Nitinol in magnetic resonance imaging

Minimally Invasive Therapy and Allied Technologies

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 261-271

  Melzer, Andreas ^a,b   Michitsch, St ^a   Konak, St ^a   Schaefers, G ^c   Bertsch, Th ^c  

^a WESTPHALIAN UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES   (Germany)

^b St Marien Hospital Buer   (Germany)

^c MR:comp GmbH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Anastomosis device; Interventional instruments; MRI compatibility; Nitinol; Stents; Vena cava filter

Indexed keywords

NITINOL;

ANASTOMOSIS; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; ARTIFACT REDUCTION; CANNULA; CARDIOVASCULAR EQUIPMENT; CATHETER; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION; GUIDE WIRE; HEART ATRIUM SEPTUM DEFECT; IMAGE QUALITY; IMPLANT; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MAGNETIC FIELD; MATERIAL COATING; MATERIALS TESTING; MEDICAL INSTRUMENTATION; MEDICAL SOCIETY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SAFETY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STENT; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT; UNITED STATES; VENA CAVA FILTER;

EID: 4544384624     PISSN: 13645706     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13645700410020269     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Melzer A, Stöckel D. Using shape-memory alloys. Med Dev Techn 1995;1:16-23.
2. Shellock FG, Kanal E. Magnetic resonance bio effects, safety, and patient management. Raven Press, New York, 1994.
3. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R, Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 1985; 3:329-43.
4. Bakker CJG, Bhagwandien R, Meorland MA, Fuderer M. Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: The cylinder model revisited. Magn Res Imag 1993;11:539-48.
5. Melzer A. Seibel R. MR Guided Therapy of Spinal Diseases. Min Inv Ther All Techn 1999;3:92-7.
6. Concise science dictionary, Oxford University Press, New York, 1996;p. 708.
7. Klemm T, Duda S, Machann J, Seekamp-Rahn K et al. MR imaging in the presence of vascular stents: a systematic assessment of artifacts for various stent orientations, sequence types, and field strengths. J Magn Reson Imag 2000;12:606-15.
8. Ludeke KM, Roschmann P, Tischler R. Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging. Magn Reson Imag 1985;3: 329-43.
9. Bakker CJ, Bhagwandien R, Moerland MA, Fuderer M. Susceptibility artifacts in 2DFT spin-echo and gradient-echo imaging: the cylinder model revisited. Magn Reson Imag 1993;11:539.
10. Schenck JF. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 1996;23: 815-50.
11. Melzer A, Stöckel D, Busch M et al. MR-Compatible instruments for interventional MRI. In: Lufkin RB (ed.). Interventional MRI, Mosby, New York, 1999:55-69.
12. Haacke EM, Brown RW, Thompson MR, Venkatesan R. Magnetic resonance imaging, physical principles and sequence design. Wiley-Liss, New York; 1999.
13. Evans AJ, Blinder RA, Herfkens RJ, Spritzer et al. Effects of turbulence on signal intensity in gradient echo images. Invest Radiol 1988;23:512-8.
14. Fabregues S, Baijens K, Rieu R, Bergeron P. Hemodynamics of endovascular prostheses. J Biomech 1998;31:45-54.
15. Muller HS, Schwarzenberg H, Wesner F, Drost R et al. Visualization of flow patterns from stents and stent-grafts in an in vitro flow-model. Invest Radiol 1998;33: 762-70.
16. Bartels LW, Smits HF, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. MR imaging of vascular stents: effects of susceptibility, flow, and radiofrequency eddy currents. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001;12:365-71.
17. Camacho CR, Plewes DB, Henkelman RM. Non-susceptibility artifacts due to metallic objects in MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imag 1995;5:75-88.
18. Bartels LW, Bakker CJ, Viergever MA. Improved lumen visualization in metallic vascular implants by reducing RIF artifacts. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:171-80.
19. Teitelbaum GP, Ortega HV, Vinitsky S et al. Low-artifact intravascular devices: MR imaging evaluation. Radiology 1988;168:713-9.
20. Teitelbaum GP, Bradley WG Jr, Klein BD. MR imaging artifacts, ferromagnetism, and magnetic torque of intravascular filters, stems and coils. Radiology 1988; 166:657-664.
21. Cragg AH, De Jong SC, Barnhart WH, Landas SK et al. Nitinol intravascular stents: results of preclinical evaluation. Radiology 1993;189:775-8.
22. Matsumoto AH, Teitelbaum GP, Carvlin MJ, Barth KH et al. Gadolinium enhanced MR imaging of vascular stents. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1990;14:357-61.
23. Link J, Steffens JC, Brossmann J, Graessner J et al. Iliofemoral arterial occlusive disease: contrast-enhanced MR angiography for preinterventional evaluation and follow-up after stent placement. Radiology 1999;212:371-7.
24. Taylor DJ, Brown G, Magnetic resonance imaging of vascular stents. Proc. Intl Soc Magn Reson Med 1999; 7:1892.
25. Hilfiker PR, Quick HH, Debatin JF. Plain and covered stent-grafts: in vitro evaluation of characteristics at three dimensional MR angiography. Radiology 1999; 211:693-7.
26. Hilfiker PR, Quick HH, Schmidt M, Debatin JF. In vitro image characteristics of an abdominal aortic stent graft: CTA versus 3D MRA. MAGMA 1999;8:27-32.
27. Klemm Th, Duda St., Machman J. MR Imaging in the Presence of Vascular Stents: A Systematic Assessment of Artifacts for Various Stent Orientations, Sequence Types and Field Strengths. JMRI 2000;12: 606-15.
28. Bertsch Th, Schaefers G, Busch MM, Melzer A. Inductively coupled active MRI stents CARS 2001 Proceedings, International Congresse Series 1230. 2001:1057-61.
29. Kivelitz D, Wagner S, Schnorr J, Busch M et al. A vascular stent as an active component for locally enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: Initial in vivo imaging results after catheter-guided placement in rabbits. Invest Radiol 2003;38:147-52.
30. Rousseau H, Perreault P, Otal P, Stockx L et al. The 6-F nitinol TrapEase inferior vena cava filter: results of a prospective multicenter trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2001; 12:299-304.
31. Reekers JA, Hoogeveen YL, Wijnands M, Bosma G et al. Evaluation of the retrievability of the OptEase IVC filter in an animal model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2004;15: 261-7.
32. Watanabe AT, Teitelbaum GP, Gomes AS, Roehm JO Jr. MR imaging of the bird's nest filter. Radiology 1990; 177:578-9.
33. Kim D, Edelman RR, Margolin CJ, Porter DH et al. The Simon nitinol filter: evaluation by MR and ultrasound. Angiology 1992;43:541-8.
34. Bartels LW, Bos C, van Der Weide R, Smits HF et al. Placement of an inferior vena cava filter in a pig guided by high-resolution MR fluoroscopy at 1.5 T. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;12:599-605.
35. Schaefers G, Zylka W, Busch M, Melzer A. Wireless application of an intravascular resonator within the Vena Cava for MRI CARS 2001 Proceedings, International Congress Series, 2001;1230:1062-7.
36. Krumsdorf U, Ostermayer S, Billinger K, Trepels T et al. Incidence and clinical course of thrombus formation on atrial septal defect and patient foramen ovale closure devices in 1,000 consecutive patients. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;43:302-9.
37. Petersen SE, Voigtlander T, Kreitner KF, Kalden P et al. Quantification of shunt volumes in congenital heart diseases using a breath-hold MR phase contrast technique - comparison with oximetry, Int J Cardiovasc Imaging 2002;18:53-60.
38. Bonilla LF, Sullivan DJ. New Approaches for Vascular Anastomoses. Curr Interv Cardiol Rep 2001;3:44-9.
39. Traverse JH, Mooney MR, Pedersen WR, Madison JD. et al. Clinical, angiographic, and interventional follow-up of patients with aortic-saphenous vein graft connectors. Circulation 2003;108:452-6.
40. Reuthebuch O, Kadner A, Lachat M, Kunzli A et al. Early bypass occlusion after deployment of nitinol connector devices. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2004; 127:1421-6.
41. Pederson B, Tesoro D, Wertheimer SJ, Coraci M. Mitek Anchor System: a new technique for tenodesis and ligamentous repair of the foot and ankle. J Foot Surg 1991;30:48-51.
42. Melzer A, Schmidt A, Triebe A, Seibel R. CT and MR Imaging Guided Laser Decompression of Lumbar Spinal Disc Hernation: With a New Deflectable Cannula, Radiology Suppl Scientific Program RSNA 1997:315.
43. Kee ST, Rhee JS, Butts K, Daniel B et al. MR-guided transjugular portosystemic shunt placement in a swine model. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999;10:529-35.
44. Nolte-Ernsting CC, Bucker A, Neuerburg JM, Glowinski A et al. Imaging-guided percutaneous nephrostomy and use of MR-compatible catheters in the nondilated porcine urinary tract. J Vasc Interv Radiol 1999; 10: 1305-14.
45. Omary RA, Frayne R, Unal O, Warner T et al. MR-guided angioplasty of renal artery stenosis in a pig model: a feasibility study. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2000;11:373-81.
46. Homer MJ, Pile-Spellman ER. Needle localization of occult breast lesions with a curved-end retractable wire: technique and pitfalls. Radiology 1986;161:547-8.
47. O'Leary JP, Nicholson J, Gattuma R. In: T. Duerig et al. (eds), Engineering Aspects of Shape Memory Alloys, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, UK, 1990:477.
48. Gorczyca DP, DeBruhl ND, Sullenberger PC, Farria D et al. Wire localization of breast lesions before biopsy: use of an MR-compatible device in phantoms and cadavers. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1995;165:835-8.
49. Lampe D, Hefler L, Alberich T, Sittek H et al. The clinical value of preoperative wire localization of breast lesions by magnetic resonance imaging - a multicenter study. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2002;75:175-9.
50. Morris EA, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Kaplan JB et al. Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2002; 178: 1211-20.