|
Volumn 39, Issue 9, 2004, Pages 910-911
|
Should we exclude individuals from endoscopy based exclusively on the absence of alarm symptoms?
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
PEPSINOGEN I;
PEPSINOGEN II;
ANAMNESIS;
ATROPHIC GASTRITIS;
CANCER DIAGNOSIS;
CHRONIC GASTRITIS;
CLINICAL FEATURE;
DYSPEPSIA;
DYSPLASIA;
FOLLOW UP;
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY;
HUMAN;
LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS;
LETTER;
OBSERVER VARIATION;
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION;
PRIORITY JOURNAL;
SEROLOGY;
STOMACH CANCER;
STOMACH DISEASE;
SYMPTOMATOLOGY;
BIOPSY, NEEDLE;
COHORT STUDIES;
DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL;
DYSPEPSIA;
FEMALE;
GASTRIC MUCOSA;
GASTRITIS, ATROPHIC;
GASTROSCOPY;
HUMANS;
IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY;
MALE;
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION;
RISK ASSESSMENT;
SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX;
STOMACH NEOPLASMS;
|
EID: 4544367101
PISSN: 00365521
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1080/00365520410003317 Document Type: Letter |
Times cited : (2)
|
References (5)
|