Sharing data and experience: Using the Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) "moral community" to improve research ethics consultation

American Journal of Bioethics

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2008, Pages 37-39

  Kelley, Maureen ^a,b   Fryer Edwards, Kelly ^a   Fullerton, Stephanie M ^a   Gallagher, Thomas H ^a   Wilfond, Benjamin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b Treuman Katz Center for Pediatric Bioethics   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARDS AND PRIZES; COOPERATION; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; MORALITY; NOTE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PROFESSIONAL STANDARD; RESEARCH ETHICS; STANDARD; UNITED STATES;

AWARDS AND PRIZES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; ETHICS COMMITTEES, RESEARCH; ETHICS CONSULTATION; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MORALS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 45849086957     PISSN: 15265161     EISSN: 15360075     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15265160802109397     Document Type: Note

References (10)

1. Baylis, F., and Robert, J. S. 2006. Human embryonic stem cell research: An argument for national research review. Accountability in Research 13: 207-224.
2. Caplan, A. 1986. Moral community and the responsibility of scientists. Acta Physiologica Scandinavia 128 (Suppl. 554): 78-90.
3. Cho, M. K., and Billings, P. 1997. Conflict of interest and institutional review boards. Journal of Investigative Medicine 45: 154-159.
4. Cho, M. K., Tobin, S. L., Greely, H. T., McCormick, J., Boyce, A., and Magnus, D. 2008. Strangers at the benchside: Research ethics consultation. American Journal of Bioethics 8(3): 4-13.
5. Emanuel, E.J.,Wood, A., Fleischman, A., et al. 2004. Oversight of human participants research: Identifying problems to evaluate reform proposals. Annals of Internal Medicine141(282): 282-291.
6. Ferguson, T. B., Peterson, E. D., Coombs, L. P., et al. 2003. Society of Thoracic Surgeons and the National Cardiac Database. Use of continuous quality improvement to increase use of process measures in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290(1): 49-56.
7. Joffe, S. 2003. Public dialogue and the boundaries of moral community. Journal of Clinical Ethics 14(1-2): 101-108.
8. Rubin, S., and Zoloth-Dorfman, L. 1994. First-person plural: Community and method in ethics consultation. Journal of Clinical Ethics 5: 49-54.
9. Schneiderman, L.J., Gilmer, T., Teetzel, H.D., et al. 2003. Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 290(9): 1166-1172.
10. Swetz, K.M., Crowley, M.E., Hook, C., and Mueller, P.S. 2007. Report of 255 clinical ethics consultations and review of the literature. Mayo Clinical Proceedings 82(6): 686-691.