Randomized controlled clinical trial on two perineal trauma suture techniques in normal delivery;Ensayo aleatorio clínico controlado para dos técnicas de sutura perineal en parto normal

Revista Latino-Americana de Enfermagem

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 272-279

  De Almeida, Sandra Ferreira Silva ^a   Riesco, Maria Luiza Gonzalez ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Clinical trials; Delivery; Obstetrical nursing; Pain; Perineum; Suture techniques

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DELIVERY; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INJURY; PERINEUM; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SUTURING METHOD;

ADULT; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; EPISIOTOMY; FEMALE; HUMANS; PERINEUM; SUTURE TECHNIQUES;

EID: 45749148231     PISSN: 01041169     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0104-11692008000200016     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Kettle C, Hills RK, Jones P, Darby L, Gray R, Johanson R. Continuous versus interrupted repair with standard or rapidly absorbed sutures after spontaneous vaginal birth: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2002; 359:2217-23.
2. Graham ID, Carroli G, Davies C, Medves JM. Episiotomy rates around the world: an update. Birth 2005; 32(3):219-23.
3. Oliveira SMJV, Miquilini EC. Freqüência e critérios para indicar a episiotomia. Rev Esc Enferm USP 2005; 39(3):288-95.
4. Davim RMB, Enders BC, Reis MN. Estudo retrospectivo quanto à prática da episiotomia e a ocorrência de lacerações perineais em uma maternidades-escola. Nursing 2003; 62(6)38-42.
5. Schneck CA, Riesco MLG. Intervenções no parto de mulheres atendidas em um centro de parto normal intrahospitalar. Rev Min Enf 2006; 10(3):240-6.
6. Grant A. Commentary: repair of episiotomies and perineal tears. BJOG 1986; 93(5):417-9.
7. Greenberg JA, Lieberman E, Cohen AP, Ecker JL. Randomized comparison of chromic versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 for postpartum perineal repair. Obstet Gynecol 2004; 103(6):1308-13.
8. Leroux N, N, Bujold E. Impact of chromic catgut versus polyglactin 910 versus fast-absorbing polyglactin 910 sutures for perineal repair: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006; 194(6):1585-90.
9. Grant A, Gordon B, Mackrodat C, Fern E, Truesdale A, Ayres S. The Ipswich childbirth study: one year follow up of alternative methods used in perineal repair. BJOG 2001; 108(1):34-40.
10. Mahomed K, James D, Grant A, Ashurst H. The Southmead perineal suture study: a randomized comparison of suture materials and suturing techniques for repair of perineal trauma. BJOG 1989; 96(11):1272-80.
11. Fleming N. Can the suturing method make a difference in postpartum perineal pain? J Nurse Midwifery 1990; 35(1):19-25.
12. Isager-Sally L, Legarth J, Jacobsen B, Bostofte E. Episiotomy repair - immediate and long-term sequelae. A prospective randomized study of three different methods of repair. BJOG 1986; 93(5):420-5.
13. Kettle C, Johanson RB. Continuous versus interrupted sutures for perineal repair (Cochrane Review). In: The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2007. Oxford: Update Software.
14. Alexandre CW, Kimura AF, Tsunechiro MA, Oliveira SMJV. A interferência da dor nas atividades e necessidades da puérpera. Nursing 2006; 93(9):664-8.
15. a ed. São Paulo: EPU; 1988. p.1-20.
16. Myers-Helfgott MG, Helfgott A. Routine use of episiotomy in modern obstetrics. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 1999; 26(2):305-25.
17. Carvalho PSP, Okamoto T, Carvalho ACP, Rodrigues SO. Estudo comparativo em ratos da inflamação provocada por três fios de sutura absorvíveis. Rev Ciênc Bioméd 1985; 6:31-41.