The influence of a nonlinear resistance element upon in vitro aortic pressure tracings and aortic valve motions

ASAIO Journal

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 498-502

  Scharfschwerdt, Michael ^a   Misfeld, Martin ^a   Sievers, Hans H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARDIOLOGY; FLOW OF FLUIDS; FREQUENCIES; HEART VALVE PROSTHESES; PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; WAVEFORM ANALYSIS;

AORTIC VALVES; NONLINEAR RESISTANCE; VASCULAR SYSTEMS; WINDKESSEL FUNCTIONS;

CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEM;

ANIMAL TISSUE; AORTA PRESSURE; AORTA VALVE PROSTHESIS; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FLOW KINETICS; HEART RATE; NONHUMAN; NONLINEAR SYSTEM; SYSTOLE; VIDEORECORDING;

ANIMALS; AORTIC VALVE; BLOOD PRESSURE; MODELS, CARDIOVASCULAR; SWINE; VASCULAR RESISTANCE;

EID: 4544360317     PISSN: 10582916     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.MAT.0000137038.03251.35     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. O'Rourke MF: Vascular mechanics in the clinic. J Biomech 36: 623-630, 2003.
2. Matonick JP, Li JK-J: Pressure-dependent and frequency domain characteristics of the arterial system. Cardiovasc Eng 1: 21-29, 2001.
3. Latham RD, Westerhof N, Sipkema P, Rubal BJ, Reuderink P, Murgo JP: Regional wave travel and reflections along the human aorta: A study with six simultaneous micromanometric pressures. Circulation 72: 1257-1269, 1985.
4. Matonick JP, Li JK-J: A new nonuniform piecewise viscoelastic model of the aorta with propagation characteristics. Cardiovasc Eng 1: 37-47, 2001.
5. Ferrari G, DeLazzari CD, Kozarski M, et al: A hybrid mock circulatory system: Testing a prototype under physiological and pathological conditions. ASAIO J 48: 487-494, 2002.
6. Sharp MK, Dharmalingam RK: Development of a hydraulic model of the human systemic circulation. ASAIO J 45: 535-540, 1999.
7. Segers P, Dubois F, De Wachter D, Verdonck P: Role and relevancy of a cardiovascular simulator. Cardiovasc Eng 3: 48-56, 1998.
8. Wu ZJ, Gao BZ, Hwang NHC: Transient pressure at closing of a monoleaflet mechanical heart valve prothesis: Mounting compliance effect. J Heart Valve Dis 4: 553-567, 1995.
9. Jennings LM, Butterfield M, Walker PG, Watterson KG, Fisher J: The influence of ventricular input impedance on the hydrodynamic performance of bioprosthetic aortic roots in vitro. J Heart Valve Dis 10: 269-275, 2001.
10. Schaub JD, Koenig SC, Schroeder MJ, Ewert DL, Drew GA, Swope RD: Development of a flow feedback pulse duplicator system with rhesus monkey arterial input impedance characteristics. ASAIO J 45: 334-338, 1999.
11. Schichl K, Affeld K: Computer controlled versatile pulse duplicator for precision testing of artificial heart valves. Int J Artif Organs 16: 722-728, 1993.
12. Fisher J, Jack GR, Wheatley DJ: Design of a function test apparatus for prosthetic heart valves. Initial results in the mitral position. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 7: 63-73, 1986.
13. International Organization for Standardization. ISO 5840: Cardiovascular implants-Cardiac valve protheses. Third Edition 1996.
14. Murgo JP, Westerhof N, Giolma JP, Altobelli SA: Aortic input impedance in normal man: Relationship to pressure waveforms. Circulation 62: 107-116, 1980.
15. Nichols WW, Conti CR, Walker WE, Milnor WR: Input impedance of the arterial circulation in man. Circ Res 40: 451-458, 1977.
16. Higashidate M, Tamiya K, Beppu T, Imai Y: Regulation of the aortic valve opening. In vivo dynamic measurement of aortic valve orifice area. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 110: 496-503, 1995.
17. Thubrikar MJ, Heckman JL, Nolan SP: High speed cine-radiographic study of aortic valve leaflet motion. J Heart Valve Dis 2: 653-661, 1993.
18. Van Steenhoven AA, Verlaan CW, Veenstra PC, Reneman RS: In vivo cinematographic analysis of behaviour of the aortic valve. Am J Physiol 240: H286-292, 1981.
19. Laniado S, Yellin E, Terdiman R, Meytes I, Stadler J: Hemodynamic correlates of the normal aortic valve echogram. Circulation 54: 729-737, 1979.