|
|
|
Volumn 28, Issue 2, 2008, Pages
|
|
Evaluation of three penile prosthesis pump designs in a blinded survey of practitioners.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION;
EVALUATION;
HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
NURSE;
NURSE PRACTITIONER;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
NURSING STAFF;
PATIENT EDUCATION;
PENIS PROSTHESIS;
PHYSICIAN;
PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT;
PROSTHESIS;
PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT;
QUESTIONNAIRE;
SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
STANDARD;
TEACHING;
UNITED STATES;
UROLOGY;
ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL;
ERECTILE DYSFUNCTION;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES;
MODELS, ANATOMIC;
NURSE CLINICIANS;
NURSE PRACTITIONERS;
NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH;
NURSING STAFF;
PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC;
PENILE PROSTHESIS;
PHYSICIAN ASSISTANTS;
PHYSICIANS;
PROSTHESIS DESIGN;
QUESTIONNAIRES;
SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;
TEACHING MATERIALS;
UROLOGY;
|
|
EID: 45849095733
PISSN: 1053816X
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (4)
|
|
References (0)
|
