Mirror visual feedback alleviates deafferentation pain, depending on qualitative aspects of the pain: A preliminary report

Rheumatology

Volumn 47, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 1038-1043

  Sumitani, M ^a,e   Miyauchi, S ^b   Mccabe, C S ^c   Shibata, M ^a   Maeda, L ^a   Saitoh, Y ^a   Tashiro, T ^d   Mashimo, T ^a  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^c University of Bath   (United Kingdom)

^d KYOTO WOMEN'S UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e Graduate School of Arts and Education ^*  (Japan)

Author keywords

Deafferentation pain; Deep tissue mediated pain; Mirror visual feedback; Neurorehabilitation; Origin of pathologic pain; Pain category; Pain description; Phantom limb pain; Superficial mediated pain; Visuomotor imagery

Indexed keywords

AMITRIPTYLINE; BACLOFEN; CARBAMAZEPINE; CLOMIPRAMINE; CLONAZEPAM; FENTANYL; GABAPENTIN; IMIPRAMINE; MEXILETINE; MORPHINE; NEUROTROPIN; NORTRIPTYLINE; OXYCODONE;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; AWARENESS; BRACHIAL PLEXUS INJURY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEAFFERENTATION PAIN; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGERY; LEG AMPUTATION; LIMB MOVEMENT; MALE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NERVE INJURY; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PERIPHERAL NERVE INJURY; PHANTOM PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RATING SCALE; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; BIOFEEDBACK (PSYCHOLOGY); CAUSALGIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGERY (PSYCHOTHERAPY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PHANTOM LIMB; PILOT PROJECTS; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 45749154196     PISSN: 14620324     EISSN: 14620332     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ken170     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Tasker RR. Deafferentation syndromes: Introduction. In: Nashold BS Jr, Ovelmen-Levitt J, eds. Deafferentation pain syndromes: Pathophysiology and treatment. New York: Raven Press, 1991:241-57.
2. Friedman AH. Treatment of deafferentation pains following peripheral nerve injury. In: Nashold BS Jr, Ovelmen-Levitt J, eds. Deafferentation pain syndromes: Pathophysiology and treatment. New York: Raven Press, 1991:321-30.
3. Tourian A. Deafferentation syndrome: Medical treatment. In: Nashold BS Jr, Ovelmen-Levitt J, eds. Deafferentation pain syndromes: pathophysiology and treatment. New York: Raven Press, 1991:331-9.
4. Ramachandran VS, Rogers-Ramachandran D, Cobb S. Touching the phantom limb. Nature 1995;377:489-90.
5. McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Ring EFJ, Halligan PW, Wall PD, Blake DR. A controlled pilot study of the utility of mirror visual feedback in the treatment of complex regional pain syndrome (type 1). Rheumatology 2003;42:97-101.
6. Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery is effective for long-standing complex regional pain syndrome: A randomized controlled study. Pain 2004;108:192-8.
7. Moseley GL. Graded motor imagery for pathologic pain: A randomized controlled trial. Neurology 2006;67:2129-34.
8. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Halligan PW et al. The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain 1999;122:497-512.
9. Harris AJ. Cortical origins of pathological pain. Lancet 1999;354:1464-6.
10. McCabe CS, Haigh RC, Halligan PW, Blake DR. Simulating sensory-motor incongruence in healthy volunteers: Implications for a cortical model of pain. Rheumatology 2005;44:509-16.
11. Brodie EE, Whyte A, Niven CA. Analgesia through the looking-glass? A randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of viewing a 'virtual' limb upon phantom limb pain, sensation and movement. Eur J Pain 2007;11:428-436.
12. Casey KL. Forebrain mechanisms of nociception and pain: Analysis through imaging. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999;96:7668-74.
13. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci 2000;3:S1212-7.
14. Burke D, Gandevia SC, Macefield G. Responses to passive movement of receptors in joint, skin and muscle of the human hand. J Physiol 1988;402:347-61.
15. Macefield G, Gandevia SC, Burke D. Perceptual responses to microstimulation of single afferents innervating joints, muscles and skin of the human hand. J Physiol 1990;429:113-29.
16. Jeannerod M. The mechanisms of self-recognition in humans. Behav Brain Res 2003;142:1-15.
17. Bos E, Jeannerod M. Sense of body and sense of action both contribute to self recognition. Cognition 2002;85:177-87.
18. Blakemore SJ, Wolpert DM, Frith CD. Abnormalities in the awareness of action. Trends Cogn Sci 2002;6:237-42.
19. Morgenstern FS. The effects of sensory input and concentration on phantom limb pain. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1964;27:58-65.
20. Melzack R. The McGill Pain Questionnaire: Major properties and scoring methods. Pain 1975;1:277-99.
21. Albe-Fessard D, Ramin O. Neurophysiological studies in rats deafferented by dorsal root sections. In: Nashold BS Jr. Ovelmen-Levitt J, eds. Deafferentation pain syndromes: Pathophysiology and treatment. New York: Raven Press, 1991:121-39.
22. Sumitani M, Rossetti Y, Shibata M et al. Prism adaptation to optical deviation alleviates pathologic pain. Neurology 2007;68:128-33.