From strangers to partners: Emerging forms of research ethics consultation

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 29-31

  Carter, Michele A ^a   Night, Susan S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; NOTE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; RESEARCH ETHICS; UNITED STATES;

ETHICS CONSULTATION; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; UNITED STATES;

EID: 45849140177     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160802109538     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Aulisio, M.P., Arnold, R. M., and Youngner, S. 2000. Health care ethics consultation: nature, goals, and competencies: A position paper from the society for health and human values - Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Annals of Internal Medicine 133(1): 59-69.
2. Bell, J., Whiton, J., and Connelly, S. 1998. Final report: Evaluation of NIH implementation of section 491 of the Public Health Services Act, mandating a program of protection for research subjects (prepared for the Office of Extramural Research). Arlington, VA: Bell & Assoc.
3. Cho, M. K., Tobin, S. L., Greely, H. T., McCormick, J., Boyce, A., and Magnus, D. 2008. Strangers at beachside: Research ethics consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 8(3): 4-13.
4. de Melo-Martin, I., Palmer, L. I., and Fins, J. J. 2007. Developing a research ethics consultation service to foster responsive and responsible clinical research. Academic Medicine 82(9): 900-904.
5. Emanuel, E. J., Wendler, D., and Grady, C. 2000. What makes research ethical? JAMA 283(20): 2701-2711.
6. Grob, G. 1998. Testimony before the Committee on Government Reform and Oversight Regarding Institutional Review Boards: A time for reform. (OEI-01-97-00193). Washington, DC: Office of the Inspector General.
7. Kahn, J.P., and Mastroianni, A. C. 2001. Moving from compliance to conscience: Why we can and should improve on the ethics of clinical research. Archives of International Medicine 161(7): 925-928.
8. Miller, F. G., Rosenstein, D. L., and DeRenzo, E. G. 1998. Professional integrity in clinical research, JAMA 280(16): 1449-1454.
9. National Bioethics Advisory Commission. 2001. Ethical and policy issues in research involving human participants. Bethesda, MD: Author.
10. Institute of Medicine. 2002. Integrity in scientific research. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
11. Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services. 1998. Institutional Review Boards: A Time for Reform, 1998 (OEI-01-97-00193). Washington, DC: Author.
12. Office of the Inspector General, Department of Health and Human Services. 2000. Protecting Human Research Subjects: Status of Recommendations, 2000 (OEI-01-97-00197). Washington, DC: Author.