Supervising probationers with mental disorder: How do agencies respond to violations?

Criminal Justice and Behavior

Volumn 35, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 832-847

  Louden, Jennifer Eno ^a   Skeem, Jennifer L ^a   Camp, Jacqueline ^b   Christensen, Elizabeth ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA   (United States)

Author keywords

Mentally disordered offenders; Probationers; Probationers with mental illness; Specialized probation caseloads

Indexed keywords

EID: 45549106942     PISSN: 00938548     EISSN: 15523594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0093854808319042     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Probation and Parole Association. (2003). Resolution regarding the criminal justice system's response to individuals with mental illness. Retrieved May 27, 2007, from http://www.appa-net.org/about/res/mentalhealth.htm
2. Bercovitz, J., Bemus, B., & Hendricks, W. (1993). Probation case classification and workload measures system for Indiana. Indianapolis: Indiana Judicial Center.
3. Bonta, J., Rugge, T., Sedo, B., & Coles, R. (2004). Case management in Manitoba probation. Retrieved May 27, 2007, from http://ww2.pssp.gc.ca/ publications/corrections/200401_e.asp
4. Burke, P.B. (1997). Policy-driven responses to probation and parole violations. Silver Spring, MD: Center for Effective Public Policy.
5. Chakravarti, I.M., Laha, R.G., & Roy, J. (1967). Handbook of methods of applied statistics, Volume I. New York: John Wiley.
6. Council of State Governments. (2002). Criminal justice/mental health consensus project. Retrieved August 15, 2002, from http://www.consensusproject. org
7. Dauphinot, L. (1996). The efficacy of community correctional supervision for offenders with severe mental illness. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
8. Eno Louden, J., Camp, J., & Skeem, J. (2005, March). Supervision practices in specialty mental health probation: What happens in sessions? Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Psychology-Law Society, La Jolla, CA.
9. Glaze, L. (2003). Probation and parole in the United States, 2002. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
10. Griffin, P. (1999). Developing and administering accountability-based sanctions for juveniles (Juvenile Accountability Incentive Block Grants Program [JAIBG] Bulletin). Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice & Delinquency Prevention.
11. Harrell, A., & Roman, J. (2001). Reducing drug use and crime among offenders: The impact of graduated sanctions. Journal of Drug Issues, 31 (1). 207-232.
12. James, D.J., & Glaze, L.E. (2006). Mental health problems of prison and jail inmates. Washington, DC: Bureau of Justice Statistics.
13. Kinsella, C., & Fuller, K. (2003). Community-based supervision dilemma. State Government News (Council of State Governments). Retrieved May 27, 2007, from www.appa-net.org/resources/pubs/docs/May03SGN_Fuller.pdf
14. Lowenkamp, C., Latessa, E., & Smith, P. (2006). Does correctional program quality really matter? The impact of adhering to the principles of effective interventions. Criminology and Public Policy, 5 (3). 201-220.
15. Manchak, S., & Skeem, J. (2007, June). Care, control, and mental disorder: Comparing practices and outcomes in prototypic specialty vs. traditional probation. Poster presented at the North American Correctional and Criminal Justice Psychology Conference, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
16. McGuire, J. (2001). What works in correctional intervention? Evidence and practical considerations. In G. Bernfeld, D. Farrington, & A. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 25-43). New York: John Wiley.
17. Millard, D.A. (1982). Keeping the probation service whole: The case for discretion. British Journal of Social Work, 12, 291-301.
18. Oregon Department of Corrections. (1990). Oregon case-management system for community services: Time study and auditing system design/implementation. Salem, OR: Author.
19. Orlando-Morningstar, D., Skoler, G., & Holliday, S. (1999). Handbook for working with mentally disordered defendants and offenders. Washington, DC: Federal Judicial Center.
20. Paparozzi, M.A., & Gendreau, P. (2005). An intensive supervision program that worked: Service delivery, professional orientation, and organizational supportiveness. The Prison Journal, 85, 445-466.
21. Petersilia, J., & Turner, S. (1990). Comparing intensive and regular supervision for high-risk probationers: Early results from an experiment in California. Crime & Delinquency, 36, 87-111.
22. Skeem, J.L., Emke-Francis, P., & Eno Louden, J. (2006). Probation, mental health, and mandated treatment: A national survey. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 33, 158-184.
23. Skeem, J., Encandela, J., & Eno Louden, J. (2003). Experiences of mandated mental health treatment in traditional and specialty probation programs. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 21, 429-458.
24. Skeem, J., & Eno Louden, J. (2006). Toward evidence-based practice for probationers and parolees mandated to mental health treatment. Psychiatric Services, 57 (3). 333-342.
25. Skeem, J., Eno Louden, J., Polaschek, D., & Camp, J. (2007). Assessing relationship quality in mandated community treatment: Blending care with control. Psychological Assessment, 19, 397-410.
26. Skeem, J.L., & Manchak, S. (in press). Back to the future: From Klockars' model of effective supervision to evidence-based practice in probation. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation.
27. Taxman, F., Soule, D., & Gelb, A. (1999). Graduated sanctions: Stepping into accountable systems and offenders. The Prison Journal, 79 (2). 182-204.
28. Teplin, L. (1994). Psychiatric and substance abuse disorders among male urban jail detainees. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 290-293.
29. Teplin, L., Abram, K., & McClelland, G. (1996). Prevalence of psychiatric disorders among incarcerated women. American Journal of Public Health, 84, 290-293.