-
2
-
-
4243059985
-
-
C.H. Bennett, G. Brassard, C. Crépeau, R. Jozsa, A. Peres, W.K. Wootters, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 1895 (1993)
-
(1993)
Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.70
, pp. 1895
-
-
Bennett, C.H.1
Brassard, G.2
Crépeau, C.3
Jozsa, R.4
Peres, A.5
Wootters, W.K.6
-
3
-
-
2642621560
-
-
D. Boschi, S. Branca, F. De Martini, L. Hardy, S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998)
-
D. Bouwmeester, J.-W. Pan, K. Mattle, M. Eibl, H. Weinfurter, A. Zeilinger, Nature (London) 390, 575 (1997); D. Boschi, S. Branca, F. De Martini, L. Hardy, S. Popescu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1121 (1998)
-
(1997)
Nature (London)
, vol.390
, pp. 575
-
-
Bouwmeester, D.1
Pan, J.-W.2
Mattle, K.3
Eibl, M.4
Weinfurter, H.5
Zeilinger, A.6
-
5
-
-
33749338679
-
-
Q. Zhang, A. Goebel, C. Wagenknecht, Y.-A. Chen, B. Zhao, T. Yang, A. Mair, J. Schmiedmayer, Nat. Phys. 2, 678 (2006)
-
(2006)
Nat. Phys.
, vol.2
, pp. 678
-
-
Zhang, Q.1
Goebel, A.2
Wagenknecht, C.3
Chen, Y.-A.4
Zhao, B.5
Yang, T.6
Mair, A.7
Schmiedmayer, J.8
-
6
-
-
33749512818
-
-
J.F. Sherson, H. Krauter, R.K. Olsson, B. Julsgaard, K. Hammerer, I. Cirac, E.S. Polzik, Nature (London) 443, 557 (2006)
-
(2006)
Nature (London)
, vol.443
, pp. 557
-
-
Sherson, J.F.1
Krauter, H.2
Olsson, R.K.3
Julsgaard, B.4
Hammerer, K.5
Cirac, I.6
Polzik, E.S.7
-
8
-
-
0000589631
-
-
J.I. Cirac, A.S. Parkins, Phys. Rev. A 50, R4441 (1994); S.B. Zheng, G.C. Guo, Phys. Lett. A 232, 171 (1997); S.B. Zheng, Opt. Commun. 167, 111 (1999); S. Bose, P.L. Knight, M.B. Plenio, V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5158 (1999); S. Bandyopadhyay, Phys. Rev. A 62, 012308 (2000)
-
L. Davidovich, N. Zagury, M. Brune, J.M. Raimond, S. Haroche, Phys. Rev. A 50, R895 (1994); J.I. Cirac, A.S. Parkins, Phys. Rev. A 50, R4441 (1994); S.B. Zheng, G.C. Guo, Phys. Lett. A 232, 171 (1997); S.B. Zheng, Opt. Commun. 167, 111 (1999); S. Bose, P.L. Knight, M.B. Plenio, V. Vedral, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5158 (1999); S. Bandyopadhyay, Phys. Rev. A 62, 012308 (2000)
-
(1994)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.50
-
-
Davidovich, L.1
Zagury, N.2
Brune, M.3
Raimond, J.M.4
Haroche, S.5
-
12
-
-
37649030825
-
-
R.W. Chhajlany, A. Wójcik, Phys. Rev. A 73, 016302 (2006); L. Ye, G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 73, 016303 (2004)
-
L. Ye, G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 70, 054303 (2004); R.W. Chhajlany, A. Wójcik, Phys. Rev. A 73, 016302 (2006); L. Ye, G.-C. Guo, Phys. Rev. A 73, 016303 (2004)
-
(2004)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.70
, pp. 054303
-
-
Ye, L.1
Guo, G.-C.2
-
13
-
-
28844480503
-
-
W.B. Cardoso, A.T. Avelar, B. Baseia, N.G. de Almeida, Phys. Rev. A 72, 045802 (2005)
-
(2005)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.72
, pp. 045802
-
-
Cardoso, W.B.1
Avelar, A.T.2
Baseia, B.3
de Almeida, N.G.4
-
15
-
-
0001648082
-
-
I. Cusumano, A. Vaglica, G. Vetri, Phys. Rev. A 66, 043408 (2002)
-
A. Vaglica, Phys. Rev. A 58, 3856 (1998); I. Cusumano, A. Vaglica, G. Vetri, Phys. Rev. A 66, 043408 (2002)
-
(1998)
Phys. Rev. A
, vol.58
, pp. 3856
-
-
Vaglica, A.1
-
17
-
-
0000336857
-
-
C. Tanguy, S. Reynaud, C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Phys. B 17, 4623 (1984); M. Freyberger, A.M. Herkommer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1952 (1994); A. Vaglica, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3195 (1996)
-
T. Sleator, T. Pfau, V. Balykin, O. Carnal, J. Mlynek, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1996 (1992); C. Tanguy, S. Reynaud, C. Cohen-Tannoudji, J. Phys. B 17, 4623 (1984); M. Freyberger, A.M. Herkommer, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 1952 (1994); A. Vaglica, Phys. Rev. A 54, 3195 (1996)
-
(1992)
J. Phys. Rev. Lett.
, vol.68
, pp. 1996
-
-
Sleator, T.1
Pfau, T.2
Balykin, V.3
Carnal, O.4
Mlynek5
-
20
-
-
45749129616
-
-
note
-
For the benefit of the reader, in this paper we restrict to the nodal approximation of the Hamiltonian since the mathematics in the antinodal case is a bit more involved TC, epjd. Nonetheless, we point out that both the teleportation scheme TC and the efficiency analysis presented in this work hold in the antinodal case as well
-
-
-
-
24
-
-
45749111222
-
-
note
-
Similarly to the seminal proposal by Bennett et al. bennett, in such cases teleportation is completed after that a 180 degree rotation around the z-axis in the internal Hilbert space of atom 1 is performed
-
-
-
-
25
-
-
45749112356
-
-
note
-
x] is still significant
-
-
-
-
27
-
-
45749087525
-
-
note
-
Actually, this is an overestimated value since a look at Fig. 1 shows how even at shorter strengths of ετ, such as ετ = 5, there is not so a narrow range of position-measurement outcomes that ensure successful teleportation
-
-
-
|