Expectant parents' preferences for mode of delivery and trade-offs of outcomes for breech presentation

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 305-310

  Kok, Marjolein ^a   Gravendeel, Lonneke ^a   Opmeer, Brent C ^a   van der Post, Joris A M ^a   Mol, Ben W J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b MÁXIMA MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Breech delivery; Breech presentation; Preference

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMAN; MALE; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PREGNANCY COMPLICATION; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANK SUM TEST; STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; VAGINAL DELIVERY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BREECH PRESENTATION; CESAREAN SECTION; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DELIVERY, OBSTETRIC; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, NEWBORN; MATERNAL MORTALITY; NETHERLANDS; PARENTS; PARITY; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY OUTCOME; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESIDENCE CHARACTERISTICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; VERSION, FETAL;

EID: 45649084156     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2008.04.008     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Hickok D.E., Gordon D.C., Milberg J.A., Williams M.A., and Daling J.R. The frequency of breech presentation by gestational age at birth: a large population-based study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 166 March (1992) 851-852
2. Mazor M., Hagay Z.J., Leiberman J.R., Baile Y., and Insler V. Fetal malformations associated with breech delivery. Implications for obstetric management. J Reprod Med 30 November (1985) 884-886
3. Gifford D.S., Morton S.C., Fiske M., and Kahn K. A meta-analysis of infant outcomes after breech delivery. Obstet Gynecol 85 June (1995) 1047-1054
4. Hannah M.E., Hannah W.J., Hewson S.A., Hodnett E.D., Saigal S., and Willan A.R. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: a randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet 356 October 21 (2000) 1375-1383
5. Rietberg C.C., Elferink-Stinkens P.M., and Visser G.H. The effect of the Term Breech Trial on medical intervention behaviour and neonatal outcome in The Netherlands: an analysis of 35,453 term breech infants. BJOG 112 February (2005) 205-209
6. Ananth C.V., Smulian J.C., and Vintzileos A.M. The association of placenta previa with history of cesarean delivery and abortion: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 177 November (1997) 1071-1078
7. Lydon-Rochelle M., Holt V.L., Easterling T.R., and Martin D.P. Risk of uterine rupture during labor among women with a prior cesarean delivery. New Engl J Med 345 July 5 (2001) 3-8
8. Sheiner E., Shoham-Vardi I., Hallak M., Hershkowitz R., Katz M., and Mazor M. Placenta previa: obstetric risk factors and pregnancy outcome. J Matern Fetal Med 10 December (2001) 414-419
9. Villar J., Valladares E., Wojdyla D., Zavaleta N., Carroli G., Velazco A., et al. Caesarean delivery rates and pregnancy outcomes: the 2005 WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Latin America. Lancet 367 June 3 (2006) 1819-1829
10. Whyte H., Hannah M.E., Saigal S., Hannah W.J., Hewson S., Amankwah K., et al. Outcomes of children at 2 years after planned cesarean birth versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: the International Randomized Term Breech Trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol 191 September (2004) 864-871
11. Kassirer J.P. Incorporating patients' preferences into medical decisions. New Engl J Med 330 June 30 (1994) 1895-1896
12. Gamble J.A., and Creedy D.K. Women's request for a cesarean section: a critique of the literature. Birth 27 December (2000) 256-263
13. Hodnett E.D., Hannah M.E., Hewson S., Whyte H., Amankwah K., Cheng M., et al. Mothers' views of their childbirth experiences 2 years after planned caesarean versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term, in the international randomized Term Breech Trial. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 27 March (2005) 224-231
14. Bayram N., van W.M., van der V., Bossuyt P.M., and Nieuwkerk P. Treatment preferences and trade-offs for ovulation induction in clomiphene citrate-resistant patients with polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 84 August (2005) 420-425
15. Steures P., Berkhout J.C., Hompes P.G., van der Steeg J.W., Bossuyt P.M., van d V., et al. Patients' preferences in deciding between intrauterine insemination and expectant management. Hum Reprod 20 March (2005) 752-755
16. Lyerly A.D., Mitchell L.M., Armstrong E.M., Harris L.H., Kukla R., Kuppermann M., et al. Risks, values, and decision making surrounding pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol 109 April (2007) 979-984
17. Kwee A., Bots M.L., Visser G.H., and Bruinse H.W. Uterine rupture and its complications in the Netherlands: a prospective study. Eur J Obstet Gyn R B March 9 (2006)