Two worlds apart: The divergence of national and local immigrant integration policies in the Netherlands

Administration and Society

Volumn 40, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 335-357

  Poppelaars, Caelesta ^a   Scholten, Peter ^b  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Decision making; Immigrant integration; Implementation; Policy controversies

Indexed keywords

EID: 45549096408     PISSN: 00953997     EISSN: 15523039     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0095399708317172     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Anderson, B. (1983). Imagined communities. Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
2. Andeweg, R.B., & Irwin, G.A. (2005). Governance and politics of the Netherlands: Comparative government and politics (2 nd ed.). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
3. Association of Dutch Municipalities. (2003). De Lokale Agenda Integratiebeleid [The agenda of local integration policy]. The Hague, the Netherlands: Author.
4. Barret, S.M. (2004). Implementation studies: Time for a revival? Personal reflections on 20 years of implementation studies. Public Administration, 82, 249-262.
5. Baumgartner, F.R., & Jones, B.D. (1993). Agendas and instability in American politics. London: University of Chicago Press.
6. Brubaker, R., Loveman, M., & Stamatov, P. (2004). Ethnicity as cognition. Theory and Society, 33, 31-64.
7. Cohen, J. (2002, November 26). "Vreemden" [" Strangers"]. Cleveringa-lecture, Leiden University.
8. De Beus, J. (1998). The cultus van vermijding [The cult of avoidance]. Utrecht, FORUM.
9. De Boer, J.W. (2001). De opkomst van de wijkaanpak als dominante strategie in sociaal beleid [The rise of the neighborhood approach as dominant strategy in social policy]. In J. W. Duyvendak & J. Veldboer (Eds.), Meeting point Nederland: Over samenlevingsopbouw, multiculturaliteit en sociale cohesie (pp. 29-50). Amsterdam: Boom.
10. Department of Home Affairs. (1983). Minorities Memorandum. The Hague, the Netherlands: Sdu Press.
11. De Zwart, F., & Poppelaars, C. (2004). Ontwijkende administratieve categorieën en etnische fragmentatie. Een internationaal perspectief [Evasive administrative categories and ethnic fragmentation. An international perspective]. Beleid & Maatschappij, 31 (1). 3-14.
12. De Zwart, F., & Poppelaars, C. (2007). Redistribution and ethnic diversity in the Netherlands: Accommodation, denial and replacement. Acta Sociologica, 50, 387-399.
13. Dunn, W.N. (1994). Public policy analysis: An introduction. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
14. Durant, R.F., & Legge, J.S. (2006). "Wicked problems," public policy, and administrative theory. Administration & Society, 38, 309-334.
15. Duyvendak, J.W., & Veldboer, L. (2004). Meeting point Nederland. Over samenlevingsopbouw, multiculturaliteit en sociale cohesie. Amsterdam: Boom.
16. Edelman, E. (1977). Political language: Words that succeed and policies that fail. New York: Academic Press.
17. Engbersen, G., Snel, E., & Weltevrede, A. (2005). Sociale herovering in Amsterdam en Rotterdam. Eén verhaal over twee wijken [Social recapturing in Amsterdam and Rotterdam. One story of two neighborhoods]. WRR. Vol. 8, Verkenningen. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
18. Entzinger, H. (2003). The rise and fall of multiculturalism: The case of the Netherlands. In C. Joppke & E. Morawska (Eds.), Toward assimilation and citizenship: Immigrants in liberal nation-states (pp. 59-86). Hampshire: Palgrave.
19. Entzinger, H. (2005). Changing the rules while the game is on; From multiculturalism to assimilation in the Netherlands. In M. Bodemann & G. Yurkadul (Eds.), Migration, citizenship, ethnos: Incorporation regimes in Germany, Western Europe and North America (pp. 121-145). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
20. Favell, A. (1998). Philosophies of integration. Immigration and the idea of citizenship in France and Britain. Houndmills: Palgrave.
21. Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
22. Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organisation of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23. Guiraudon, V. (1997). Policy making behind guilded doors. Explaining the evolution of aliens' rights in France, Germany and the Netherlands, 1974-1994. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Harvard University, United States.
24. Hoppe, R. (1993). Political judgment and the policy cycle: The case of ethnicity policy arguments in the Netherlands. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 77-100). London: Duke University Press.
25. Joppke, C., & Morawska, E. (Eds.). (2004). Toward assimilation and citizenship: Immigrants in liberal nation-states. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
26. Koopmans, R. (2002). Zachte Heelmeesters. Een Vergelijking van de Resultaten van het Nederlandse en Duitse Integratiebeleid en wat de WRR daaruit niet concludeert [Soft healers. A comparison of the results of German and Dtuch integration policy and what the WRR does not conclude from that]. Migrantenstudies, 18, 87-92.
27. Koopmans, R. (2003). Good intentions sometimes make bad policy: A comparison of Dutch and German integration policies. In R. Cuperus, K. A. Duffek, & J. Kandel (Eds.), The challenge of diversity: European social democracy facing migration, integration, and multiculturalism (pp. 163-168). Innsbruck: Studien Verlag.
28. Koopmans, R., & Statham, P. (Eds.). (2000). Challenging immigration and ethnic relation politics: Comparative European perspectives. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
29. Lieberman, R.C. (2002). Political institutions and the politics of race in the development of the modern welfare state. In B. Rothstein & S. Steinmo (Eds.), Restructuring the welfare state. Political institutions and policy change (pp. 102-128). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
30. Lijphart, A. (1968). The politics of accommodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.
31. Lipsky, M. (1980). Street-level bureaucracy. Dilemmas of the individual in public services. New York: Russell Sage.
32. Lucassen, L., & Köbben, A.J.F. (1992). Het Partiële Gelijk: controverses over het onderwijs in eigen taal en cultuur en de rol daarbij van beleid en wetenschap [The partial correctness: Controversies on immigrant minorities language and culture education and the role of policy and research]. Amsterdam: Swets en Zeitlinger.
33. Municipality of Amsterdam. (2004). Wij Amsterdammers [We, the citizens of Amsterdam]. Author.
34. Municipality of Rotterdam. (2003). Rotterdam zet door. Op weg naar een stad in balans [Rotterdam holds on. Setting a course for a balanced city]. Author.
35. Municipality of Rotterdam. (2005 a). Lus di Trafiko. Over Vinden, Binden en Begeleiden van Antilliaanse Rotterdammers [Traffic light: On finding, binding and coaching antillean citizens in Rotterdam]. Author.
36. Municipality of Rotterdam. (2005 b). Meedoen of Achterblijven. Actieprogramma tegen radicalisering en voor kansen voor Rotterdammers [To participate or to lag behind. Action program against radicalization and in favor of opportunities for citizens of Rotterdam]. Author.
37. O'Toole, L.J., Jr. (2000). Research on policy implementation. Assessment and prospects. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 10, 263-288.
38. Penninx, R. (2005). Bridges between research and policy? The case of post-war immigration and integration policies in the Netherlands. International Journal on Multicultural Studies, 7, 33-48.
39. Penninx, R., Kraal, K., Martinello, M., & Vertovec, S. (Eds.). (2004). Citizenship in European cities. Immigrants, local politics and integration policies. Ashgate: Aldershot / Burlington.
40. Poppelaars, C. (2007). Resource exchange in urban governance. On the means that matter. Urban Affairs Review, 43 (1). 3-27.
41. Prins, B. (2002). Het lef om taboes te doorbreken. Nieuw realisme in het Nederlandse discours over multiculturalisme [The courage to break taboos. New realism in Dutch discourse on multiculturalism]. Migrantenstudies, 2002 (4). 241-254.
42. Rath, J. (2001). Research on immigrant ethnic minorities in the Netherlands. In P. Ratcliffe (Ed.), The politics of social science research. Race, ethnicity and social change (pp. 137-159). New York: Palgrave.
43. Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 145-166). London: Duke University Press.
44. Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1994). Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. New York: Basic Books.
45. Rittel, H.W.J., & Webber, M.M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155-169.
46. Scheffer, P. (2000, January 29). Het multiculturele drama. NRC Handelsblad.
47. Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. American Political Science Review, 87, 334-347.
48. Snel, E. (2003). De vermeende kloof tussen culturen [The alleged gap of cultures]. Enschede: Oratie, University of Twente.
49. Sniderman, P.M., Carmines, E.G., Layman, G.C., & Carter, M. (1996). Beyond race: Social justice as a race neutral idea. American Journal of Political Science, 40, 33-55.
50. Soysal, Y.N. (1994). Limits of citizenship. Migrants and postnational membership in Europe. London: The University of Chicago Press.
51. Starr, P. (1992). Social categories and claims in the liberal state. In M. Douglas & D. Hull (Eds.), How classification works: Nelson Goodman among the social sciences (pp. 154-177). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
52. Temporary Parliamentary Research Committee Integration Policy. (2004). Bruggen Bouwen [Building bridges]. The Hague, the Netherlands: Sdu Press.
53. Timmermans, A., & Scholten, P. (2006). The political flow of wisdom: Science institutions as policy venues in the Netherlands. Journal of European Public Policy, 13, 1104-1118.
54. Van Gemert, F. (2002). Marokkaanse Buurtvaders Blokkeren Integratie [Moroccan neighborhood fathers block integration]. Socialisme en Democratie, 59 (7-8). 56-64.
55. Verwey-Jonker Institute. (2004). Bronnenonderzoek. Tijdelijke Commissie Onderzoek Integratiebeleid [Sources study. Temporary research commission integration policy]. The Hague, the Netherlands: Sdu Press.
56. Vuijsje, H. (1986). Vermoorde Onschuld: Etnisch verschil als Hollands taboe [Murdered innocence: Ethnic difference as Dutch taboo]. Amsterdam: Bert Bakker.
57. Wilson, J.Q. (2000). Bureaucracy: What government agencies do and why they do it. New York: Basic Books. (Original work published 1989 )
58. Scientific Council for Government Policy. (1989). Immigrant policy. The Hague, the Netherlands: Sdu Press.
59. Scientific Council for Government Policy. (2001). The Netherlands as an immigration society. The Hague, the Netherlands: Sdu Press.
60. Scientific Council for Government Policy. (2004). Values, norms and norm-transgressing behaviour. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
61. Scientific Council for Government Policy. (2005). Vertrouwen in de buurt [Trust in the neighborhood]. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.