research subject advocate: A new protector of research participants. Accountability in Research 2003;10(3):159-174.
14. DeWolf Bosek MS. Should an ethics consultant serve as a patient advocate? JONA's Healthcare Law, Ethics, & Regulation 2003;5(4):77-81;
15. Morreim EH. Innovation in human research protection: The independent patient advocacy council. Law and Bioethics Report 2001;1:3;
16. Morreim EH. By any other name: The many iterations of "patient advocate" in clinical research. IRB: Ethics & Human Research 2004;26(6):1-8.
17. See ref. 6, Neill 2003.
18. Starks H and Brown Trinidad S. Choose your method: A comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory. Qualitative Health Research 2007;17(10):1372-1380.
19. See ref. 6, Neill 2003.