Effect of magnetic field gradients induced by microvasculature on NMR measurements of molecular self-diffusion in biological tissues

Journal of Magnetic Resonance

Volumn 170, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 228-235

  Kiselev, V G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Apparent diffusion coefficient; Contrast agent; Diffusion; Heterogeneous media; Vascular network

Indexed keywords

BLOOD VESSELS; BRAIN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CORRELATION METHODS; DIFFUSION; MAGNETIC FIELDS; MAGNETIC SUSCEPTIBILITY; MAGNETIZATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE;

APPARENT DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; CONTRAST AGENTS; HETEROGENEOUS MEDIA; VASCULAR NETWORKS;

TISSUE;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DIFFUSION; METHODOLOGY; MICROCIRCULATION; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; SIGNAL PROCESSING;

CONTRAST MEDIA; DIFFUSION; MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; MICROCIRCULATION; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED;

EID: 4544379595     PISSN: 10907807     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmr.2004.07.004     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. J. Zhong, R.P. Kennan, J.C. Gore, Effects of susceptibility variations on NMR measurements of diffusion, J. Magn. Reson. 95 (1991) 267-280.
2. M.D. Does, J. Zhong, J.G. Gore, In vivo measurement of ADC change due to intravascular susceptibility variation, Magn. Reson. Med. 41 (1999) 236-240.
3. R.F. Karlicek, I.J. Lowe, A modified pulsed gradient technique for measuring diffusion in the presence of large background gradients, J. Magn. Reson. 37 (1980) 75.
4. K.A. Il'yasov, J. Hennig, Single shot RARE sequence with multiple diffusion weighted preparation period: reduction of the artifacts and the sensitivity to background gradients, Proc. Int. Soc. Magn. Reson. Med. Sidney (1998) 657.
5. D.A. Yablonskiy, E.M. Haacke, Theory of NMR signal behavior in magnetically inhomogeneous tissue: the static dephasing regime, Magn. Reson. Med. 32 (1994) 749-763.
6. V.G. Kiselev, S. Posse, Analytical theory of susceptibility induced NMR signal dephasing in a cerebrovascular network, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998) 5696-5699.
7. V.G. Kiselev, S. Posse, Analytical model of susceptibility-induced MR signal dephasing: effect of diffusion in a micrcvascular network, Magn. Reson. Med. 41 (1999) 499-509.
8. Le Bihan D, Turner R, Patronas N. Diffusion MR imaging in normal brain and in brain tumor. In book [16].
9. 2*, and non-Lorenzian signal behavior, Magn. Reson. Med. 45 (2001) 533-542.
10. V.G. Kiselev, On the theoretical basis of perfusion measurements by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI, Magn. Reson. Med. 46 (2001) 1113-1122.
11. E.O. Stejskal, J.E. Tanner, Spin diffusion measurements: spin echos in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient, J. Chem. Phys. 42 (1965) 288-292.
12. G. Pawlik, A. Rackl, R.J. Bing, Quantitative capillary topography and blood flow in the cerebral cortex of cats: an in vivo microscopic study, Brain Res. 208 (1981) 35-58.
13. V.G. Kiselev, D.S. Novikov, Transverse NMR relaxation as a probe of mesoscopic structure, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002) 278101.
14. V.G. Kiselev, D.S. Novikov, Kiselev and Novikov reply, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 029802 (A Reply to the Comment by Y.-Q. Song and P.N. Sen. Ibid, 029801).
15. V.G. Kiselev, D.S. Novikov, Kiselev and Novikov reply, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91 (2003) 029802 (A Reply to the Comment by Y.-Q. Song and P.N. Sen. Ibid, 029801).
16. P.P. Mitra, P.N. Sen, L.M. Schwartz, P. Le Doussaland, Diffusion propagator as a probe of the structure of porous media, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 3555-3558.
17. D. Le Bihan, R. Turner, N. Patronas, Diffusion MR imaging in normal brain and in brain tumor, in: D. Le Bihan (Ed.), Diffusion and Perfusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Applications to Functional MRI, Raven Press, New York, 1995, pp. 134-140.
18. D.A. Yablonskiy, A.L. Sukstanskii, J.C. Leawoods, D.S. Gierada, G.L, Bretthorst, S.S. Lefrak, J.D. Cooper, M.S. Conradi, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 (2002) 3111-3116.