Backbone dynamics of the 18.5 kDa isoform of myelin basic protein reveals transient α-helices and a calmodulin-binding site

Biophysical Journal

Volumn 94, Issue 12, 2008, Pages 4847-4866

  Libich, David S ^a   Harauz, George ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CALMODULIN; ISOPROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MYELIN SHEATH; PROTEIN BINDING; ULTRASTRUCTURE;

BINDING SITES; CALMODULIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MYELIN SHEATH; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN ISOFORMS;

EID: 45849117986     PISSN: 00063495     EISSN: 15420086     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1529/biophysj.107.125823     Document Type: Article

References (129)

1. Pribyl, T. M., C. W. Campagnoni, K. Kampf, T. Kashima, V. W. Handley, J. McMahon, and A. T. Campagnoni. 1993. The human myelin basic protein gene is included within a 179-kilobase transcription unit: expression in the immune and central nervous systems. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 90:10695-10699.
2. Campagnoni, A. T., T. M. Pribyl, C. W. Campagnoni, K. Kampf, S. Amur-Umarjee, C. F. Landry, V. W. Handley, S. L. Newman, B. Garbay, and K. Kitamura. 1993. Structure and developmental regulation of Golli-mbp, a 105-kilobase gene that encompasses the myelin basic protein gene and is expressed in cells in the oligodendrocyte lineage in the brain. J. Biol. Chem. 268:4930-4938.
3. Boggs, J. M. 2006. Myelin basic protein: a multifunctional protein. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 63:1945-1961.
4. Dyer, C. A. 1997. Myelin proteins as mediators of signal transduction. In Cell Biology and Pathology of Myelin: Evolving Biological Concepts and Therapeutic Approaches. B. H. J. Juurlink, R. M. Devon, J. R. Doucette, A. J. Nazarali, D. J. Schreyer, and V. M. K. Verge, editors. Plenum Press, New York.
5. Givogri, M. I., E. R. Bongarzone, and A. T. Campagnoni. 2000. New insights on the biology of myelin basic protein gene: the neural-immune connection. J. Neurosci. Res. 59:153-159.
6. Campagnoni, A. T., and R. P. Skoff. 2001. The pathobiology of myelin mutants reveals novel biological functions of the MBP and PLP genes. Brain Pathol. 11:74-91.
7. Harauz, G., N. Ishiyama, C. M. D. Hill, I. R. Bates, D. S. Libich, and C. Farès. 2004. Myelin basic protein-diverse conformational states of an intrinsically unstructured protein and its roles in myelin assembly and multiple sclerosis. Micron. 35:503-542.
8. Kim, J. K., F. G. Mastronardi, D. D. Wood, D. M. Lubman, R. Zand, and M. A. Moscarello. 2003. Multiple sclerosis: an important role for post-translational modifications of myelin basic protein in pathogenesis. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 2:453-462.
9. 2+-calmodulin: effects of deimination assessed by Trp fluorescence spectroscopy, dynamic light scattering, and circular dichroism. Protein Sci. 12:1507-1521.
10. Polverini, E., J. M. Boggs, I. R. Bates, G. Harauz, and P. Cavatorta. 2004. Electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy and molecular modeling of the interaction of myelin basic protein (MBP) with calmodulin (CaM)-diversity and conformational adaptability of MBP CaM-targets. J. Struct. Biol. 148:353-369.
11. Kim, H., S. Jo, H. J. Song, Z. Y. Park, and C. S. Park. 2007. Myelin basic protein as a binding partner and calmodulin adaptor for the BK(Ca) channel. Proteomics. 7:2591-2602.
12. Polverini, E., G. Rangaraj, D. S. Libich, J. M. Boggs, and G. Harauz. 2008. Binding of the proline-rich segment of myelin basic protein to SH3-domains - spectroscopic, microarray, and modeling studies of ligand conformation and effects of post-translational modifications. Biochemistry. 47:267-282.
13. Hill, C. M. D., and G. Harauz. 2005. Charge effects modulate actin assembly by classic myelin basic protein isoforms. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 329:362-369.
14. Hill, C. M. D., D. S. Libich, and G. Harauz. 2005. Assembly of tubulin by classic myelin basic protein isoforms and regulation by post-translational modification. Biochemistry. 44:16672-16683.
15. Boggs, J. M., G. Rangaraj, C. M. D. Hill, I. R. Bates, Y. M. Heng, and G. Harauz. 2005. Effect of arginine loss in myelin basic protein, as occurs in its deiminated charge isoform, on mediation of actin polymerization and actin binding to a lipid membrane in vitro. Biochemistry. 44:3524-3534.
16. Boggs, J. M., G. Rangaraj, W. Gao, and Y. M. Heng. 2006. Effect of phosphorylation of myelin basic protein by MAPK on its interactions with actin and actin binding to a lipid membrane in vitro. Biochemistry. 45:391-401.
17. Galiano, M. R., A. Andrieux, J. C. Deloulme, C. Bosc, A. Schweitzer, D. Job, and M. E. Hallak. 2006. Myelin basic protein functions as a microtubule stabilizing protein in differentiated oligodendrocytes. J. Neurosci. Res. 84:534-541.
18. Mastronardi, F. G., and M. A. Moscarello. 2005. Molecules affecting myelin stability: a novel hypothesis regarding the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. J. Neurosci. Res. 80:301-308.
19. Harauz, G., and A. A. Musse. 2007. A tale of two citrullines - structural and functional aspects of myelin basic protein deimination in health and disease. Neurochem. Res. 32:137-158.
20. Musse, A. A., and G. Harauz. 2007. Molecular "negativity" may underlie multiple sclerosis: role of the myelin basic protein family in the pathogenesis of MS. Int. Rev. Neurobiol. 79:149-172.
21. Moscarello, M. A., F. G. Mastronardi, and D. D. Wood. 2007. The role of citrullinated proteins suggests a novel mechanism in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Neurochem. Res. 32:251-256.
22. Uversky, V. N., J. R. Gillespie, and A. L. Fink. 2000. Why are "natively unfolded" proteins unstructured under physiologic conditions? Proteins. 41:415-427.
23. Dunker, A. K., C. J. Brown, J. D. Lawson, L. M. Iakoucheva, and Z. Obradovic. 2002. Intrinsic disorder and protein function. Biochemistry. 41:6573-6582.
24. Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 2006. According to current textbooks, a well-defined three-dimensional structure is a prerequisite for the function of a protein. Is this correct? IUBMB Life. 58:107-109.
25. Xie, H., S. Vucetic, L. M. Iakoucheva, C. J. Oldfield, A. K. Dunker, V. N. Uversky, and Z. Obradovic. 2007. Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 1. Biological processes and functions of proteins with long disordered regions. J. Proteome Res. 6:1882-1898.
26. Vucetic, S., H. Xie, L. M. Iakoucheva, C. J. Oldfield, A. K. Dunker, Z. Obradovic, and V. N. Uversky. 2007. Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 2. Cellular components, domains, technical terms, developmental processes, and coding sequence diversities correlated with long disordered regions. J. Proteome Res. 6:1899-1916.
27. Xie, H., S. Vucetic, L. M. Iakoucheva, C. J. Oldfield, A. K. Dunker, Z. Obradovic, and V. N. Uversky. 2007. Functional anthology of intrinsic disorder. 3. Ligands, post-translational modifications, and diseases associated with intrinsically disordered proteins. J. Proteome Res. 6:1917-1932.
28. Uversky, V. N., C. J. Oldfield, and A. K. Dunker. 2005. Showing your ID: intrinsic disorder as an ID for recognition, regulation and cell signaling. J. Mol. Recognit. 18:343-384.
29. Dosztanyi, Z., J. Chen, A. K. Dunker, I. Simon, and P. Tompa. 2006. Disorder and sequence repeats in hub proteins and their implications for network evolution. J. Proteome Res. 5:2985-2995.
30. Patil, A., and H. Nakamura. 2006. Disordered domains and high surface charge confer hubs with the ability to interact with multiple proteins in interaction networks. FEBS Lett. 580:2041-2045.
31. Bhalla, J., G. B. Storchan, C. M. MacCarthy, V. N. Uversky, and O. Tcherkasskaya. 2006. Local flexibility in molecular function paradigm. Mol. Cell. Proteomics. 5:1212-1223.
32. Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 2002. Coupling of folding and binding for unstructured proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:54-60.
33. Fuxreiter, M., I. Simon, P. Friedrich, and P. Tompa. 2004. Preformed structural elements feature in partner recognition by intrinsically unstructured proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 338:1015-1026.
34. Chi, S. W., S. H. Lee, D. H. Kim, M. J. Ahn, J. S. Kim, J. Y. Woo, T. Torizawa, M. Kainosho, and K. H. Han. 2005. Structural details on mdm2-p53 interaction. J. Biol. Chem. 280:38795-38802.
35. Eliezer, D., P. Barre, M. Kobaslija, D. Chan, X. Li, and L. Heend. 2005. Residual structure in the repeat domain of tau: echoes of microtubule binding and paired helical filament formation. Biochemistry. 44:1026-1036.
36. Oldfield, C. J., Y. Cheng, M. S. Cortese, P. Romero, V. N. Uversky, and A. K. Dunker. 2005. Coupled folding and binding with α-helixforming molecular recognition elements. Biochemistry. 44:12454-12470.
37. Tompa, P., C. Szasz, and L. Buday. 2005. Structural disorder throws new light on moonlighting. Trends Biochem. Sci. 30:484-489.
38. Tompa, P. 2005. The interplay between structure and function in intrinsically unstructured proteins. FEBS Lett. 579:3346-3354.
39. Vise, P. D., B. Baral, A. J. Latos, and G. W. Daughdrill. 2005. NMR chemical shift and relaxation measurements provide evidence for the coupled folding and binding of the p53 transactivation domain. Nucleic Acids Res. 33:2061-2077.
40. Solt, I., C. Magyar, I. Simon, P. Tompa, and M. Fuxreiter. 2006. Phosphorylation-induced transient intrinsic structure in the kinase-inducible domain of CREB facilitates its recognition by the KIX domain of CBP. Proteins. 64:749-757.
41. Sugase, K., H. J. Dyson, and P. E. Wright. 2007. Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered protein. Nature. 447:1021-1025.
42. Fuxreiter, M., P. Tompa, and I. Simon. 2007. Local structural disorder imparts plasticity on linear motifs. Bioinformatics. 23:950-956.
43. Mészáros, B., P. Tompa, I. Simon, and Z. Dosztányi. 2007. Molecular principles of the interactions of disordered proteins. J. Mol. Biol. 372:549-561.
44. Baker, J. M., R. P. Hudson, V. Kanelis, W. Y. Choy, P. H. Thibodeau, P. J. Thomas, and J. D. Forman-Kay. 2007. CFTR regulatory region interacts with NBD1 predominantly via multiple transient helices. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 14:738-745.
45. Vacic, V., C. J. Oldfield, A. Mohan, P. Radivojac, M. S. Cortese, V. N. Uversky, and A. K. Dunker. 2007. Characterization of molecular recognition features, MoRFs, and their binding partners. J. Proteome Res. 6:2351-2366.
46. Mohan, A., C. J. Oldfield, P. Radivojac, V. Vacic, M. S. Cortese, A. K. Dunker, and V. N. Uversky. 2006. Analysis of molecular recognition features (MoRFs). J. Mol. Biol. 362:1043-1059.
47. Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 2001. Nuclear magnetic resonance methods for elucidation of structure and dynamics in disordered states. Methods Enzymol. 339:258-270.
48. Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 2004. Unfolded proteins and protein folding studied by NMR. Chem. Rev. 104:3607-3622.
49. Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 2005. Elucidation of the protein folding landscape by NMR. Methods Enzymol. 394:299-321.
50. Receveur-Bréchot, V., J. M. Bourhis, V. N. Uversky, B. Canard, and S. Longhi. 2006. Assessing protein disorder and induced folding. Proteins. 62:24-45.
51. Radivojac, P., L. M. Iakoucheva, C. J. Oldfield, Z. Obradovic, V. N. Uversky, and A. K. Dunker. 2007. Intrinsic disorder and functional proteomics. Biophys. J. 92:1439-1456.
52. Mittag, T., and J. D. Forman-Kay. 2007. Atomic-level characterization of disordered protein ensembles. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 17:3-14.
53. Farès, C., D. S. Libich, and G. Harauz. 2006. Solution NMR structure of an immunodominant epitope of myelin basic protein. Conformational dependence on environment of an intrinsically unstructured protein. FEBS J. 273:601-614.
54. Bates, I. R., J. B. Feix, J. M. Boggs, and G. Harauz. 2004. An immunodominant epitope of myelin basic protein is an amphipathic a-helix. J. Biol. Chem. 279:5757-5764.
55. Libich, D. S., V. J. Robertson, M. M. Monette, and G. Harauz. 2004. Backbone resonance assignments of the 18.5 kDa isoform of murine myelin basic protein (MBP). J. Biomol. NMR. 29:545-546.
56. Libich, D. S., M. M. Monette, V. J. Robertson, and G. Harauz. 2007. NMR assignment of an intrinsically disordered protein under physiological conditions: the 18.5 kDa isoform of myelin basic protein. Biomol. NMR Assign. 1:61-63.
57. Spera, S., and A. Bax. 1991. Empirical correlation between protein backbone conformation and C-α and C-β C-13 nuclear magnetic resonance chemical shifts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 113:5490-5492.
58. Wishart, D. S., and B. D. Sykes. 1994. Chemical shifts as a tool for structure determination. Methods Enzymol. 239:363-392.
59. Wishart, D. S., and A. M. Nip. 1998. Protein chemical shift analysis: a practical guide. Biochem. Cell Biol. 76:153-163.
60. Lipari, G., A. Szabo, and R. M. Levy. 1982. Protein dynamics and NMR relaxation - comparison of simulations with experiment. Nature. 300:197-198.
61. Shojania, S., and J. D. O'Neil. 2006. HIV-1 Tat is a natively unfolded protein: the solution conformation and dynamics of reduced HIV-1 Tat-(1-72) by NMR spectroscopy. J. Biol. Chem. 281:8347-8356.
62. Bates, I. R., D. S. Libich, D. D. Wood, M. A. Moscarello, and G. Harauz. 2002. An Arg/Lys → Gln mutant of recombinant murine myelin basic protein as a mimic of the deiminated form implicated in multiple sclerosis. Protein Expr. Purif. 25:330-341.
63. 13C resonance assignments of calmodulin in solution by heteronuclear multidimensional NMR spectroscopy. Biochemistry. 30:9216-9228.
64. Ahmed, M. A., V. V. Bamm, G. Harauz, and V. Ladizhansky. 2007. The BG21 isoform of Golli myelin basic protein is intrinsically disordered with a highly flexible amino-terminal domain. Biochemistry. 46:9700-9712.
65. Wang, Y., and O. Jardetzky. 2002. Probability-based protein secondary structure identification using combined NMR chemical-shift data. Protein Sci. 11:852-861.
66. Schwarzinger, S., G. J. Kroon, T. R. Foss, J. Chung, P. E. Wright, and H. J. Dyson. 2001. Sequence-dependent correction of random coil NMR chemical shifts. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 123:2970-2978.
67. Keller, R. 2007. The Computer-Aided Resonance Assignment Tutorial. Cantina-Verlag, Goldau, Switzerland.
68. Marsh, J. A., V. K. Singh, Z. Jia, and J. D. Forman-Kay. 2006. Sensitivity of secondary structure propensities to sequence differences between α- and γ-synuclein: implications for fibrillation. Protein Sci. 15:2795-2804.
69. Palmer, A. G., N. J. Skelton, W. J. Chazin, P. E. Wright, and M. Rance. 1992. Suppression of the effects of cross-correlation between dipolar and anisotropic chemical-shift relaxation mechanisms in the measurement of spin-spin relaxation rates. Mol. Phys. 75:699-711.
70. 15N inverse detected heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy: application to staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry. 28:8972-8979.
71. 15N in macromolecules. Chem. Phys. Lett. 175:477-482.
72. Meiboom, S., and D. Gill. 1958. Modified spin-echo for measuring nuclear relaxation times. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 29:688-691.
73. Abragam, A. 1961. Principles of Nuclear Magnetism. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
74. Cavanagh, J., W. J. Fairbrother, A. G. Palmer, and N. J. Skelton. 1996. Protein NMR Spectroscopy. Principles and Practice. Academic Press (Elsevier Science), San Diego, CA.
75. 15N relaxation data exclusively. J. Biomol. NMR. 6:153-162.
76. Lipari, G., and A. Szabo. 1982. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:4546-4559.
77. Lipari, G., and A. Szabo. 1982. Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 2. Analysis of experimental results. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 104:4559-4570.
78. Clore, G. M., A. Szabo, A. Bax, L. E. Kay, P. C. Driscoll, and A. M. Gronenborn. 1990. Deviations from the simple 2-parameter model-free approach to the interpretation of N-15 nuclear magnetic relaxation of proteins. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 112:4989-4991.
79. Mandel, A. M., M. Akke, and A. G. Palmer III. 1995. Backbone dynamics of Escherichia coli ribonuclease HI: correlations with structure and function in an active enzyme. J. Mol. Biol. 246:144-163.
80. Palmer, A. G. 2007. Modelfree Manual. http://cpmcnet.columbia.edu/dept/ gsas/biochem/labs/palmer/software/modelfree-manual.pdf.
81. Sattler, M., J. Schleucher, and C. Griesinger. 1999. Heteronuclear multidimensional NMR experiments for the structure determination of proteins in solution employing pulsed field gradients. Prog. Nucl. Magn. Reson. Spectrosc. 34:93-158.
82. Markley, J. L., A. Bax, Y. Arata, C. W. Hilbers, R. Kaptein, B. D. Sykes, P. E. Wright, and K. Wüthrich. 1998. Recommendations for the presentation of NMR structures of proteins and nucleic acids - IUPAC-IUBMB-IUPAB Inter-Union Task Group on the standardization of data bases of protein and nucleic acid structures determined by NMR spectroscopy. Eur. J. Biochem. 256:1-15.
83. Buck, M. 1998. Trifluoroethanol and colleagues: cosolvents come of age. Recent studies with peptides and proteins. Q. Rev. Biophys. 31:297-355.
84. Roccatano, D., G. Colombo, M. Fioroni, and A. E. Mark. 2002. Mechanism by which 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol/water mixtures stabilize secondary-structure formation in peptides: a molecular dynamics study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:12179-12184.
85. Povey, J. F., C. M. Smales, S. J. Hassard, and M. J. Howard. 2007. Comparison of the effects of 2,2,2-trifluoroethanol on peptide and protein structure and function. J. Struct. Biol. 157:329-338.
86. Musse, A. A., J. M. Boggs, and G. Harauz. 2006. Deimination of membrane-bound myelin basic protein in multiple sclerosis exposes an immunodominant epitope. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 103:4422-4427.
87. Otzen, D. E., P. Sehgal, and L. W. Nesgaard. 2007. Alternative membrane protein conformations in alcohols. Biochemistry. 46:4348-4359.
88. Ikura, M., G. M. Clore, A. M. Gronenborn, G. Zhu, C. B. Klee, and A. Bax. 1992. Solution structure of a calmodulin-target peptide complex by multidimensional NMR. Science. 256:632-638.
89. Jo, E., and J. M. Boggs. 1995. Aggregation of acidic lipid vesicles by myelin basic protein: dependence on potassium concentration. Biochemistry. 34:13705-13716.
90. Zhong, L., V. V. Bamm, M. A. Ahmed, G. Harauz, and V. Ladizhansky. 2007. Solid-state NMR spectroscopy of 18.5 kDa myelin basic protein reconstituted with lipid vesicles: spectroscopic characterization and spectral assignments of solvent-exposed protein fragments. Biochim. Biophys. Acta (Biomembr.). 1768:3193-3205.
91. Bates, I. R., J. M. Boggs, J. B. Feix, and G. Harauz. 2003. Membrane-anchoring and charge effects in the interaction of myelin basic protein (MBP) with lipid bilayers studied by spin-labeling. J. Biol. Chem. 278:29041-29047.
92. Romero, P., Z. Obradovic, X. Li, E. C. Garner, C. J. Brown, and A. K. Dunker. 2001. Sequence complexity of disordered protein. Proteins. 42:38-48.
93. Li, X., P. Romero, M. Rani, A. K. Dunker, and Z. Obradovic. 1999. Predicting protein disorder for N-, C-, and internal regions. Genome Inform. Ser. Workshop Genome Inform. 10:30-40.
94. Garnier, J., J. F. Gibrat, and B. Robson. 1996. GOR method for predicting protein secondary structure from amino acid sequence. Methods Enzymol. 266:540-553.
95. Gaboriaud, C., V. Bissery, T. Benchetrit, and J. P. Mornon. 1987. Hydrophobic cluster analysis: an efficient new way to compare and analyze amino acid sequences. FEBS Lett. 224:149-155.
96. Rule, G. S., and T. K. Hitchens. 2006. Fundamentals of Protein NMR Spectroscopy. Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.
97. Bernado, P., E. Mylonas, M. V. Petoukhov, M. Blackledge, and D. I. Svergun. 2007. Structural characterization of flexible proteins using small-angle x-ray scattering. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 129:5656-5664.
98. Dyson, H. J., and P. E. Wright. 2002. Insights into the structure and dynamics of unfolded proteins from nuclear magnetic resonance. Adv. Protein Chem. 62:311-340.
99. Rath, A., A. R. Davidson, and C. M. Deber. 2005. The structure of "unstructured" regions in peptides and proteins: role of the polyproline II helix in protein folding and recognition. Biopolymers. 80:179-185.
100. Bates, I. R., P. Matharu, N. Ishiyama, D. Rochon, D. D. Wood, E. Polverini, M. A. Moscarello, N. J. Viner, and G. Harauz. 2000. Characterization of a recombinant murine 18.5-kDa myelin basic protein. Protein Expr. Purif. 20:285-299.
101. Palmer III, A. G. 1997. Probing molecular motion by NMR. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 7:732-737.
102. Mukherjee, M., K. Dutta, M. A. White, D. Cowburn, and R. O. Fox. 2006. NMR solution structure and backbone dynamics of domain III of the E protein of tick-borne Langat flavivirus suggests a potential site for molecular recognition. Protein Sci. 15:1342-1355.
103. Marsh, J. A., C. Neale, F. E. Jack, W. Y. Choy, A. Y. Lee, K. A. Crowhurst, and J. D. Forman-Kay. 2007. Improved structural characterizations of the drkN SH3 domain unfolded state suggest a compact ensemble with native-like and non-native structure. J. Mol. Biol. 367:1494-1510.
104. Libich, D. S., C. M. D. Hill, J. D. Haines, and G. Harauz. 2003. Myelin basic protein has multiple calmodulin-binding sites. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 308:313-319.
105. 2+-calmodulin: in vitro studies using fluorescence microscopy and spectroscopy. Biochem. Cell Biol. 80:395-406.
106. 2+-calmodulin - in vitro studies using gel shift assays. Mol. Cell. Biochem. 241:45-52.
107. 2+-calmodulin affinity chromatography and tandem mass spectrometry. J. Proteome Res. 5:669-687.
108. Zhang, Z., A. K. Ottens, E. C. Golden, R. L. Hayes, and K. K. W. Wang. 2006. Using calmodulin-affinity capture to study the rat brain calmodulin proteome and its vulnerability to calpain and caspase proteolysis. Calcium Binding Proteins. 1:125-129.
109. Hill, C. M. D., J. D. Haines, C. E. Antler, I. R. Bates, D. S. Libich, and G. Harauz. 2003. Terminal deletion mutants of myelin basic protein: new insights into self-association and phospholipid interactions. Micron. 34:25-37.
110. Tugarinov, V., P. M. Hwang, and L. E. Kay. 2004. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy of high-molecular-weight proteins. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 73:107-146.
111. Hayashi, N., M. Matsubara, Y. Jinbo, K. Titani, Y. Izumi, and N. Matsushima. 2002. Nef of HIV-1 interacts directly with calcium-bound calmodulin. Protein Sci. 11:529-537.
112. Kranz, J. K., E. K. Lee, A. C. Nairn, and A. J. Wand. 2002. A direct test of the reductionist approach to structural studies of calmodulin activity: relevance of peptide models of target proteins. J. Biol. Chem. 277:16351-16354.
113. Turjanski, A. G., D. A. Estrin, R. E. Rosenstein, J. E. McCormick, S. R. Martin, A. Pastore, R. R. Biekofsky, and V. Martorana. 2004. NMR and molecular dynamics studies of the interaction of melatonin with calmodulin. Protein Sci. 13:2925-2938.
114. 15N spectra of proteins: heteronuclear triple-resonance three-dimensional NMR spectroscopy. Application to calmodulin. Biochemistry. 29:4659-4667.
115. Borg, M., T. Mittag, T. Pawson, M. Tyers, J. D. Forman-Kay, and H. S. Chan. 2007. Polyelectrostatic interactions of disordered ligands suggest a physical basis for ultrasensitivity. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 104:9650-9655.
116. Radivojac, P., S. Vucetic, T. R. O'Connor, V. N. Uversky, Z. Obradovic, and A. K. Dunker. 2006. Calmodulin signaling: analysis and prediction of a disorder-dependent molecular recognition. Proteins. 63:398-410.
117. Porumb, T., A. Crivici, P. J. Blackshear, and M. Ikura. 1997. Calcium binding and conformational properties of calmodulin complexed with peptides derived from myristoylated alanine-rich C kinase substrate (MARCKS) and MARCKS-related protein (MRP). Eur. Biophys. J. 25:239-247.
118. 2+-calmodulin-dependent kinase kinase. Nat. Struct. Biol. 6:819-824.
119. Hoeflich, K. P., and M. Ikura. 2002. Calmodulin in action: diversity in target recognition and activation mechanisms. Cell. 108:739-742.
120. Ishida, H., and H. J. Vogel. 2006. Protein-peptide interaction studies demonstrate the versatility of calmodulin target protein binding. Protein Pept. Lett. 13:455-465.
121. Shi, Z., R. W. Woody, and N. R. Kallenbach. 2002. Is polyproline II a major backbone conformation in unfolded proteins? Adv. Protein Chem. 62:163-240.
122. Lam, S. L., and V. L. Hsu. 2003. NMR identification of left-handed polyproline type II helices. Biopolymers. 69:270-281.
123. Czinki, E., and A. G. Császár. 2007. Empirical isotropic chemical shift surfaces. J. Biomol. NMR. 38:269-287.
124. Polverini, E., A. Fasano, F. Zito, P. Riccio, and P. Cavatorta. 1999. Conformation of bovine myelin basic protein purified with bound lipids. Eur. Biophys. J. 28:351-355.
125. Permyakov, S. E., I. S. Millett, S. Doniach, E. A. Permyakov, and V. N. Uversky. 2003. Natively unfolded C-terminal domain of caldesmon remains substantially unstructured after the effective binding to calmodulin. Proteins. 53:855-862.
126. Bourhis, J. M., V. Receveur-Bréchot, M. Oglesbee, X. Zhang, M. Buccellato, H. Darbon, B. Canard, S. Finet, and S. Longhi. 2005. The intrinsically disordered C-terminal domain of the measles virus nucleoprotein interacts with the C-terminal domain of the phosphoprotein via two distinct sites and remains predominantly unfolded. Protein Sci. 14:1975-1992.
127. Sigalov, A. B., A. V. Zhuravleva, and V. Y. Orekhov. 2007. Binding of intrinsically disordered proteins is not necessarily accompanied by a structural transition to a folded form. Biochimie. 89:419-421.
128. Ramwani, J. J., R. M. Epand, and M. A. Moscarello. 1989. Secondary structure of charge isomers of myelin basic protein before and after phosphorylation. Biochemistry. 28:6538-6543.
129. Grzesiek, S., S. J. Stahl, P. T. Wingfield, and A. Bax. 1996. The CD4 determinant for downregulation by HIV-1 Nef directly binds to Nef. Mapping of the Nef binding surface by NMR. Biochemistry. 35:10256-10261.