Improving shock irregularities based on the characteristics of the MHD equations

Journal of Computational Physics

Volumn 227, Issue 16, 2008, Pages 7952-7976

  Hanawa, Tomoyuki ^a   Mikami, Hayato ^a   Matsumoto, Tomoaki ^b  

^a CHIBA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b HOSEI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Carbuncle phenomenon; Magnetohydrodynamics; Numerical shock structure; Riemann solvers; Shock instability; Upwind schemes

Indexed keywords

REYNOLDS NUMBER; SHOCK WAVES; SUPERNOVAE; VISCOSITY;

CARBUNCLE PHENOMENA; MHD EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL SCHEME; NUMERICAL SHOCK STRUCTURE; NUMERICAL VISCOSITY; RIEMANN SOLVER; SHOCK FRONTS; SHOCK INSTABILITIES; SHOCK STRUCTURE; UP-WIND SCHEME;

MAGNETOHYDRODYNAMICS;

EID: 45849110272     PISSN: 00219991     EISSN: 10902716     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2008.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. K.M. Peery, S.T. Imlay, Blunt-body flow simulations, AIAA Paper 88-2904, 1988.
2. Roe P.L. Approximate Riemann solvers, parameter vectors, and difference schemes. J. Comput. Phys. 43 (1981) 357
3. Quirk J.J. A contribution to the great Riemann solver debate. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids 18 (1994) 555
4. K. Kitamura, P. Roe, F. Ismail, An evaluation of Euler fluxes for hypersonic flow computations, in: 18th AIAA Computational Fluid Dynamics Conference, 2007, AIAA 2007-4465.
5. Harten A., Lax P.D., and van Leer B. On upstream differencing and Godunov-type schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Rev. 25 (1983) 35
6. Einfeldt B. On Godunov-type methods for gas dynamics. SIAM Numer. Anal. 25 (1988) 294
7. Wada Y., and Liou M.-S. An accurate and robust flux splitting scheme for shock and contact discontinuities. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 18 (1997) 633
8. Kim S.-S., Kim C., Rho O.-H., and Hong S.K. Cures for the shock instability: development of a shock stable Roe scheme. J. Comput. Phys. 185 (2003) 342
9. Liou M.-S. Mass flux scheme to connection to shock instability. J. Comput. Phys. 160 (2000) 623
10. Brio M., and Wu C.C. An upwind differencing scheme for the equations of ideal magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 75 (1988) 400
11. Cargo P., and Gallice G. Roe matrices for ideal MHD and systematic construction of Roe matrices for systems of conservation laws. J. Comput. Phys. 136 (1997) 446
12. T. Hanawa, H. Mikami, Y. Sato, T. Matsumoto, An approximate Riemann solver for the MHD equations and its application to type II supernova, in: Numerical Modeling of Space Plasma Flows ASTRONUM-2006, N.V. Pogorelov, G.P. Zank, (Eds.), ASP Conference Series, vol. 359, 2006, p. 158.
13. Hirsch C. Numerical Computation of Internal and External Flows vol. 2 (1992), Wiley, Chichester Chapter 21
14. Balsara D. Divergence-free adaptive mesh refinement for magnetohydrodynamics. J. Comput. Phys. 174 (2001) 614
15. Balsara D., and Spicer D. A staggered mesh algorithm using high order Godunov fluxes to ensure solenoidal magnetic fields in magnetohydrodynamic simulation. J. Comput. Phys. 149 (1999) 270
16. Takahara M., and Sato K. Effects of neutrino trapping on supernova explosions. Prog. Theor. Phys. 68 (1982) 795
17. Woosley S.E., Heger A., and Weaver T.A. The evolution and explosion of massive stars. 1015 Rev. Mod. Phys. 74 (2002) 1015
18. Matsumoto T., and Hanawa T. A fast algorithm for solving the Poisson equation on a nested grid. Astrophys. J. 583 (2003) 296