Research challenges inherent in determining improvement in university teaching

Issues in Educational Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 12-25

  Devlin, Marcia ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 45549097848     PISSN: 03137155     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Berk, R. A. (2005). Survey of 12 strategies to measure teaching effectiveness. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 17(1), 48-62.
2. Brinko, K. T. (1993). The practice of giving feedback to improve teaching. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 574-593.
3. Devlin, M. (2003). A solution-focused model for improving individual university teaching. International Journal for Academic Development, 8(1-2), 77-89.
4. Devlin, M. (2004). Communicating outcomes of students' evaluations of teaching and learning: One-size-fits-all? In C.S. Nair (Ed.), Refereed Proceedings of the 2004 Evaluation Forum: Communicating Evaluation Outcomes: Issues and Approaches. Monash University, Melbourne, 24-25 November, 2004, pp. 132-140.
5. Devlin, M. (2006). Teaching the teacher. Campus Review, 16(6), 8-9.
6. Devlin, M. (2007). An examination of a solution-focused approach to university teaching development. Unpublished PhD Thesis, Centre for the Study of Higher Education, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
7. Gay, L. R. & Airasian, P. (1992). Educational research (7th edition). Upper Saddle River: Merrill Prentice Hall.
8. Gibbs, G. & Coffey, M. (2004). The impact of training university teachers on their teaching skills, their approach to teaching and the approach to learning of their students. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(1), 87-100.
9. Goldschmid, M. L. (1978). The evaluation and improvement of teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 7, 221-245.
10. Guskey, T. R. (1986). Staff development and the process of teacher change. Educational Researcher, 15(5), 5-12.
11. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., and Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university academics. Review of Educational Research, 72(2), 177-228.
12. Kember, D. (2003). To control or not to control: the question of whether experimental designs are appropriate for evaluating teaching innovations in higher education. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 28(1), 89-101.
13. L'Hommedieu, R., Menges, R. J. & Brinko, K. T. (1990). Methodological explanations for the modest effects of feedback. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 232-241.
14. Marsh, H. W. (1994). Students' Evaluation of Educational Quality (SEEQ): A Multidimensional Rating Instrument of Students' Perceptions of Teaching Effectiveness. Self Research Centre: University of Western Sydney.
15. Marsh, H. W. & Dunkin, M. J. (1992). Students' evaluations of university teaching: A multidimensional perspective. In J. C. Smart (Ed.), Higher education: Vol 8. Handbook on theory and research (pp. 143-234). New York: Agathon.
16. Marsh, H. W. & Roche, L. (1993). The use of students' evaluations and an individually structured intervention to enhance university teaching effectiveness. American Educational Research Journal, 30(1), 217-251.
17. Martens, E. & Prosser, M. (1998). What constitutes high quality learning and how to assure it. Quality Assurance in Education, 6(1), 28-36.
18. McKeachie, W. J., Lin, Y.-G., Daugherty, M., Moffett, M. M., Neigler, C., Nork, J., et al. (1980). Using student ratings and consultation to improve instruction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 50, 168-174.
19. Oakley, A. (2003). The 'new' technology of systematic research synthesis: challenges for social science. Paper presented at the Education, New Technologies, Local and Global Challenges: Learning in new environments conference, Madison, Wisconsin, U.S.A.
20. Piccinin, S. (1999). How individual consultation affects teaching. In C. Knapper & S. Piccinin (Eds.), Using consultants to improve teaching, New Directions for Teaching and Learning (Vol. 79, pp. 71-83). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
21. Piccinin, S., Christi, C. & McCoy, M. (1999). The impact of individual consultation on student ratings of teaching. The International Journal for Academic Development, 4(2), 75-88.
22. Ramsden, P. (2003). Chapter 1: Introduction. In Learning to teach in higher education (2nd edition) (pp. 3-13). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
23. Weimer, M. & Lenze, L. F. (1997). Instructional interventions: A review of the literature on efforts to improve instruction. In R. P. Perry & J. C. Smart (Eds.), Effective Teaching in Higher Education: Research and Practice (pp. 205-240). New York: Agathon Press.