Numerical study of passive and active flow separation control over a NACA0012 airfoil

Computers and Fluids

Volumn 37, Issue 8, 2008, Pages 975-992

  Shan, Hua ^a   Jiang, Li ^a   Liu, Chaoqun ^a   Love, Michael ^b   Maines, Brant ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^b LOCKHEED MARTIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIRFOILS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; CONTROL THEORY; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD; FLOW FIELDS; FLOW OF FLUIDS; FLOW SEPARATION; FLOW SIMULATION; FLUID DYNAMICS; FLUID MECHANICS; ISOMERS; NATURAL FREQUENCIES; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMBER THEORY; NUMERICAL ANALYSIS; NUMERICAL METHODS; SEPARATION; SIZE SEPARATION; THREE DIMENSIONAL; TRANSPORT AIRCRAFT;

ACTIVE CONTROLS; CHARACTERISTIC FREQUENCIES; ELSEVIER (CO); FINITE-DIFFERENCE SCHEMES; FLOW SEPARATION CONTROL; IMMERSED BOUNDARY METHOD (IBM); MEAN FLOW FIELDS; NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS; NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS; NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS; NUMERICAL STUDIES; SEPARATED SHEAR LAYERS; SEPARATION ZONE; SINUSOIDAL FORCING; SPATIAL DERIVATIVES; THREE DIMENSIONAL (3D); THREE-DIMENSIONAL (3D) STRUCTURING; VORTEX GENERATORS; VORTEX GENERATORS (VG);

VORTEX FLOW;

EID: 45449113427     PISSN: 00457930     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compfluid.2007.10.010     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Alam M., and Sandham N.D. Direct numerical simulation of 'short' laminar separation bubbles with turbulent reattachment. J Fluid Mech 410 (2000) 1-28
2. Armaly B.F., Durst F., Pereira J.C.F., and Schonung B. Experimental and theoretical investigation of backward-facing step flow. J Fluid Mech 127 (1983) 473-496
3. Arthurs K.M., Moore L.C., Peskin C.S., and Pitman F.B. Modeling arteriolar flow and mass transport using the immersed boundary method. J Comput Phys 147 (1998) 402
4. Bertolotti F.P., Herbert T., and Spallart P.R. Linear and nonlinear stability of the Blasius boundary layer. J Fluid Mech 242 (1992) 441-474
5. Boiko A.V., Grek G.R., Dovgal A.V., and Kozlov V.V. The Origin of Turbulence in Near-Wall Flows (2002), Springer
6. Bons J.P., Sondergarrd R., and Rivir R.B. Turbine Separation Control Using Pulsed Vortex Generator Jets. Journal of Turbomachinery 123 (2001) 198-206
7. Casper J, Lin JC, Yao CS. Effect of sub-boundary layer vortex generators on incident turbulence. AIAA Paper 2003;2003-4162.
8. Coutanceau M., and Bouard R. Experimental determination of the main features of the viscous flow in a wake of a circular cylinder in uniform translation. Part 1. Steady flow. J Fluid Mech 79 (1977) 231-256
9. Drazin P.G., and Reid W.H. Hydrodynamic stability (1981), Cambridge University Press
10. Fornberg B. A numerical study of steady viscous flow past a circular cylinder. J Fluid Mech 98 (1980) 819-855
11. Gad-el_Hak M. Flow control, passive, active, and reactive flow management (2000), Cambridge University Press
12. Godard G., and Stanislas M. Control of a decelerating boundary layer. Part 1: Optimization of passive vortex generators. Aerospace Sci Technol 10 (2006) 181-191
13. Goldstein D., Handler R., and Sirovich L. Direct numerical simulation of the burbulent flow over a modeled riblet covered surface. J Fluid Mech 302 (1995) 333
14. Greenblatt D., and Wygnanski I.J. The control of flow separation by periodic excitation. Prog Aerospace Sci 36 (2000) 487-545
15. Grigoriadis D.G.E., Bartzis J.G., and Goulas A. LES of the flow past a rectangular cylinder using the immersed boundary concept. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 41 6 (2003) 615-632
16. Hutchines N, Choi K-S. Experimental investigation of turbulence suppression by the imposition of a large-scale vortical control flow. AIAA Paper 2001; 2001-2775.
17. Jiang L, Shan H, Liu C. Direct numerical simulation of boundary-layer receptivity for subsonic flow around airfoil. In: Recent advances in DNS and LES, proceedings of the second AFOSR (Air Force Office of Scientific Research) international conference, Rutgers, New Jersey, June 7-9, 1999.
18. Jiang L, Shan H, Liu C, Visbal MR. Nonreflecting boundary conditions for DNS in curvilinear coordinates. In: Recent advances in DNS and LES, proceedings of the Second AFOSR (Air Force Office of Scientific Research) international conference, Rutgers, New Jersey, June 7-9, 1999.
19. Jiang L, Liu C. Direct numerical simulation for flow separation control with pulsed jets. AIAA Paper 2003; 2003-0611.
20. Kerho M, Kramer B. Enhanced airfoil design incorporating boundary layer mixing devices. AIAA Paper 2003; 2003-0211.
21. Lin J.C. Review of research on low-profile vortex generators to control boundary-layer separation. Prog Aerospace Sci 38 (2002) 389-420
22. Linnick M, Fasel H. A high-order immersed boundary method for unsteady incompressible flow calculations. AIAA Paper 2003; 2003-1124.
23. Mittal R., and Iaccarino G. Immersed boundary methods. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 37 (2005) 239-261
24. Mittal R, Kotapati RB. Numerical study of resonant interactions and flow control in a canonical separated flow, AIAA Paper 2005; 2005-1261.
25. Nagib H, Kiedaisch J, Greenblatt D, Wygnanski I, Hassan A. Effective flow control for rotorcraft applications at flight mach numbers, AIAA Paper 2001; 2001-2974.
26. Osborn RF, Kota S, Geister D, Lee M, Tilmann C. Active flow control using high frequency compliant structures. AIAA Paper 2001; 2001-4144.
27. Patel MP, Carver R, Lisy FJ, Prince TS, Ng T. Detection and control of flow separation using pressure sensors and miro-vortex generators. AIAA Paper 2002; 2002-0268.
28. Peskin C.S. Flow patters around heart valves: a numerical method. J Comput Phys 10 (1972) 252
29. Saiki E.M., and Biringen S. Spatial numerical simulation of boundary layer transition: effects of a spherical particle. J Fluid Mech 345 (1997) 133
30. Schubauer G.B., and Spangenberg W.G. Forced mixing in boundary layers. J Fluid Mech 8 (1960) 10-32
31. Shan H., Jiang L., and Liu C. Numerical investigation of compressible separated flow around an NACA 0012 airfoil at 12° angle of attack. Comput Fluid Dyn J 9 2 (2000) 96-104
32. Shan H., Jiang L., and Liu C. Direct numerical simulation of flow separation around a NACA 0012 Airfoil. Comput Fluids 34 (2005) 1096-1114
33. Shan H, Jiang L, Liu C, Love M, Maines B. Numerical simulation of time-dependent flow behind a pair of active vortex generators, AIAA Paper 2005; 2005-5018.
34. Shizawa T, Mizusaki Y. Response of time-depended flowfield structure behind an active vortex generators pair. AIAA Paper 2004-427.
35. Shizawa T, Mizusaki Y. Response of phase-averaged flowfield of longitudinal vortices to the height of active vortex generators pair. AIAA Paper 2005-4885.
36. Taylor HD. The elimination of diffuser separation by vortex generators. United Aircraft Corporation Report No. R-4012-3 1947.
37. Yang Z.Y., and Voke P.R. Large-eddy simulation of boundary-layer separation and transition at a change of surface curvature. J Fluid Mech 439 (2001) 305-333
38. Von Terzi DA, Linnick MN, Seidel J, Fasel HF. Immersed boundary techniques for high-order finite difference methods, AIAA Paper 2001; 2001-2918.
39. Yarusevych S., Kawall J.G., and Sullivan P.E. Effect of acoustic excitation on airfoil performance at low Reynolds numbers. AIAA J 41 (2003) 1599-1601
40. Yarusevych S., Sullivan P.E., and Kawall J.G. Airfoil boundary layer separation and control at low Reynolds numbers. Exp Fluids 38 (2005) 545-547
41. Yoon S., and Kwak D. Implicit Navier-Stokes solver for three-dimensional compressible flows. AIAA J 30 (1992) 2653-2659