Physical evidence in drug intelligence, Part 2: Discrimination of packaging tapes by colour

Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences

Volumn 40, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 73-83

  Huttunen, Juuso ^b   Doble, Philip ^a   Dawson, Michael ^a   Roux, Claude ^a   Robertson, James ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b Forensic and Technical   (Australia)

Author keywords

Colour; Drug intelligence; Packaging tapes

Indexed keywords

ILLICIT DRUG;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; COLOR DISCRIMINATION; COLORIMETRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DATA ANALYSIS; FORENSIC SCIENCE; LEGAL EVIDENCE; PACKAGING MATERIAL;

EID: 45849109577     PISSN: 00450618     EISSN: 1834562X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00450610802047598     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Maynard P, Gates K, Roux C, Lennard C. Adhesive tape analysis: establishing the evidential value of specific techniques. J Forens Sci 2001;46:280-287.
2. Huttunen J. Doctoral Thesis: Physical Evidence in Drug Intelligence, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, 2003.
3. Gonnet JF. Colour effects of co-pigmentation of anthocyanin revisited - 3. A further description using CIELab differences and assessment of matched colours using the CMC model. Food Chem 2001;75:473-485.
4. Melgosa M, Pérez MM, Hita E. Chromaticity-discrimination thresholds with aperture and object colors: experimental results and predictions of some recent color-difference formulas. Appl Optics 1996;35:176-187.