A framework for multi-level stakeholder studies in response to global change

Local Environment

Volumn 9, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 425-435

  Keskitalo, E Carina H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LAPLAND   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLOBAL CHANGE; INTEGRATED APPROACH; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER;

EID: 4544357804     PISSN: 13549839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1354983042000255333     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Bostrom, A., Morgan, M. G., Fischhoff, B. & Read, D. (1994) What do people know about global climate change? 1. Mental models, Risk Analysis, 14(6), pp. 959-970.
2. Burton, I., Huq, S., Lim, B., Pilifosova, O. & Schipper, E. L. (2002) From impacts assessment to adaptation priorities: the shaping of adaptation policy, Climate Policy, 2(2-3), September 2002, pp. 145-159.
3. Bäckstrand, K. (2002) Civic science for sustainability. Reframing the role of scientific experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Paper presented at the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Knowledge for Sustainability Transition: The Challenge for Social Science Berlin, 6-7 December.
4. Bärlund, I. & Carter, T. R. (2002) Integrated global change scenarios: surveying user needs in Finland, Global Environmental Change, 12(3), October, pp. 219-229.
5. Cantor, R. & Yohe, G. (1998) Economic analysis, in: S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds) Human Choice and Climate Change, Volume Three: The tools for policy analysis (Columbus, OH, Battelle Press).
6. Cohen, S. J. (Ed.) (1997) MacKenzie Basin Impact Study Final Report (Downsview, ON, Environment Canada).
7. Cohen, S. J. (1999) Integration, synthesis, and the role of stakeholders in regional impact studies of climate change in the circumpolar north, in: M. A. Lange IRISEN Integrated Regional Impact Studies in the European North, Proceedings of an Advanced Study Course at Abisko Research Station, Sweden, on July 4-16, 1999 (Münster, Institute for Geophysics, University of Münster).
8. Davidson, D. J., Williamson, T. & Parkins, J. (2002) Climate change and risk perception in forest-based communities. Paper presented at the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Knowledge for Sustainability Transition: The Challenge for Social Science, Berlin, 6-7 December.
9. Dürrenberger, G., Kastenholz H. & Behringer, J. (1999) Integrated assessment focus groups: bridging the gap between science and policy? Science and Public Policy, 26(5), October, pp. 341-349.
10. Edelenbos, J., van Buuren, A. & Teisman, G. (2002) Sustainable development as a joint fact-finding process: overcoming institutional barriers through process management. Paper presented at the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Knowledge for Sustainability Transition: The Challenge for Social Science, Berlin, 6-7 December.
11. Fankhauser, S., Smith, J. B. & Tol, R. S. J. (1999) Weathering climate change: some simple rules to guide adaptation decisions, Ecological Economics, 30, pp. 67-78.
12. Fiorino, D. J. (1996) Environmental policy and the participation gap, in: W. M. Lafferty & J. Meadowcroft (Eds) Democracy and the Environment. Problems and Prospects (Edward Elgar, Cheltenham).
13. Gregory, R., Fischhoff, B., Thornec, S. & Buttec, G. (2003) A multi-channel stakeholder consultation process for transmission deregulation, Energy Policy, 31, pp. 1291-1299.
14. Hemmati, M. (2001) Multi-stakeholder Processes for Governance and Sustainability-beyond deadlock and conflict (London, Earthscan).
15. Hisschemöller, M. & Olsthoorn, A. A. (1999) Identifying barriers and opportunities for policy responses to changing climatic risks, in: T. E. Downing, A. J. Olsthoorn & R. S. J. Tol (Eds) Climate, Change and Risk (London and New York, Routledge).
16. IPCC (1998) The Regional Impacts of Climate Change. An Assessment of Vulnerability (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
17. IPCC (2001) Climate Change 2001: Mitigation. Contribution of Working Group III to the Third Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press). Full report available from
18. Irwin, A. (1995) Citizen Science. A Study of People, Expertise and Sustainable Development (London and New York, Routledge).
19. Jepma, C. J. & Munasinghe, M. (1998) Climate Change Policy. Facts, Issues, and Analyses (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
20. Jürgens, I. (2002) Science-stakeholder dialogue and climate change. Towards a participatory notion of communication. Paper presented at the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Knowledge for Sustainability Transition: The Challenge for Social Science, Berlin, 6-7 December.
21. Kasemir, B., Jaeger, C. C. & Jaeger, J. (2003) Citizen participation in sustainability assessments, in: B. Kasemir, C. C. Jaeger, J. Jaeger & M. T. Gardner (Eds) Public Participation in Sustainability Science. A Handbook (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
22. Kempton, W. (1991) Lay perspectives on global climate change, Global Environmental Change, 1, pp. 183-208.
23. Klein, R. J. T. & Nicholls, R. J. (1999) Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change, Ambio, 28(2), March, pp. 182-187.
24. Kok, K., Patel, M., Rothman, D. S. & Greeuw, S. (2002) First series of target area workshops. October-November 2002. Process and methodology. MedAction Deliverable #6, Working Paper 103-E002 (Maastricht, International Centre for Intergrative Studies ICIS).
25. Kuhry, P. & Lange, M. A. (1997) Assessing the consequences of global changes for the Barents region: the Barents Sea Impact Study (BASIS), in: S. J. Cohen, (Ed.) MacKenzie Basin Impact Study Final Report (Downsview, ON, Environment Canada).
26. Lange, M. (2001) The Barents Sea Impact Study (BASIS): methodology and first results. Submitted to the Proceedings of the ELOISE Open Science Meeting, Rende, Italy.
27. Mostert, E. (2002) The challenge of public participation, Water Policy, 5(2), pp. 179-197.
28. Myint, T. (2002) Managing complexities in global environmental governance: issues-interests-actors network model for the transnational environmental governance in the Mekong River Commission and the International Commission for the Protection of the Rhine, in: F. Bierman, R. Brohm & K. Dingwerth (Eds) Proceedings of the 2001 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change: Global Environmental Change and the Nation State, pp. 106-116 (Potsdam, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research).
29. Nichols, N. (2002) Participatory program planning: including program participants and evaluators, Evaluation and Program Planning, 25(1), February, pp. 1-14.
30. Nordic Council of Ministers (2002) Have a 'good participation'. Recommendations on public participation in forestry based on literature review and Nordic experiences, TemaNord 2002:515 (Copenhagen, Nordic Council of Ministers).
31. O'Brien, K. L. & Leichenko, R. M. (2000) Double exposure: assessing the impacts of climate change within the context of economic globalization, Global Environmental Change, 10, pp. 221-232.
32. O'Riordan, T. & Jordan, A. (1999) Institutions, climate change and cultural theory: towards a common analytical framework, Global Environmental Change, 9, pp. 81-93.
33. Paavola, J. & Adger, W. N. (2002) Knowledge or/and participation for sustainability? science, justice and environmental governance in adaptation to climate change. Paper presented at the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Knowledge for Sustainability Transition: The Challenge for Social Science, Berlin, 6-7 December.
34. Pahl-Wostl, C. (2002) Participative and stakeholder-based policy design, evaluation and modeling processes, Integrated Assessment, 3(1), pp. 3-14.
35. Paterson, M. (2002) Climate change and the politics of global risk society. Paper presented at the International Studies Association Annual Convention, New Orleans, 24-27 March.
36. Perron, B., Vaillancourt, J.-G. & Durand, C. (2001) A global problem for a global movement? An exploratory study of climate change perception by green groups' leaders from Quebec (Canada) and Costa Rica, Society and Natural Resources, 14, pp. 837-855.
37. Rayner, S. & Malone, E. L. (Eds) (1998) Human Choice and Climate Change. Volume Three: The Tools for Policy Analysis (Columbus, OH, Battelle Press).
38. Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. J. T. & Wandel, J. (2000) An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability, Climatic Change, 45, pp. 223-251.
39. Smit, B. & Skinner, M. W. (2002) Adaptation options in agriculture to climate change: a typology, Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 7, pp. 85-114.
40. Stedman, R. C., Davidson, D. J. & Wellstead, A. M. (2002) Risk and climate change-perceptions of policy-makers in Canada. Paper presented at the 2002 Berlin Conference on the Human Dimensions of Global Environmental Change, Knowledge for Sustainability Transition: The Challenge for Social Science, Berlin, 6-7 December.
41. Tol, R. S. J., Fankhauser, S. & Smith, J. B. (1998) The scope for adaptation to climate change: what can we learn from the impact literature? Global Environmental Change, 8(2), pp. 109-123.
42. UK Climate Impacts Programme (2001) Socio-economic scenarios for climate change impact assessment: a guide to their use in the UK Climate Impacts Programme. UKCIP, Oxford, accessed 9 April 2003 from .