Applying the construction-integration framework to aesthetic responses to representational artworks

Discourse Processes

Volumn 45, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 263-287

  Millis, Keith ^a   Larson, Meredith ^b  

^a NORTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45849118042     PISSN: 0163853X     EISSN: 15326950     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01638530802070015     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Arocha, J. F., & Patel, V. L. (1995). Construction-integration theory and clinical reasoning. In C. A. Weaver, III, S. Mannes, & C. Fletcher (Eds.), Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch (pp. 359-381). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Berlyne, D. E. (1971). Aesthetics and psychobiology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
3. Berlyne, D. E. (1974). Studies in the new experimental aesthetics. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
4. Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1982). Stories are to entertain: A structural-affect theory of stories. Journal of Pragmatics, 6, 473-486.
5. Cupchik, G. C. (1992). From perception to production:Amultilevel analysis of the aesthetic process. In G. Cupchik & J. Laszlo (Eds.), Emerging visions of the aesthetic process (pp. 83-99). New York: Cambridge University Press.
6. Cupchik, G. C., & Gebotys, R. J. (1988). The search for meaning in art: Interpretive styles and judgments of quality. Visual Arts Research, 14, 38-50.
7. Cupchik, G. C., & Gebotys, R. J. (1990). Interest and pleasure as dimensions of aesthetic response. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 8, 1-14.
8. Cupchik, G. C., & Laszlo, J. (1992). Emerging visions of the aesthetic process. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Doane, S. M., McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, W., Polson, P. G., & Clawson, D. M. (1992). Prompt comprehension in UNIX command production. Memory & Cognition, 20, 327-343.
10. Eliot, T. S. (1922/2002). The Waste Land and other poems. Toronto, Canada: Random House.
11. Gibbs, W. R. & Nascimento, S. B. (1996). How we talk when we talk about love: Metaphorical concepts and understanding love poetry. In R. J. Kruez & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 291-307). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
12. Graesser, A. C., Millis, K. K., & Zwaan, R. A. (1997). Discourse Comprehenion. Annual Review of Psychology, 48, 163-189.
13. Graesser, A. C., Person, N., & Johnston, S. G. (1996). Three obstacles in empirical research on aesthetic and literary comprehension. In R. J. Kruez & M. S. MacNealy (Eds.), Empirical approaches to literature and aesthetics (pp. 3-22). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
14. Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1990). Complexity and prototypicality as determinants of the appraisal of cubist paintings. British Journal of Psychology, 81, 483-495.
15. Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. W. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. American Journal of Psychology, 109, 389-407.
16. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A constructive integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163-182.
17. Kintsch. W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
18. Kintsch, W. (2000). Metaphor comprehension: A computational theory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 257-266.
19. Kintsch, W. (2001). Predication. Cognitive Science, 25, 173-202.
20. Kintsch, W., & Bowles, A. R. (2002). Metaphor comprehension: What makes a metaphor difficult to understand? Metaphor and Symbol, 17, 249-262.
21. Kreitler, H., & Kreitler, S. (1972). Psychology of the arts. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
22. Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. T. (1997). A solution to Plato's problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 4, 211-240.
23. Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489-508.
24. Leder, H., Carbon, C., & Ripsas, A. (2006). Entitling art: Influence of title information on understanding and appreciation of paintings. Acta Psychologica, 121, 176-198.
25. Locher, P. J., & Nodine, D. P. (1987). Symmetry catches the eye. In J. K. O'Regan & A. Levy-Schoen (Eds.), Eye movements: From physiology to cognition (pp. 353-361). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
26. Mannes, S., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Routine computer tasks: Planning as understanding. Cognitive Science, 15, 305-342.
27. Martindale, C. (1984). The pleasures of thought: A theory of cognitive hedonics. Journal of Mind and Behavior, 5, 49-80.
28. Martindale, C., Moore, K., & West, A. (1988). Relationship of preference judgments to typicality, novelty, and mere exposure. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 6, 79-96.
29. Millis, K. K. (2001). Making meaning brings pleasure: The influence of titles on aesthetic experiences. Emotion, 1, 320-329.
30. Nodine, C. F., Locher, P. J., & Krupinski, E. A. (1993). The role of formal art training on perception and aesthetic judgement of art compositions. Leonardo, 26, 219-227.
31. Ognjenovic, P. (1991). Processing of aesthetic information. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 9, 1-9.
32. Russell, P. A., & Milne, S. (1997). Meaningfulness and hedonic value of paintings: Effects of titles. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 15, 61-73.
33. Schmidt, J. A., McLaughlin, J. P., & Leighten, P. (1989). Novice strategies for understanding paintings. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 3, 65-72.
34. Shapiro, A. M. (1998). Promoting active learning: The role of system structure in learning from hypertext. Human-Computer Interaction, 13, 1-35.
35. Singer, M., & Halldorson, M. (1996). Constructing and validating motive bridging inferences. Cognitive Psychology, 30, 1-38.
36. Solso, R. (1994). Cognition and the visual arts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
37. Solso, R. (2003). The psychology of art and the evolution of the conscious brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
38. van Dijk, T., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic.
39. Weaver, C. A., Mannes, S., & Fletcher, C. R. (1995). Discourse comprehension: Essays in honor of Walter Kintsch. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
40. Winston, A. S., & Cupchik, G. C. (1992). The evaluation of high art and popular art by naive and experienced viewers. Visual Arts Research, 18, 1-14.
41. Zwaan, R. A., Langston, M. C., & Graesser, A. C. (1995). The construction of situation models in narrative comprehension: An event-indexing model. Psychological Science, 6, 292-297.