A framework for architecting peer-to-peer receiver-driven overlays

Proceedings of the International Workshop on Network and Operating System Support for Digital Audio and Video

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 42-47

  Rejaie, Reza ^a   Stafford, Shad ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

Congestion Control; Peer to Peer Streaming

Indexed keywords

BANDWIDTH; COMPUTER ARCHITECTURE; INTERNET; MULTICASTING; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SIGNAL RECEIVERS; TELECOMMUNICATION LINKS;

CONGESTION CONTROL; NATURAL SOLUTIONS; PEER-TO-PEER STREAMING; STRAWMAN SOLUTIONS;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 4544347492     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1005847.1005858     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. A. Akella, S. Seshan, and A. Shaikh. An empirical evaluation of wide-area internet bottlenecks. In Internet Measurement Conference, 2003.
2. S. Banerjee, B. Bhattacharjee, and C. Kommareddy. Scalable application layer multicast. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2002.
3. J. Byers, J. Considine, M. Mitzenmacher, and S. Rost. Informed Content Delivery Across Adaptive Overlay Networks. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2002.
4. M. Castro, P. Druschel, A.-M. Kermarrec, A. R. A. Nandi, and A. Singh. SplitStream: High-bandwidth content distribution in a cooperative environment. In ACM SOSP, 2003.
5. Y. Chawathe, S. Ratnasamy, L. Breslau, N. Lanham, and S. Shenker. Making gnutella-like p2p systems scalable. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2003.
6. Y. Chu, S. G. Rao, S. Seshan, and H. Zhang. Enabling conferencing applications on the internet using an overlay multicast architecture. In ACM SIGCOMM, 2001.
7. Y. Chu, S. G. Rao, and H. Zhang. A case for end-system multicast. In ACM SIGMETRICS, 2000.
8. S. Floyd, V. Jacobson, C. Liu, S. McCanne, and L. Zhang. Reliable Multicast Framework for Light-Weight Sessions and Application Level Framing. ACM/IEEE Transactions on Networking, 1997.
9. M. Harchol-Balter, F. T. Leighton, and D. Lewin. Resource discovery in distributed networks. In Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pages 229-237, 1999.
10. S. Hedetniemi, S. Hedetniemi, and A. Liestman. A Survey of Gossiping and Broadcasting in Communication Networks. In Networks, 1988.
11. D. Kostic, A. Rodriguez, J. Albrecht, and A. Vahdat. Bullet: High bandwidth data dissemination using an overlay mesh. In SOSP, 2003.
12. K. Lakshminarayanan and V. N. Padmanabhan. Some findings on the network performance of broadband hosts. In Internet Measurement Conference, 2003.
13. S. McCanne, V. Jacobson, and M. Vettereli. Receiver-driven layered multicast. In ACM SIGCOMM, 1996.
14. T. S. E. Ng, Y. Chu, S. G. Rao, K. Sripanidkulchai, and H. Zhang. Measurement-based optimization techniques for bandwidth-demanding peer-to-peer systems. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.
15. T. S. E. Ng and H. Zhang. Predicting internet network distance with coordinates-based approaches. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2002.
16. V. N. Padmanabhan, H. J. Wang, and P. A. Chou. Resilient peer-to-peer streaming. In IEEE ICNP, 2003.
17. R. Rejaie, M. Handley, and D. Estrin. RAP: An end-to-end rate-based congestion control mechanism for realtime streams in the internet. In IEEE INFOCOM, 1999.
18. R. Rejaie and A. Ortega. PALS: Peer-to-Peer Adaptive Layered Streaming. In NOSSDAV, 2003.
19. S. Saroiu, P. K. Gummadi, and S. D. Gribble Measurement study of peer-to-peer file system sharing. In SPIE MMCN, 2002.
20. D. A. Tran, K. A. Hua, and T. Do. Zigzag: An efficient peer-to-peer scheme for media streaming. In IEEE INFOCOM, 2003.