Selecting a lead hazard control strategy based on dust lead loading and housing condition: I. Methods and results

Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

Volumn 5, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 530-539

  Dixon, Sherry ^a   Wilson, Jonathan ^a   Kawecki, Carol ^a   Green, Rodney ^b   Phoenix, Janet ^b   Galke, Warren ^c   Clark, Scott ^d   Breysse, Jill ^a  

^a National Center for Healthy Housing   (United States)

^b HOWARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Housing condition; Interim control; Intervention; Lead abatement; Lead hazard control

Indexed keywords

LEAD;

ARTICLE; BUILDING; DUST; HEALTH HAZARD; HOUSING; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL ANALYSIS; WORK ENVIRONMENT;

AIR POLLUTANTS; AIR POLLUTION, INDOOR; DUST; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL REMEDIATION; HOUSING; HUMANS; LEAD; LEAD POISONING; PAINT; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY;

EID: 45849141286     PISSN: 15459624     EISSN: 15459632     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15459620802219799     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Housing and Community Development Act. Title X: Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act. Public Law 102-550. 42 USC. 4822, 1992.
2. "Lead; Requirements for Lead-Based Paint Activities in Target Housing and Child-Occupied Facilities," Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 745. 1996.
3. U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD): Guidelines for the Evaluation and Control of Lead-Based Paint Hazards in Housing (1539-LBP). Washington, D.C.: HUD, 1995.
4. Farfel, M., and J. Chisolm Jr.: Health and environmental outcomes of traditional and modified practices for abatement of residential lead-based paint. Am. J. Publ. Health 81(10):1342-1345 (1990).
5. U.S Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA): Lead-Based Paint Abatement and Repair and Maintenance Study in Baltimore: Findings Based on Two Years of Follow-Up. Report No. 747-R-97-005. Washington, D.C.: EPA, 1997.
6. Wilson, J., T. Pivetz, P. Ashley, et al.: Evaluation of HUD-funded lead hazard control treatments at six years post-intervention. Environ. Res. 102(2):237-248 (2006).
7. Dixon, S., J. Wilson, C.S. Clark, W. Galke, P. Succop, and M. Chen: Effectiveness of lead-hazard control interventions on dust lead loadings: Findings from the evaluation of the HUD lead-based paint hazard control grant program. Environ. Res. 98(3):303-314 (2005).
8. "NOFA for the Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction in Priority Housing," Federal Register 57:129 (1992). pp. 29774-29782.
9. "NOFA for the Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction in Priority Housing; Notice," Federal Register 58:106 (1993). pp. 31848-31867.
10. Galke, W., C. Clark, P. McLaine, et al.: National evaluation of the HUD Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program: Study methods. Environ. Res. 98(3):315-328 (2005).
11. "Lead; Identification of Dangerous Levels," Code of Federal Regulations Title 40, Part 745. 2001. pp. 1211.
12. "Lead-Based Paint Poisoning Prevention in Certain Residential Structures," Code of Federal Regulations Title 24, Part 35. 2005. p. 359.
13. "Evaluation of the HUD Lead-Based Paint Hazard Control Grant Program: Final Report." [Online] Available at http://www.hud.gov/offices/ lead/reports/fifthrpt.pdf. (Accessed April 11, 2007).
14. Farfel, M.R., and J.J. Chisholm: Health and environmental outcomes of traditional and modified practices of abatement of residential lead-based paint. Am. J. Publ. Health 80(10):1240-1245 (1990).
15. Farfel, M.R., J.J. Chisholm, and C.A. Rodhe: The longer term effectiveness of residential lead paint abatement. Environ. Res. 66(2):217-21 (1994).
16. U.S Environmental Protective Agency (EPA): Review of Studies Addressing Abatement Effectiveness, updated edition (EPA Report 747-B-98-001). Washington, D.C.: EPA, 1998.