Predictions of micelle-water partition coefficients and retention in micellar electrokinetic chromatography from solute structure. 2. Fragmental constant approach

Analytical Chemistry

Volumn 76, Issue 18, 2004, Pages 5451-5458

  Burns, Scott T ^a   Khaledi, Morteza G ^a,b  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBOXYLIC ACIDS; CHROMATOGRAPHY; LINEAR SYSTEMS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; WATER;

ALIPHATIC COMPOUNDS; FRAGMENTAL CONSTANT APPROACH (FCA); FRAGMENTATION CONSTANT; WATER-SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE (SDS);

MICELLES;

ALIPHATIC COMPOUND; WATER;

ARTICLE; ATOM; BIOAVAILABILITY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIFFUSION COEFFICIENT; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; FRAGMENTATION REACTION; MICELLAR ELECTROKINETIC CHROMATOGRAPHY; MICELLE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR INTERACTION; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PARTITION COEFFICIENT; SOLUTE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS;

CHROMATOGRAPHY, MICELLAR ELECTROKINETIC CAPILLARY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; HYDROCARBONS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; MOLECULAR STRUCTURE; SODIUM DODECYL SULFATE; SOLUBILITY; WATER;

EID: 4544360782     PISSN: 00032700     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ac0498718     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Terabe, S.; Otsuka, K.; Ando, T. Anal. Chem. 1985, 57, 834.
2. Khaledi, M. G. Micellar Electrokinetic Chromatography. In High Performance Capillary Electrophoresis: Theory, Techniques, and Applications; Khaledi, M. G., Ed.; Wiley: New York, 1998; Chapter 3.
3. (a) Leo, A.; Hansch, C.; Elkins, D. Chem. Rev. 1971, 71, 525.
4. (b) Hansch, C.; Leo, A. Substituent Constants for Correlation Analysis in Chemistry and Biology; John Wiley: New York, 1979.
5. (c) Leo, A. J. Methods Enzymol. 1991, 202, 544-591.
6. (d) Leo, A. J. Chem. Rev. 1993, 93, 1281-1306.
7. (a) Rekker, R. F. The Hydrophobic Fragmental Constant. Its Derivation and Application; Library Vol. 1, Elsevier: Amsterdam, 1977.
8. (b) Rekker, R. F.; Mannhold, R. Calculation of Drug Lipophilicity. The Hydrophobic Fragmental Constant Approach; VCH: Weinheim, 1992.
9. (c) Mannhold, R.; Rekker, R. F.; Dross, K.; Bijloo, G.; de Vries, D. Quart. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1998, 17, 517-536.
10. (d) Mannhold, R.; Rekker, R. F. Perspect. Drug Discovery Des. 2000, 18, 1-18.
11. Terabe, S.; Katsura, T.; Okada, Y.; Ishihama, Y.; Otsuka, K. J. Microcolumn Sep. 1993, 5, 23.
12. Trone, M.; Khaledi, M. G. Anal. Chem. 1999, 71, 1270-1277.
13. (a) Yang, S.; Khaledi, M. G. Anal. Chem. 1995, 67. 499-510.
14. (b) Quina, F. H.; Alonso, E. O.; Farah, P. S. J. Phys. Chem. 1995, 99, 11708.
15. (c) Abraham, M. H.; Chadha, H. S.; Dixon, J. P.; Raflos, C.; Treiner, C. J. Chem. Soc., Perkin. Trans. 2 1995, 887.
16. (d) Vitha, M. F.; Dallas A. J.; Carr, P. W. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 1997, 187, 179-183.
17. (e) Trone, M. D.; Khaledi, M. G. J. Chromatogr., A 2000, 886, 245-257.
18. Mack, J. P.; Fu, C.; Khaledi, M. G. Unpublished results.
19. Kelly, K. A.; Burns, S. T.; Khaledi, M. G. Anal. Chem. 2001, 73, 6057-6062.
20. Burns, S. T.; Khaledi, M. G. Unpublished results.