A Bayesian perspective on a non-parsimonious parsimony model

Systematic Biology

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 406-419

  Huelsenbeck, John P ^a   Ané, Cécile ^b,c   Larget, Bret ^b,c   Ronquist, Fredrik ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c University of Wisconsin Madison   (United States)

^d SWEDISH MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Bayesian phylogenetic inference; Markov chain Monte Carlo; Maximum likelihood; Parsimony model

Indexed keywords

GLOBIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMISTRY; CLASSIFICATION; GENETICS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHYLOGENY; PROBABILITY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERTEBRATE;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; BAYES THEOREM; GLOBINS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MARKOV CHAINS; MONTE CARLO METHOD; PHYLOGENY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; VERTEBRATES;

EID: 45849120228     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150802166046     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Beatty, J., and W. L. Fink. 1979. Review of "Simplicity" by E. Sober. Syst. Zool. 28:643-651.
2. Berger, J. O., B. Liseo, and R. L. Wolpert. 1999. Integrated likelihood methods for eliminating nuisance parameters. Stat. Sci. 14:1-28.
3. Chase, M. W., D. E. Soltis, R. G. Olmstead, D. Morgan, D. H. Les, B. D. Mishler, M. R. Duvall, R. A. Price, H. G. Hills, Y. Qiu, K. A. Kron, J. H. Rettig, E. Conti, J. D. Palmer, J. R. Manhart, K. J. Sytsma, H. J. Michaels, W. J. Kress, K. G. Karol, W. D. Clark, M. Hedren, B. S. Gaut, R. K. Jansen, K. Kim, C. F. Wimpee, J. F. Smith, G. R. Furnier, S. H. Strauss, Q. Xiang, G. M. Plunkett, P. S. Soltis, S. M. Swensen, S. E. Williams, P. A. Gadek, C. J. Quinn, L. E. Eguiarte, E. Golenberg, G. H. Learn, S. W. Graham, S. C. H. Barrett, S. Dayanandan, and V. A. Albert. 1993. Phylogenetics of seed plants: An analysis of nucleotide sequences from the plastid gene rbcl. Ann. Miss. Bot. G 80:528-580.
4. Eldredge, N., and J. Cracraft. 1980. Phylogenetic patterns and the evolutionary process. Columbia University Press, New York.
5. Farris, J. S. 1973. A probability model for inferring evolutionary trees. Syst. Zool. 22:250-256.
6. Farris, J. S. 1983. The logical basis of phylogenetic analysis. Pages 7-36 in Advances in cladistics, volume 2 (N. I. Platnick and V. A. Funk, eds.). Columbia University Press, New York.
7. Farris, J. S., V. A. Albert, M. Källersjö, D. Lipscomb, and A. G. Kluge. 1996. Parsimony jackknifing outperforms neighbor-joining. Cladistics 12:99-124.
8. Felsenstein, J. 1978. Cases in which parsimony and compatibility methods will be positively misleading. Syst. Zool. 27:401-411.
9. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17:368-376.
10. Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
11. Gaffney, E. S. 1979. An introduction to the logic of phylogeny reconstruction. Pages 79-111 in Phylogenetic analysis and paleontology (J. Cracraft and N. Eldredge, eds.). Columbia University Press, New York.
12. Goldman, N. 1990. Maximum likelihood inference of phylogenetic trees with special reference to a Poisson process model of DNA substitution and to parsimony analyses. Syst. Zool. 39:345-361.
13. Goloboff, P. A. 2003. Parsimony, likelihood, and simplicity. Cladistics 19:91-103.
14. Green, P. J. 2003. Trans-dimensional Markov chain Monte Carlo. Pages 179-198 in Highly structured stochastic systems (P. J. Green, N. L. Hjort, and S. Richardson, eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
15. Hastings, W. K. 1970. Monte Carlo sampling methods using Markov chains and their applications. Biometrika 57:97-109.
16. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and D. M. Hillis. 1993. Success of phylogenetic methods in the four-taxon case. Syst. Biol. 42:247-264.
17. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and B. Rannala. 2004. Frequentist properties of bayesian posterior probabilities of phylogenetic trees under simple and complex substitution models. Syst. Biol. 53:904-913.
18. Jukes, T. H., and C. R. Cantor. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. Pages 21-123 in Mammalian protein metabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.). Academic Press, San Diego, California.
19. Kluge, A. G. 1997. Testability and the refutation and corroboration of cladistic hypotheses. Cladistics 13:81-96.
20. Kluge, A. G. 1998. Total evidence or taxonomic congruence: Cladistics or consensus classification. Cladistics 14:151-158.
21. Kluge, A. G., and A. J. Wolf. 1993. Cladistics: What's in a word? Cladistics 9:183-199.
22. Lewis, P. O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Syst. Biol. 50:913-925.
23. Metropolis, N., A. W. Rosenbluth, M. N. Rosenbluth, A. H. Teller, and E. Teller. 1953. Equation of state calculations by fast computing machines. J. Chem. Phys. 21:1087-1092.
24. Neyman, J., and E. L. Scott. 1948. Consistent estimates based on partially consistent observations. Econometrica 16:1-32.
25. Popper, K. R. 1959. The logic of scientific discovery. Basic Books, New York.
26. Sanderson, M. J., and M. F. Wojciechowski. 2000. Improved bootstrap confidence limits in large-scale phylogenies with an example from Neo-Astragalus (Leguminosae). Syst. Biol. 49:671-685.
27. Savolainen, V., M. W. Chase, S. B. Hoot, C. M. Morton, D. E. Soltis, C. Bayer, M. F. Fay, A. D. Bruijn, S. Sullivan, and Q. L. Qiu. 2000. Phylogenetics of flowering plants based upon a combined analysis of plastid atpb and rbcl gene sequences. Syst. Biol. 49:306-362.
28. Siddall, M. E., and A. G. Kluge. 1997. Probabilism and phylogenetic inference. Cladistics 13:313-336.
29. Sinsheimer, J. S., M. A. Suchard, K. S. Dorman, F. Fang, and R. E. Weiss. 2003. Are you my mother? Bayesian phylogenetic inference of recombination among putative parental strains. App. Bioinf. 2:131-144.
30. Stamatakis, A., T. Ludwig, and H. Meier. 2005. RAxML-III: A fast program for maximum likelihood based inference of large phylogenetic tress. Bioinformatics 21:456-463.
31. Suchard, M. A., R. E. Weiss, K. S. Dorman, and J. S. Sinsheimer. 2002. Oh brother, where art thou? A Bayes factor test for recombination with uncertain heritage. Syst. Biol. 51:715-728.
32. Suchard, M. A., R. E. Weiss, K. S. Dorman, and J. S. Sinsheimer. 2003. Inferring spatial phylogenetic variation along nucleotide sequences: A multiple changepoint model. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 98:427-437.
33. Swofford, D. L. 1998. PAUP*: Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
34. Tavaré, S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Lectures Math Life Sci. 17:57-86.
35. Tierney, L. 1996. Introduction to general state-space Markov chain theory. Pages 59-74 in Markov chain Monte Carlo in practice (W. R. Gilks, S. Richardson, and D. J. Spiegelhalter, eds.). Chapman and Hall, London.
36. Tuffley, C. and M. Steel. 1997. Links between maximum likelihood and maximum parsimony under a simple model of site substitution. Bull. Math. Biol. 59:581-607.
37. Whelan, S. 2007. New approaches to phylogenetic tree search and their application to large numbers of protein alignments. Syst. Biol. 56:727-740.
38. Wiley, E. O. 1975. Karl R. Popper, systematics, and classification: A reply to Walter Bock and other evolutionary taxonomists. Syst. Biol. 24:233-243.
39. Wiley, E. O. 1981. Phylogenetics: The theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
40. Yang, Z. 1993. Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol. Biol. Evol. 10:1396-1401.
41. Yang, Z., R. Nielsen, N. Goldman, and A. M. K. Pedersen. 2000. Codon-substitution models for heterogeneous selection pressure. Genetics 155:431-449.