Effects of olfactory stimuli on arm-reaching duration

Chemical Senses

Volumn 33, Issue 5, 2008, Pages 433-440

  Tubaldi, Federico ^a   Ansuini, Caterina ^a   Demattè, M Luisa ^b   Tirindelli, Roberto ^c   Castiello, Umberto ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TRENTO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PARMA   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AIR; ALERTNESS; ARM MOVEMENT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; ODOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; SMELLING; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISUAL ORIENTATION; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ACTION POTENTIALS; ADULT; ARM; FEMALE; FRUIT; HUMANS; MALE; ODORS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REFERENCE VALUES; SMELL; STIMULATION, CHEMICAL;

EID: 45549091878     PISSN: 0379864X     EISSN: 14643553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/chemse/bjn010     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Allan RW, Zeigler HP. 1994. Autoshaping the pigeon's gape response: acquisition and topography as a function of reinforcer type and magnitude. J Exp Anal Behav. 62:201-223.
2. Barker S, Grayhem P, Koon J, Perkins J, Whalen A, Raudenbush B. 2003. Improved performance on clerical tasks associated with administration of peppermint odor. Percept Mot Skills. 97:1007-1010.
3. Castiello U. 1996. Grasping a fruit: Selection for action. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 22:582-603.
4. Castiello U. 1999. Mechanisms of selection for the control of hand action. Trends Cogn Sci. 3:264-271.
5. Castiello U, Badcock DR, Bennett KM. 1999. Sudden and gradual presentation of distractor objects: Differential interference effects. Exp Brain Res. 128:550-556.
6. Castiello U, Begliomini C. Forthcoming 2008. The cortical control of visually guided grasping. Neuroscientist.
7. Castiello U, Zucco GM, Parma V, Ansuini C, Tirindelli R. 2006. Cross-modal interactions between olfaction and vision when grasping. Chem Senses. 31:665-671.
8. Cavada C, Company T, Tejedor J, Cruz-Rizzolo RJ, Reinoso-Suárez F. 2000. The anatomical connections of the macaque monkey orbitofrontal cortex. A review. Cereb Cortex. 10:220-242.
9. Dember WN, Warm JS, Parasuraman R. 1995. Olfactory stimulation and sustained attention. In: Gilbert AN, editor. Compendium of olfactory research. Dubuque (IA): Kendall/Hunt. p. 39-46.
10. Fikes TG, Klatsky RL, Lederman SJ. 1994. Effects of object texture on precontact movement time in human prehension. J Mot Behav. 26:325-332.
11. Furr RM, Rosenthal R. 2003. Repeated-measures contrasts for "multiple-pattern" hypotheses. Psychol Methods. 8:275-293.
12. Gentilucci M, Castiello U, Corradini ML, Scarpa M, Umiltà C, Rizzolati G. 1991. Influence of different types of grasping on the transport component of prehension movements. Neuropsychologia. 29:361-378.
13. Gentilucci M, Daprati E, Gangitano M. 1998. Haptic information differentially interferes with visual analysis in reaching-grasping control and in perceptual processes. Neuroreport. 9:887-891.
14. Hummel T, Knecht M, Kobal G. 1996. Peripherally obtained electrophysiological responses to olfactory stimulation in man: electro-olfactograms exhibit a smaller degree of desensitization compared with subjective intensity estimates. Brain Res. 717:160-164.
15. Jakobson LS, Goodale MA. 1991. Factors affecting higher-order movement planning: A kinematic analysis of human prehension. Exp Brain Res. 86:199-208.
16. Jeannerod M. 1981. Specialized channels for cognitive responses. Cognition. 10:135-137.
17. Jordan MI, Wolpert DM. 1999. Computational motor control. In Gazzaniga M, editor. The Cognitive Neurosciences. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
18. Kawato M. 1999. Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 9:718-727.
19. Keppel B. 1982. Designs and analysis: A researcher's handbook. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.
20. LaMon BC, Zeigler HP. 1984. Grasping in the pigeon (Columba livia): Stimulus control during conditioned and consummatory responses. Anim Learn Behav. 12:223-231.
21. Marteniuk RG, MacKenzie CL, Jeannerod M, Athenes S, Dugas C. 1987. Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. Can J Psychol 41: 365-378.
22. Millot JL, Brand G, Morand N. 2002. Effects of ambient odors on reaction time in humans. Neurosci Lett. 322:79-82.
23. Patchay S, Castiello U, Haggard P. 2003. A cross-modal interference effect in grasping objects. Psychon Bull Rev. 10:924-931.
24. Patchay S, Haggard P, Castiello U. (2006) An object-centred reference frame for control of grasping: Effects of grasping a distractor object on visuomotor control. Exp Brain Res. 170:532-542.
25. Ploog BO, Zeigler HP. 1996. Effects of food-pellet size on rate, latency, and topography of autoshaped key pecks and gapes in pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav. 65:21-35.
26. Savelsbergh GJP, Steenbergen B, van der Kamp J. 1996. The role of fragility information in the guidance of the precision grip. Hum Mov Sci. 15: 115-128.
27. Sobel N, Johnson BN, Mainland J, Yousem DM. 2003. Functional neuroimaging of human olfaction. In: Doty RL, editor. Handbook of olfaction and gustation II. New York: Marcel Dekker. p. 263-266.
28. Stevens JP. 2002. Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences IV. Mahwah (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
29. Thompson B. 1985. Alternate methods for analyzing data from experiments. J Exp Educ. 54:50-55.
30. Tipper SP, Howard LA, Jackson SR. 1997. Selective reaching to grasp: evidence for distractor interference effects. Vis Cogn. 4:1-38.
31. Warm JS, Dember WN, Parasuraman R. 1991. Effects of olfactory stimulation on performance and stress in a visual sustained attention task. J Soc Cosmet Chem. 42:199-210.
32. Welsh T, Elliott D. 2004. Movement trajectories in the presence of a distracting stimulus: Evidence for a response activation model of selective reaching. Q J Exp Psychol A. 57:1031-1057.
33. Wolpert DM, Ghahramani Z. 2000. Computational principles of movement neuroscience. Nat Neurosci. 3:1212-1217.
34. Zahariev MA, MacKenzie CL. 2007. Grasping at 'thin air': Multimodal contact cues for reaching and grasping. Exp Brain Res. 180:69-84.