ESys.Net: A new solution for embedded systems modeling and simulation

ACM SIGPLAN Notices

Volumn 39, Issue 7, 2004, Pages 107-114

  Lapalme, J ^a   Aboulhamid, E M ^a   Nicolescu, G ^b   Charest, L ^a   Boyer, F R ^b   David, J P ^a   Bois, G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

^b ÉCOLE POLYTECHNIQUE DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

.Net; Attribute programming; C ; C++; CIL; Component based programming; Embedded systems; ESys.Net; Framework; Hardware software codesign; HDLs; Java; Modeling; Simulation; System on Chip; SystemC; SystemVerilog; Verilog; VHDL

Indexed keywords

ABSTRACTING; ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER HARDWARE DESCRIPTION LANGUAGES; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; RELIABILITY; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEM PROGRAM DOCUMENTATION; SYSTEMS ANALYSIS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

ASYNCHRONOUS INTERACTION; MEMORY MANAGEMENT; VERIFICATION; WEB-BASED INTERACTION;

EMBEDDED SYSTEMS;

EID: 4544348858     PISSN: 03621340     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1145/998300.997179     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. ITRS, "International Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, Design", Edition 2001.
2. "SystemC, Version 2.0", http://www.systemc.org/.
3. Rich, D.I., "The evolution of SystemVerilog", IEEE Design & Test of Computers, Volume: 20 Issue: 4, July-August 2003
4. .Net Framework, http://www.microsoft.com/net, 2003
5. J. V. Newkirk, A.A., "How .Net's custom attributes affect design," IEEE Software vol. 19, pp. 18-20, 2002.
6. Extensible Markup Language (XML), available on line at http://www.w3.org/XML
7. "Comparison of VHDL, Verilog and System Verilog", http://www.bitpipe.com/
8. B. Albahari, "A Comparative Overview of C#", http://genamics.com/developer/csharp_comparative.htm, 2003
9. M. H. L. Lutz, P.A., "C# and the .Net framework: ready for real time?," IEEE Software, vol. 20, pp. 74-80, 2003
10. T. Grotker, "Modeling software with SystemC 3.0", http://www-ti.informatik.unituebingen.de/~systemc/ Documents/Presentation-6-OSCI5_groetker.pdf
11. "ECMA and ISO/IEC C# and Common Language Infrastructure Standards", http://msdn.microsoft.com/net/ecma/ISO/IEC 23270 to ISO/IEC 23272
12. G. Nicolescu, et al. "Validation in a Component-Based Design Flow for Multicore SoCs", ISSS' O2, Japan, October 2002.
13. M. Keating and P. Bricaud, "Reuse Methodology Manual", Kluwer Academic Publisher, 1999.
14. F. Doucet, S. Shukla, and R. Gupta, "Introspection in system-level language frameworks: meta-level vs. integrated," DATE, 2003.
15. A. Jerraya, R. Ernst, "Multi-language system design", DATE., 9-12 March 1999
16. M. Delpasso, A. Bogliolo, L. Benini, "Virtual Simulation of Distributed IP-Based Designs", DAC, June 1999
17. "SystemC in Europe - current usage and future requirements", http://www.doulos.com/systemc_report/
18. R.A. Kilgore, "Multi-language, open-source modeling using the Microsoft .Net archite", Winter Simulation Conference, Dec. 2002
19. Edward A. Lee and Steve Neuendorffer, "MoML - A Modeling Markup Language in XML, Version 0.4," Technical Memorandum UCB/ERL MOO/12, U. of California, Berkeley, 2000.
20. S. Yoo et al. "Building Fast and Accurate SW Simulation Models Based on Hardware Abstraction Layer and Simulation Environment Abstraction Layer", DATE'03, Munich, Germany, March 2003.
21. Synopsys, CoCentric® System Studio, 2001
22. A. Shankar "Implementing Coroutines for .Net by Wrapping the Unmanaged Fiber API" http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/03/09/Coroutine sinNET/default.aspx
23. Richard Goering, Researchers tap .Net, C# for system-level design, EETimes, December 2003