Enacting protocols by commitment concession

Proceedings of the International Conference on Autonomous Agents

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 116-123

  Yolum, Pinar ^a   Singh, Munindar P ^b  

^a BOGAZICI UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b North Carolina State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentation; Communication: protocols

Indexed keywords

ARGUMENTATION; COMMITMENT PROTOCOLS; HETEROGENEOUS AGENTS; INFERENCE RULES; LOCAL POLICIES;

FUZZY CLUSTERING;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 45449096030     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1329125.1329158     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (12)

1. M. Alberti, M. Gavanelli, E. Lamma, P. Mello, and P. Torroni. Modeling interactions using social integrity constraints: A resource sharing case study. In Proc. Intl. Workshop on Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT), LNAI 2990, pages 243-262. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
2. C. Castelfranchi. Commitments: From individual intentions to groups and organizations. In Proc. AAAI-93 Workshop on Aland Theories of Groups and Organizations: Conceptual and Empirical Research, 1993.
3. U. Endriss. Monotonic concession protocols for multilateral negotiation. In Proc. 5th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS-06), pages 392-399. ACM Press, May 2006.
4. R. A. Flores and R. C. Kremer. A principled modular approach to construct, flexible conversation protocols. In Proc. Canadian Conference on Al, LNCS 3060, pages 1-15. Springer-Verlag, 2004.
5. N. C. Karunatillake, N. R. Jennings, I. Rahwan, and T. J. Norman. Argument-based negotiation in a social context. In Proc. AAMAS Works/top on Argumentation, pages 74-88, May 2005.
6. P. McBurney and S. Parsons. Posit spaces: a performative model of e-commerce. In Proc. the 2nd Intl. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pages 624-631. ACM Press, 2003.
7. P. Pasquier and B. Chaib-draa. Modelling the links between social commitments and individual intentions. In Proc. 5th Intl. Joint Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 1372-1374. ACM Press, May 2006.
8. J. S. Rosenschein and G. Zlotkin. Rules of Encounter. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 1994.
9. M. P. Singh. An ontology for commitments in multiagent systems: Toward a unification of normative concepts. Artificial Intelligence and Law, 7:97-113, 1999.
10. F. Wan and M. P. Singh. Formalizing and achieving multiparty agreements via commitments. In Proc. of the 4th Intl. Joint Conf, on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS), pages 770-777. ACM Press, 2005.
11. M. Winikoff, W. Liu, and J. Harland. Enhancing commitment machines. In Proc. 2nd Intl. Workshop Declarative Agent Languages and Technologies (DALT), LNAI3476, pages 198-220. Springer-Verlag, 2005.
12. P. Yolum and M. P. Singh. Flexible protocol specification and execution: Applying event calculus planning using commitments. In Proc. 1st Intl. Joint Conf Autonomous Agents and MultiAgent Systems (AAMAS), pages 527-534. ACM Press, 2002.