Nutrient removal process selection for planning and design of large wastewater treatment plant upgrade needs

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 57, Issue 9, 2008, Pages 1345-1348

  Urgun Demirtas, M ^a   Pagilla, K R ^a   Kunetz, T E ^b   Sobanski, J P ^b   Law, K P ^c  

^a Illinois Institute of Technology   (United States)

^b Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater Chicago   (United States)

^c CTE AECOM   (United States)

Author keywords

Design; Nutrient removal; Planning; Technology assessment

Indexed keywords

NUTRIENT REMOVAL; PLANNING AND DESIGN; TOTAL NITROGEN (TN); WASTE WATER TREATMENT (WWT) PLANTS;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; DESIGN; NUTRIENT; PLANNING METHOD; WASTEWATER; WATER TECHNOLOGY; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ENERGY CONSERVATION; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; INDUSTRY AND INDUSTRIAL PHENOMENA; INORGANIC NUTRIENT; NUTRIENT CONCENTRATION; NUTRIENT CONTENT; ORGANIC NUTRIENT; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER TREATMENT PLANT;

NITROGEN; PHOSPHORUS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER PURIFICATION;

CHICAGO; ILLINOIS; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 45549100264     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2008.223     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Pagilla, K. R., Urgun-Demirtas, M. & Ramani, R. 2006 Low effluent nutrient treatment technologies for wastewater treatment. Water Sci. Technol. 53(3), 165-172.
2. Sedlack, R. 1991 Phosphorus and Nitrogen Removal from Municipal Wastewater. Soap and Detergent Association.
3. USEPA 1978 Estimating Water Treatment Costs U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, EPA 600/2-79-162b, Cincinnati, OH.
4. USEPA 1998 Detailed Costing Document for the Centralized Waste Treatment Industry, Office of Water, EPA:821-R-98-016, Washington, DC.
5. WEF 1998 Biological and Chemical Systems for Nutrient Removal, Water Environment Federation, Alexandria, VA.