Mathematical methods in combatting terrorism

Risk Analysis

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 985-988

  Harris, Bernard ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

Author keywords

Counter terrorism; Mathematical methods; Statistical methods

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; GAME THEORY; LAW ENFORCEMENT; PROBABILITY; STATISTICAL METHODS;

REPORTS; TERRORISM;

RISK MANAGEMENT;

LAW ENFORCEMENT; NUMERICAL METHOD; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; TERRORISM;

GAME; INTELLIGENCE; MATHEMATICAL ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR REACTOR; PLANNING; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; STATISTICS; TERRORISM; WORK;

EID: 4544332530     PISSN: 02724332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00501.x     Document Type: Review

References (5)

1. Reactor Safety Study, WASH-1400. (1975). Washington, DC: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
2. Lewis, R. W., et al. (1978). Risk Assessment Review Group Report to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. NUREG-CR-0400, Washington, DC.
3. PRA Procedures Guide. (1982). NUREG/CR-2300. Washington, DC: Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
4. Bedford, T., & Cooke R. (2001). Probabilistic Risk Analysis: Foundations and Methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Deutsche Risiko Studie-Kernkraftwerke. (3 volumes). (1981). Unfallfolgenberechnung und Risikoergebnisse, Zuverlässigkeitsanalyse, Zuverlássigkeitsdaten und Betriebserfahrungen, Gesellschaft für Reaktorsicherheit mbH, Köln, BRD.