A robust fleet-assignment model with hub isolation and short cycles

Transportation Science

Volumn 38, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 357-368

  Rosenberger, Jay M ^a   Johnson, Ellis L ^b   Nemhauser, George L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT ARLINGTON   (United States)

^b Georgia Institute of Technology   (United States)

Author keywords

Air transportation; Fleet assignment; Hub insolation; Integer programming; Robust planning

Indexed keywords

INTEGER PROGRAMMING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; OPERATIONS RESEARCH; PLANNING; SCHEDULING;

FLEET ASSIGNMENT; HUB ISOLATION; ROBUST PLANNING; SHORT CYCLES;

AIR TRANSPORTATION;

EID: 4544344424     PISSN: 00411655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1287/trsc.1030.0038     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Ageeva, Y. 2000. Approaches to Incorporating Robustness into Airline Scheduling. Master's thesis, Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
2. AirTran. 2000. Route map. www.airtran.com/routemap.
3. Barnhart, C., N. Boland, L. Clarke, E. L. Johnson, G. L. Nemhauser. 1998. Flight string models for aircraft fleeting and routing. Transportation Sci. 32 208-220.
4. Clarke, L. W., E. L. Johnson, G. L. Nemhauser, Z. Zhu. 1997. The aircraft rotation problem, annals of operations research. Math. Indus. Systems II 69
5. Clarke, M. D. D. 1997. The airline schedule recovery problem. Technical report, Operations Research Center, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA.
6. Ehrgott, M., David M. Ryan. 2003. Constructing robust crew schedules with bicriteria optimization. J. Multi-Criteria Decision Anal. Forthcoming.
7. Hane, C. A., C. Barnhart, E. L. Johnson, R. E. Marsten, G. L. Nemhauser, G. C. Sigismondi. 1995. The fleet assignment problem: Solving a large integer program. Math. Programming 70 211-232.
8. Klabjan, D., A. J. Schaefer, E. L. Johnson, A. J. Kleywegt, G. L. Nemhauser. 2001. Robust airline crew scheduling. Proc. Triennial Sympos. Transportation Anal. (TRISTAN IV), Sao Miguel, Azores Islands, Portugal, 275-280.
9. Lunsford, J. L. 2000. Airlines defend tight scheduling. The Dallas Morning News (September 13) 1A.
10. Rosenberger, J. M., J. Michael. 2001. Topics in airline operations. Ph.D. thesis, School of Industrial and Systems Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
11. Rosenberger, J. M., E. L. Johnson, G. L. Nemhauser. 2001. Rerouting aircraft for airline recovery. Technical Report TLI/LEC-01-04, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
12. Rosenberger, J. M., A. J. Schaefer, D. Goldsman, E. L. Johnson, A. J. Kleywegt, G. L. Nemhauser. 2000. A stochastic model of airline operations. Technical Report TLI/LEC-00-06b, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA. Transportation Sci. Forthcoming.
13. Rosenberger, J. M., A. J. Schaefer, D. Goldsman, E. L. Johnson, A. J. Kleywegt, G. L. Nemhauser. 2002. A stochastic model of airline operations. Transportation Sci. 364 357-377.
14. Schaefer, A. J. 2000. Airline crew scheduling under uncertainty. Ph.D. thesis, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
15. Schaefer, A. J., E. L. Johnson, A. J. Kleywegt, G. L. Nemhauser. 2001. Airline crew scheduling under uncertainty. Technical Report TLI/LEC-01-01, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA.
16. Yen, J., J. Birge. 2000. A stochastic programming approach to the airline crew scheduling problem. Technical report, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.
17. Yung, K. 2000. American seeks to reduce delays. The Dallas Morning News (September 13) 1A.