Intellectual Property management in publicly funded R&D centres-A comparison of university-based and company-based research centres

Technovation

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 473-484

  Young, Beth ^a   Hewitt Dundas, Nola ^b   Roper, Stephen ^c  

^a Mergers and Acquisitions Group   (United Kingdom)

^b QUEEN'S UNIVERSITY BELFAST   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Intellectual Property; Ireland; Public R D; Spillovers

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRY; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY; INTERNET; INTERNET PROTOCOLS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; MANAGEMENT; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGY;

(R ,S ,S) POLICY; DIFFERENT TYPES; ELSEVIER (CO); EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE; INDUSTRY SCIENCE LINKS (ISL); INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE BASED ECONOMY; KNOWLEDGE SPILLOVERS; MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; OPEN INNOVATION; POLICY-MAKERS; RESEARCH CENTRES;

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH;

EID: 45649085127     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2008.02.004     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Allen K.R. Bringing New Technology to Market (2003), Prentice-Hall, New Jersey
2. Arai, H., 1999. Intellectual Property policies for the twenty-first century: the Japanese experience in wealth creation. Policy Advisory Commission of the World Intellectual Property Organization.
3. Beugelsdijck, S., Cornet, M., 2001. How far do they reach? The localisation of industrial and academic spillovers in the Netherlands. Centre Discussion Paper, No. 47.
4. Bigliardi B., Dormio A.I., Nosella A., and Petroni G. Assessing science parks' performances: directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation 26 (2006) 489-505
5. Blackburn R.A. Intellectual Property and Innovation Management in Small Firms (2003), Routledge, London and New York
6. Bozeman B. Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Research Policy 29 (2000) 627-655 Elsevier, Amsterdam
7. Chen J., Zhu Z., and Xie H.Y. Measuring intellectual capital: a new model and empirical study. Journal of Intellectual Capital 5 1 (2004) 195-212 Emerald Group Publishing Limited
8. Chesbrough H. Open Innovation (2003), Harvard Business School Press, Harvard
9. Cooke P., and Leydesdorff L. Regional development in the knowledge-based economy: the construction of advantages. Journal of Technology Transfer 31 1 (2006) 5-15
10. Coriat B., and Orsi F. Establishing a new intellectual property rights regime in the United States. Origins, content and problems. Research Policy 31 (2002) 1491-1507 Elsevier, Amsterdam
11. Debackere K., and Veugelers R. The role of academic technology transfer organizations in improving industry-science links. Research Policy 34 3 (2005) 321-342 Elsevier, Amsterdam
12. Department of Enterprise, Trade and Investment, 2003. Northern Ireland Research and Development Statistics 2002. National Statistics Publication, Northern Ireland Statistics & Research Agency, 28 November, pp. 1-30.
13. Dietz J.S., and Bozeman B. Academic careers, patents, and productivity: industry experience as scientific and technical human capital. Research Policy 34 3 (2005) 349-367 Elsevier, Amsterdam
14. European Union, 2004. Management of Intellectual Property in publicly funded research organisations: towards European guidelines. European Commission, Expert Group, European Commission, Luxembourg.
15. Feller I. S&T-based development and the University. Economic Development Quarterly 18 2 (2004) 138-150 Sage
16. Fernandez E., Junquera B., and Vazquez C. Government support for R&D: the Spanish case. Technovation 16 (1996) 59-66 Elsevier, Amsterdam
17. Gloet M., and Terziovski M. Exploring the relationship between knowledge management practices and innovation performance. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management 15 5 (2004) 402-409 Emerald Group Publishing Limited
18. Graversen E.K., Schmidt E.K., and Langberg K. Dynamic research environments: a development model. The International Journal of Human Resource Management 16 8 (2005) 1498-1511 London
19. Guellec D., and Van Pottelsberghe De La Potterie B. From R&D to productivity growth: do the institutional settings and the source of funds of R&D matter?. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 66 3 (2004) 353-378
20. Hanel P. Intellectual Property Rights business management practices: a survey of the literature. Technovation 26 8 (2006) 895-931 Elsevier, Amsterdam
21. Hewitt-Dundas H., Andréosso-O'Callaghan B., Crone M., and Roper S. Knowledge transfers from multi-national plants in Ireland-a cross-border comparison of supply chain linkages. European Urban and Regional Studies 12 1 (2005) 23-43
22. Iansiti M., and Levien R. The Keystone Advantage (2004), Harvard Business Press, Harvard
23. Invest Northern Ireland, 2003. RTD Centres of Excellence. 〈http://www.investni.com/index/develop/dv-invest-in-rdt/research_and_development/rtdcentresofexcellence.htm〉.
24. Jarzabkowski P. Strategy as Practice: An Activity-Based Approach (2005), Sage, London, UK
25. Kumar N., and Aggarwal A. Liberalization, outward orientation and in-house R&D activity of multinational and local firms: a quantitative exploration for Indian manufacturing. Research Policy 34 (2005) 441-460 Elsevier, Amsterdam
26. Lee J., and Win H.N. Technology transfer between university research centers and industry in Singapore. Technovation 24 5 (2004) 433-442 Elsevier, Amsterdam
27. Link A.N., and Scott J.T. Universities as partners in US research joint ventures. Research Policy 34 (2005) 385-393 Elsevier, Amsterdam
28. Link A.N., and Siegel D.S. Generating science-based growth: an econometric analysis of the impact of organizational incentives on university-industry technology transfer. The European Journal of Finance 11 3 (2005) 169-181 London
29. Lockett A., and Wright M. Resources, capabilities, risk capital and the creation of university spin-out companies. Research Policy 34 7 (2005) 1043-1057 Elsevier, Amsterdam
30. Marques P.P.C., Caraça J.M.G., and Diz H. How can university-industry-government interactions change the innovation scenario in Portugal? The case of the University of Coimbra. Technovation 26 (2006) 534-542
31. Mowery D., Nelson R., Sampat B., and Ziedonis A. Ivory Tower and Industrial Innovation: University-Industry Technology Transfer Before and After the Bayh-Dole Act (2004), Stanford Business Books, Stanford
32. Reddy P. New trends in globalization of corporate R&D and implications for innovation capability in host countries: a survey from India. World Development 25 11 (1997) 1821-1837 Elsevier Science Ltd., Oxford
33. Rodriguez-Pose A. Innovation prone and innovation averse societies: economic performance in Europe. Growth and Change 30 1 (1999) 75-105
34. Roper, S., 2000. Benchmarking regional innovation: a comparison of Baden-Württemberg, Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland. Working Paper No. 56. NIERC, Belfast.
35. Roper S., Hewitt-Dundas N., and Love J.H. An ex ante evaluation framework for the regional benefits of publicly supported R&D projects. Research Policy 33 3 (2004) 487-509 Elsevier, Amsterdam
36. Siegel D.S., Waldman D.A., Atwater L.E., and Link A.N. Commercial knowledge transfers from universities to firms: improving the effectiveness of university-industry collaboration. Journal of High Technology Management Research 14 (2003) 111-133 Pergamon
37. Zahra S., and George G. Absorptive capacity: a review, re-conceptualization, and extension. Academy of Management Review 27 (2002) 185-203