Consistency in ordinal data analysis I

Mathematical social sciences

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 79-113

  Herden, Gerhard ^a   Pallack, Andreas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF DUISBURG ESSEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Compatibility; Continuous preorder; Goodness criterion; Heterogeneity function; Point homogeneous group

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544384459     PISSN: 01654896     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0165-4896(01)00081-6     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Baulieu, F.B., 1997. Two variant axiom systems for presence/absence based dissimilarity coefficients. Journal of Classification 14, 159-170.
2. Bock, H.H., 1974. In: Automatische Klassifikation. Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht, Göttingen.
3. Debreu, G., 1954. Representation of a preference ordering by a numerical function. In: Thrall, R., Coombs, C., Davis, R. (Eds.), Decision Processes. Wiley, New York, pp. 159-166.
4. Debreu, G., 1964. Continuity properties of paretian utility. International Economic Review 5, 285-293.
5. Engelhard, G., Wilson, M. (Eds.), 1996. Objective measurement: Theory into practice, Vol. 3. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.
6. Everitt, B.S., 1974. In: Cluster Analysis. Heinemann, London.
7. Ghiselli, E.E., Campbell, J.P., Zedeck, S., 1981. In: Measurement Theory For the Behavioural Sciences. Freeman, San Francisco, CA.
8. Glass, A.M.W., 1981. Ordered permutation groups. In: London Math. Soc. Lecture Note Series, Vol. 55. Cambridge.
9. Hartigan, J.A., 1975. In: Clustering Algorithms. Wiley, New York.
10. Herden, G., 1986. Goodness-criteria and mean heterogeneity. In: Gaul, W., Schader, M. (Eds.), Classification as a Tool of Research. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp. 201-208.
11. Herden, G., 1987. Dissimilarity coefficients for ordinally scaled data. Studien zur Klassifikation 17, 270-278.
12. Herden, G., 1989. Cluster methods for qualitative data. In: Opitz, O. (Ed.), Conceptual and Numerical Analysis of Data. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 105-115.
13. Herden, G., 1990. Dissimilarity coefficients which are independent of a special set of data. Mathematical Social Sciences 20, 73-90.
14. Herden, G., 1991. On cluster methods for qualitative data II. In: Bock, H.H., Ihm, P. (Eds.), Classification, Data Analysis, And Knowledge Organization. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 14-22.
15. Herden, G., 1993. Some aspects of qualitative data analysis. Mathematical Social Sciences 26, 105-138.
16. Herden, G., Mehta, G.B., 2001. Order, topology and utility. Preprint, University of Essen, Essen, Germany.
17. Herden, G., Pallack, A., 2001a. Consistency in ordinal data analysis II. Preprint, University of Essen, Essen, Germany.
18. Herden, G., Pallack, A., 2001b. Consistency in ordinal data analysis III. Preprint, University of Essen, Essen, Germany.
19. Hubert, L.J., 1972. Some extensions of Johnson's hierarchical clustering algorithms. Psychometrika 37, 261-274.
20. Hubert, L.J., 1973. Monotone invariant clustering procedures. Psychometrika 38, 47-62.
21. Hubert, L.J., 1974. Some applications of graph theory to clustering. Psychometrika 39, 283-309.
22. Hubert, L.J., 1977. A set theoretical approach to the problem of hierarchical clustering. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 15, 70-88.
23. Janowitz, M.F., 1978a. An order theoretic model for cluster analysis. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 34, 55-72.
24. Janowitz, M.F., 1978b. Semiflat L-cluster methods. Discrete Mathematics 21, 47-60.
25. Janowitz, M.F., 1979a. Monotone equivariant cluster methods. SIAM Journal of Applied Mathematics 37, 148-165.
26. Janowitz, M.F., 1979b. Preservation of global order equivalence. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 20, 78-88.
27. Janowitz, M.F., 1980. In: Applications of the Theory of Partially Ordered Sets To Cluster Analysis, Vol. 9. Universal Algebra and Applications, Banach Center Publications, pp. 305-319.
28. Janowitz, M.F., 1981. Continuous L-cluster methods. Discrete Applied Mathematics 3, 107-112.
29. Jardine, N., Sibson, R., 1968a. A model for taxonomy. Mathematical Biosciences 2, 465-482.
30. Jardine, N., Sibson, R., 1968b. The construction of hierarchic and non-hierarchic classifications. Computer Journal 11, 177-184.
31. Jardine, N., Sibson, R., 1971. In: Mathematical Taxonomy. Wiley, New York.
32. Kruskal, J.B., 1964a. Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis. Psychometrika 29, 1-27.
33. Kruskal, J.B., 1964b. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling: a numerical method. Psychometrika 29, 115-129.
34. Mathar, R., 1989. Algorithms in multidimensional scaling. In: Opitz, O. (Ed.), Conceptual and Numerical Analysis of Data. Springer, Heidelberg, pp. 159-177.
35. Mathar, R., 1990. Multidimensional scaling with constraints on the configuration. Journal of Multivariate Analysis 33, 151-156.
36. Mathar, R., 1997. In: Multidimensionale Skalierung. Teubner, Stuttgart.
37. Mehta, G.B., 1995. Metric utility functions. Journal of Economic Behaviour and Organization 26, 289-298.
38. Mehta, G.B., Monteiro, P.K., 1996. Infinite-dimensional utility representation theorems. Economics Letters 53, 169-173.
39. Munkres, J., 1987. In: Topology - A First Course. Prentice-Hall of India, New Delhi.
40. Narens, L., 1985. In: Abstract Measurement Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
41. Neuefeind, W., Trockel, W., 1995. Continuous linear representability of binary relations. Economic Theory 6, 351-356.
42. Opitz, O., 1980. In: Numerische Taxonomie. Fischer, Stuttgart.
43. Orth, B., 1974. In: Einführung in die Theorie des Messens. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart.
44. Orth, B., 1983. Grundlagen des Messens. In: Feger, H., Bredenkamp, J. (Eds.), Messen und Testen; Enzyklopädie der Psychologie, Themenbereich B: Methodologie und Methoden, Serie 1: Forschungsmethoden der Psychologie, Band 3. Hogrefe, Göttingen, pp. 136-180.
45. Pfanzagl, J., 1971. In: Theory of Measurement. Physica Verlag, Würzburg.
46. Roberts, F., 1979. In: Measurement Theory. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
47. Sibson, R., 1970. A model for taxonomy II. Mathematical Biosciences 6, 405-430.
48. Sibson, R., 1972. Order invariant methods for data analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B 34, 311-349.
49. Sibson, R., 1973. SLINK: an optimally efficient algorithm for the single-link cluster method. Computer Journal 16, 30-34.
50. Späth, H., 1980. In: Cluster Analysis Algorithms For Data Reduction and Classification of Objects. Halsted, New York.
51. Späth, H., 1985. In: Cluster Dissection and Analysis. Horwood, Chichester.
52. Steinhausen, D., Langer, K., 1977. In: Clusteranalyse. de Gruyter, Berlin.
53. Suppes, P., Krantz D.H Luce, R.D., Tversky, A., 1971. In: Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 1. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
54. Suppes, P., Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Tversky, A., 1989. In: Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 2. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
55. Suppes, P., Krantz, D.H., Luce, R.D., Tversky, A., 1990. In: Foundations of Measurement, Vol. 3. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
56. Torgerson, W.S., 1952. Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method. Psychometrika 17, 401-419.
57. Torgerson, W.S., 1958. In: Theory and Methods of Scaling. Wiley, New York.
58. Trockel, W., 1992. An alternative proof for the linear utility representation theorem. Economic Theory 2, 298-302.
59. Ward, J.H., 1963. Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. Journal of the American Statistical Association 58, 236-244.
60. Wille, R., 1993. Oral Communication on Occasion of a Meeting in Düsseldorf, Germany.
61. Wilson, M. (Ed.), 1992. Objective Measurement: Theory Into Practice, Vol. 1. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.
62. Wilson, M. (Ed.), 1994. Objective Measurement: Theory Into Practice, Vol. 2. Ablex Publishing Corporation, Norwood, NJ.