Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging of cervical lymph nodes in patients with oral cancer: Utility of the small region of interest method in evaluating the architecture of cervical lymph nodes

Oral Radiology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 25-33

  Oomori, Miwako ^a   Fukunari, Fumilo ^a   Kagawa, Toyohiro ^a   Okamura, Kazuhiko ^a   Yuasa, Kenji ^a  

^a FUKUOKA DENTAL COLLEGE   (Japan)

Author keywords

Dynamic magnetic resonance imaging; Small region of interest method; Time intensity curve

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER STAGING; CERVICAL LYMPH NODE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; EVALUATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; KERATINIZATION; LYMPH NODE DISSECTION; LYMPHOID TISSUE; MOUTH CANCER; NECK DISSECTION; NECROSIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA; TUMOR CELL;

EID: 45749158088     PISSN: 09116028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11282-008-0071-9     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Tsuchiya J, Nagata T, Kawagoe H, Tachibana S, Kajima T, Hoshino M. Preoperative diagnosis of breast diseases by dynamic MR mammography: cut off point establishment for signal intensity ratio (in Japanese). J Jpn Pract Surg Soc 1997;58:2765-2773.
2. Nishimura H. Soft tissue tumor (in Japanese). Clin Imagiology 2001;17:121-129.
3. Stack JP, Redmond OM, Codd MB, Dervan PA, Ennis JT. Breast disease: tissue characterization with Gd-DTPA enhancement profile. Radiology 1990;174:491-494.
4. Matsumoto H, Ueno H. Orbital lymphoid tumors: comparison of features of dynamic MRI with pathological findings (in Japanese). Nippon Ganka Kiyou 1994;45:282-291.
5. Van Rijswijk CSP, Geirnaerdt MJA, Hogendoorn PCW, Taminiau AHM, Van Coevorden F, Zwinderman AH, et al. Soft-tissue tumors: value of static and dynamic gadopentetate dimeglumine-enhanced MR imaging in prediction of malignancy. Radiology 2004;233:493-502.
6. Asaumi J, Yanagi Y, Konouchi H, Hisatomi M, Matsuzaki H, Kishi K. Application of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI to differentiate malignant lymphoma from squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck. Oral Oncol 2004;40:579-584.
7. Hisatomi M, Asaumi J, Konouchi H, Yanagi Y, Matsuzaki H, Kishi K. Assessment of dynamic MRI of Warthin's tumors arising as multiple lesions in the parotid glands. Oral Oncol 2002;38:369-372.
8. Verstraete KL, Deene YD, Roels H, Dierick A, Uyttendaele D, Kunnen M. Benign and malignant musculoskeletal lesions: dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging-parametric "first-pass" images depict tissue vascularization and perfusion. Radiology 1994;192:835-843.
9. Heywang SH, Wolf A, Pruss E, Hilbertz T, Eiermann W, Permanetter W. MR imaging of the breast with Gd-DTPA: use and limitations. Radiology 1989;171:95-103.
10. Revel D, Brasch RC, Paajanen H, Rosenau W, Grodd W, Engelstad B, et al. Gd-DTPA contrast enhancement and tissue differentiation in MR imaging of experimental breast carcinoma. Radiology 1986;158:319-323.
11. Takashima S, Noguchi Y, Okumura T, Aruga H, Kobayashi T. Dynamic MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 1993;189:813-821.
12. Korogi Y, Takahashi M, Sakamoto Y, Shinzato J. Cavernous sinus: correlation between anatomic and dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging findings. Radiology 1991;180:235-237.
13. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, Leutner C, Wardelmann E, Gieseke J, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions? Radiology 1999;211:101-110.
14. Asaumi J, Matsuzaki H, Hisatomi M, Konouchi H, Shigehara H, Kishi K. Application of dynamic MRI to differentiating odontogenic myxomas from ameloblastomas. Eur J Radiol 2002;43:37-41.
15. Hulka CA, Smith BL, Sgroi DC, Tan L, Edmister WB, Semple JP, et al. Benign and malignant breast lesions: differentiation with echo-planar MR imaging. Radiology 1995;197:33-38.
16. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology 1989;170:681-686.
17. Verstraete KL, Van der Woude HJ. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. In: De Schepper AM, editor. Imaging of soft tissue tumors. Berlin: Springer; 1997. p. 89-110.
18. Moulton JS, Blebea JS, Dunco DM, Braley SE, Bisset GS, Emery KH. MR imaging of soft-tissue masses: diagnostic efficacy and value of distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;164:1191-1199.
19. Kajihara Y, Munemori O, Soma T, Imai S, Nishishita S, Hata T. Experimental studies on vascularity of metastatic lymph nodes (part 1) (in Japanese). Jpn J Lymphol 1987;10:47-50.