Do the marginalised class really participate in community forestry? A case study from western terai region of Nepal

Forests Trees and Livelihoods

Volumn 14, Issue 2-4, 2004, Pages 137-147

  Gauli, K ^a   Rishi, P ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF FOREST MANAGEMENT   (India)

Author keywords

Conservation; Decision making; Equity; Forest management; Institution building

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY FORESTRY; DECISION MAKING; FOREST MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL STRUCTURE;

ASIA; EURASIA; SOUTH ASIA; TARAI;

EID: 4544332641     PISSN: 14728028     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14728028.2004.9752488     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Barai, J. C., and Subedi, B. R., 1999. Is Community Forestry of Nepal's Terai is in right direction?. Banko Janakari, 9 (2):20–24.
2. Bushley, B., 2002. Users Perceptions of The Impacts of Community forestry on Community Development in Nepal?s Western Terai Region, CARE, Nepal
3. CFD. 2002. Database of the Community Forest Users Groups in Nepal. Community Forestry Division, Department of Forests, Nepal
4. Cohen, J. M., and Uphoff, M. T., 1977. Rural Development Participation:Concept and Mechanism for Project Design, Implementation and evaluation. Rural Development committee, Center for International Studies, Cormell University
5. Dahal, S. P., 1994. Building people's participation in management in the hills of Nepal:A review of forest policies of Nepal, Issues and methods of Participation. MA Thesis submitted to University of Reading
6. Dfid. 1995. Stakeholder Participation and Analysis. Social Development Division, DFID, 94, Victoria Street, London
7. Graner, E., 1997. The Political Ecology of Community Forestry in Nepal., 340 Saarbrucken:Verl, Fur Entwicklungspolitik
8. Hunt, M., 1996. “ The New institution ”. In Participatory Forestry:The Process of Change in India and Nepal Edited by:Hobley, M., London, UK:Rural Development Forestry Study Guide 3 Rural Development Forestry Network. Overseas Development Institute.
9. Kuwar, R. M., 2001. Participation and Benefits to Rural People in Community Forestry:A case from Makawanpur District, Central Nepal. M. Phil Thesis submitted to Indian Institute of Forest Management, Bhopal, India
10. Lama, A., and Buchy, M., 2002. Gender, Class, Caste and Participation:the Case of Community forestry in Nepal. Indieni Journal of Gender Studies, 9:27–39.
11. Neupane, H., 2003. Contested Impact of Community Forestry on Equity:Some Evidences from Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood, 2 (2):55–61.
12. Nightingale, A. J., 2002. Participating or Just sitting In? The Dynamics of Gender and Caste in Community Forestry. Journal of forest and livelihood, 2 (1):34–41.
13. Paudel, L. P., and Weber, K. E., 1993. People Participation:Some methods for measuring intensities across the development sectors. Asia-Pacific Journal Development, 3 (2):1–18.
14. Paudel, S. K., 2000. Implementing Community Forestry in the Terai Region of Nepal:How, Where and with Whom, M. Sc. Thesis submitted to ITC, Netherlands
15. Pokhrel, B. K., 2002. Contribution of Community Forestry to People's Livelihoods and Forest Sustainability:Experience from Nepal. Site http://www.wrm.org.uy/countries/Asia/Nepal.html
16. Raju, S. M., 1997. Seeking Niches in Forest Canopy. An Enquiry into Women's Participation. The Ford Foundation, New Delhi
17. Sarin, M., 1998. “ Grassroots Initiative versus official Responses:The Dilemmas facing Community Forestry Management in India, In Proceeding of an International Seminar hold in Bankok. Community Forestry at a Crossroads:”. In Reflections and Future Directions in the Development of Community Forestry, RECOFTEC No. 16 Edited by:Victor, M., Lang, C., and Bornemeier, J., Thailand:Bangkok. Thiland 17–19th July 1997
18. Subedi, B. P., Das, C. L., and Messerschmidt, D. A., 2000. “ Tree and Land Tenure in the Estern Terai, Nepal:A case Study from the Siraha and Saptari District. Nepal ”. In Community Forestry Case study series, 9, FAO