Effect of the forest succession on the anurans (Amphibia: Anura) of the Reserve Catuaba and its periphery, Acre, southwestern Amazonia;Efeitos da sucessão florestal sobre a anurofauna (Amphibia: Anura) da Reserva Catuaba e seu entorno, Acre, Amazônia sul-ocidental

Revista Brasileira de Zoologia

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 49-57

  De Souza, Vanessa M ^a   De Souza, Moisés B ^b   Morato, Elder F ^b  

^a Edifício Azul ^*  (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSIDADE FEDERAL DO ACRE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Cronosequence; Diversity; Perturbation; Richness of anuran; Structure of vegetation

Indexed keywords

AMPHIBIA; ANURA;

EID: 45749109410     PISSN: 01018175     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/S0101-81752008000100008     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. ACRE. 1991. Atlas Geográfico Ambiental do Acre. Rio Branco, Secretaria do Meio Ambiente, Instituto de Meio Ambiente do Acre, 48p.
2. ACRE. 2000. Zoneamento ecológico-econômico do Acre: recursos naturais e meio ambiente. Rio Branco, Acre, SECTMA, 116p.
3. ALFORD, R.A & S.J. RICHARDS.1999. Global amphibian declines: A problem in applied ecology. Annual Review of Ecology and Sistematics 30: 133-165.
4. ALLMON, W.D. 1991. A plot study of forest floor litter frogs, Central Amazon, Brazil. Journal of Ecology 7: 503-522.
5. AUGUST, P.V. 1983. The role of habitat complexity and heterogeneity in structuring tropical mammal communities. Ecology 64 (6): 1495-1507.
6. BALMER, O. & A. ERHARDT. 2000. Consequences of succession on extensively grazed grasslands for Central European butterfly communities: rethinking conservation practices. Conservation Biology 14 (3): 746-757.
7. BERNARDE, P.S.; M.B. SOUZA & M.C.N. KOKUBUM. 1999. Predation on Hyla minuta Peters, 1872 (Anura, Hylidae) by Ancylometes spp. (Araneae, Pisauridae). Biociências 7 (1): 199-203.
8. BRANDÃO, R.A. 2002. Avaliação ecológica rápida da herpetofauna nas reserves extrativistas de pedras negras e curralinho, Costa Marques, RO. Brasil Florestal 74: 61-73.
9. BROWN, V.K. 1991. The effects of changes in habitat structure during succession in terrestrial communities, p. 141-168. In: S.S. BELL; E.D. MCCOY & H.R. MUSHINSKY (Eds). Habitat Structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. London, Chapman, 438p.
10. BROWN, V.K. & T.R.E. SOUTHWOOD. 1987. Secondary succession: patterns and strategies, p. 315-337. In: A.J. GRAY.; M.J. CRAWLEY & P.J. EDWARDS (Eds). Colonization, Succession and Stability. Oxford, Blackwell Scientific, 482p.
11. CALDWELL, J.P. 1991. A new species of toad in the genus Bufo from Pará, Brazil, with an unusual breeding site. Papéis Avulsos de Zoologia 37 (26): 389-400.
12. CARDOSO, A.J & M.B. SOUZA. 1996. Distribuição temporal e espacial de anfíbios anuros no Seringal Catuaba, Estado do Acre-Brasil, p. 271-292. In: J.E. PÉRFAUS (Ed.). Herpetological Neotropical. Venezuela, Universidade dos Andes, Actas 2° Congresso Latino Americano de Herpetologia, 451p.
13. CONNELL, J.H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302-1310.
14. CONNELL, J.H & R.O. SLATYER. 1977. Mechanisms of succession in natural communities and their role in community stability and organization. American Naturalist 111: 1119-1144.
15. CONTE, C.E & D. DE C. ROSSA- FERES. 2006. Diversidade e ocorrência temporal da anurofauna (Amphibia, Anura) em São José dos Pinhais, Paraná, Brasil. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 23 (1): 162-175.
16. DUELLMAN, W.E. 1978. The biology of an equatorial herpetofauna in Amazonian Ecuador. Miscellaneous Publication of the Museum of Natural History University of Kansas 65: 1-352.
17. ETEROVICK, P.C & I. SAZIMA. 1998. New species of Proceratophrys (Anura: Leptodactylidae) from southeastern Brasil. Copeia: 159-164.
18. FLOAATER, G.J & M.P.ZALUCKI. 2000. Habitat structure and egg distributions in the processionary caterpillar Ochrogaster lunifer: lessons for conservation and pest management. Journal of Applied Ecology 37: 87-99.
19. FONSECA, G.A.B. 1989. Small mammal species diversity in brazilian tropical primary and secondary forests of different sizes. Revista Brasileira de Zoologia 6 (3): 381-422.
20. FROST, D.R. 2007. Amphibian species of the world: an online reference. Version 5.0. Electronic Database available at: http://research.amnh.org/herpetology/amphibia/index.php [Accessed in 20/V/2007].
21. FUNTAC. 1990. Monitoramento da cobertura florestal do Estado do Acre: desmatamento e uso atual da terra. Rio Branco, Secretária de Indústria e Comércio, Fundação de tecnologia do Estado do Acre, 214p.
22. GASCON, C.; T.E. LOVEJOY; R.O. BIERREGAARD JR; J.R. MALCOLM; P.C. STOUFFER; H.L. VASCONCELOS; W.F. LAURANCE; B. ZIMMERMAN; M. TOCHER & S. BORGES. 1999. Matrix habitat and species richness in tropical forest remnants. Biological Conservation 91: 223-229.
23. GIARETTA, A.A.; K.G. FACURE; J.H. DE M. MEYER & N. CHEMIN. 1999. Diversity and abundance of litter frogs in a forest of southeastern Brazil: seasonal and altitudinal changes. Biotropica 31 (4): 669-674.
24. GRIME, J.P. 1973. Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242: 344-347.
25. GUARIGUATA, M.R & R.OSTERTAG. 2001. NeoTropical secondary forest succession: changes in structural and functional characteristics. Forest Ecology and Management 148: 184-206.
26. HEYER, W.R.; A.S. RAND; C.A.G.CRUZ & O.L.PEIXOTO. 1988. Decimations, extinctions, and colonizations of frog populations in southeast Brasil and their evolutionary implications. Biotropica 20: 230-235.
27. HEYER, W.R & L.M. HARDY. 1991. A new species of frog of the Eleutherodactylus lacrimosus assembly from Amazonia, South America (Amphibia: Anura: Leptodactylidae). Proceedings Biological Society of Washington, 104 (3): 436-447.
28. HORN, H.S. 1975. Markovian properties of forest sucession, p. 196-211. In: M.L. CODY & J.M. DIAMOND (Eds). Ecology and evolution of communities. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 545p.
29. HUSTON, M.A. 1994. Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscapes. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 681p.
30. IMBEAU, L.; P. DRAPEAU & M. MONKKONEN. 2003. Are forest birds categorized as "edge species" strictly associated with edges? Ecography 26 (4): 514-520.
31. ISHITANI, M.; D.J.KOTZE & J. NIEMELÄ. 2003. Changes in carabid beetle assemblages across an urban-rural gradient in Japan. Ecography 26: 481-489.
32. LERTZMAN, K & J. FALL. 1998. From forest stands to landscapes: spatial scales and the roles of disturbances, p. 339-367. In: D.L. PETERSON & V.T. PARKER (Eds). Ecological scale: theory and applications. New York, Columbia University Press, 615p.
33. LUDWIG, J.A & J.F.REYNOLDS. 1988. Statistical ecology: a primer on methods and computing. New York, John Wiley & Sons, 337p.
34. a ed., 951p.
35. MESQUITA, C.C. DE. 1996. O clima do estado do Acre. Rio Branco, Secretaria de Estado de Ciência, Tecnologia e Meio Ambiente (SECTMA), 53p.
36. MESQUITA, C.C. DE & R.A. PAIVA. 1995. Estudos básicos das precipitações do Acre. Rio Branco, Secretaria de Estado de Planejamento, 148p.
37. MORATO, E.F. & R.P. MARTINS. 2005. Diversidade e composição da fauna de vespas e abelhas solitárias do estado do Acre, Amazônia Sul-Ocidental, p. 11-40. In: P.M. DRUMOND (Ed.). Fauna do Acre. Rio Branco. Rio Branco, Edufac, Série Estudos e Pesquisas 2, 203p.
38. NICHOLS, O.G. & F.M. NICHOLS. 2003. Long-term trends in faunal recolonization after bauxite mining in the Jarrah Forest of Southwestern Australia. Restoration Ecology 11 (3): 261-272.
39. PHILLIPS, K. 1990. Where have all the frogs and toads gone? BioScience 40: 422-424.
40. PIANKA, E.R. 1967. On lizard species diversity: North American flatland deserts. Ecology 48 (3): 333-351.
41. PICKETT, S.T.A & P.S. WHITE. 1985. Patch dynamics: a synthesis, p. 371-384. In: S.T.A. PICKETT & P.S. WHITE (Eds). The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. San Diego, Academic Press, 472p.
42. RICHARDS, O.W. 1926. Studies on the ecology of English heaths. III. Animal successions at Oxshott Heath, Surrey. Journal of Ecology 14: 241-281.
43. ROSENZWEIG, M.L. 1995. Species diversity in space and time. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 436p.
44. SBH. 2005. Lista de espécies de anfíbios do Brasil. Sociedade Brasileira de Herpetologia (SBH). Disponível na World Wide Web em: http://www.sbherpetologia.org.br/checklist/anfibios.htm [Acessado em 14/IX/2005].
45. SCHOENER, T.W. 1970. Nonsynchronous spatial overlap of lizards in patchy habitats. Ecology 51 (3): 408-418.
46. nd ed., 399p.
47. rd ed., 887p.
48. SOUSA, W.P. 1984. The role of disturbance in natural communites. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 15: 353-391.
49. SOUZA, M.B & A.J. CARDOSO. 2002. Anfíbios registrados na Reserva Extrativista do Alto Juruá, p. 101-103. In: M. C. DA CUNHA & M. B. DE ALMEIDA (Eds). Enciclopédia da Floresta. São Paulo, Companhia das Letras, 735p.
50. SOUZA, M.B & C.F.B. HADDAD. 2003. Redescrition and reevaluation of the generic status of Leptodactylus dandasi (Amphibia, Anura, Leptodactylidae) and description of its unusual advertisement call. Journal of Herpetology 37 (3): 490-497.
51. SOUZA, M.B.; M. SILVEIRA; M.R.M. LOPES; L.J.S. VIEIRA; E.G. SILVA; A.M. CALOURO & E.F. MORATO. 2003. A Biodiversidade no Estado do Acre: conhecimento atual, conservação e Perspectivas. Tecnologia e Ciência da Amazônia 3: 45-56.
52. SOUZA, M.B & A.J. CARDOSO. 2002. Anfíbios, p. 601-614. In: M.C. CUNHA & M.B. ALMEIDA (Eds). Enciclopédia da Floresta. São Paulo, Companhia das Letras, 735p.
53. STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I & T. TSCHARNTKE. 1997. Early succession of butterfly and plant communities on set-aside fields. Oecologia 109: 294-302.
54. STEFFAN-DEWENTER, I. & T. TSCHARNTKE. 2001. Sucession of bee communities on fallows. Ecography 24: 83-93.
55. TERBORGH, J & K. PETREN. 1991. Development of hábitat structure through succession in Amazonian floodplain forest, p. 28-46. In: S.S. BELL; E.D. MCCOY & H.R. MUSHINSKY (Eds). Habitat structure: the physical arrangement of objects in space. London, Chapman, 438p.
56. THOMAS, C.D. 1995. Ecology and conservation of butterfly metapopulations in the fragmented British landscape, p. 46-63. In: A.S. PULLIN (Ed.). Ecology and conservation of butterflies. London, Chapman & Hall, 363p.
57. TOCHER, M.D. 1998. Diferenças na composição de espécies de sapos entre três tipos de floresta e campo de pastagem na Amazônia central, p. 219-233. In: C. GASCON & P. MOUTINHO (Eds). Floresta Amazônica: dinâmica, regeneração e manejo. Manaus, INPA, MCT, 373p.
58. TOCHER, M.D.; C. GASCON & B.L. ZIMMERMAN. 1997. Fragmentation effects on a central Amazonian frog community: a ten-year study, p.124-137. In: W.F. LAURENCE & R.O. BIERREGAARD JR (Eds). Tropical forest remanants: ecology, management and conservation of fragmented communities. Chicago, The University of Chicago Press, 632p.
59. TOKESHI, M. 1999. Species coexistence: ecological and evolutionary perspectives. Oxford, Blackwell Science, 454p.
60. a ed., 592p.
61. USHER, M.B & R.G. JEFFERSON. 1991. Creating new and sucessional habitats for arthropods, p. 263-291. In: N.M. COLLINS & J.A. THOMAS (Eds). The conservation of insects and their habitats. London, Academic Press, 450p.
62. VIDAL, M.D & R. CINTRA. 2006. Effects of Forest structure components on the occurence, group size and density of groups of bare-face tamarin (Saguinus bicolor - Primates: Callitrichinae) in Central Amazonia. Acta Amazonica 36 (2): 237-248.
63. VITT, L.J.; J.P. CALDWELL; H.M. WILBUR & D.C. SMITH. 1990. Amphibians as harbingers of decaly. BioScience 40: 4-18.
64. WADDINGTON, K.D.; L.H. HERBST & D.W. ROUBIK. 1986. Relationship between recruitment systems of stingless bees and withinnest worker size variation. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society 59 (1): 95-102.
65. WHITE, P.S & S.T.A. PICKETT. 1985. Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction, p. 3-33. In: S.T.A. PICKETT & P.S. WHITE (Eds). The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. San Diego, Academic Press, 472p.