Critical micellar concentrations for three surfactants and their diesel-removal efficiencies in petroleum-contaminated soils

Environmental Geosciences

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 28-36

  Torres, Luis G ^a   Orantes, José Luis ^a   Iturbe, Rosario ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DIESEL; PETROLEUM HYDROCARBON; REMEDIATION; SOIL POLLUTION; SURFACTANT;

TRIXIS;

EID: 4544316666     PISSN: 10759565     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1306/eg100102008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Atay, N. Z., O. Yenigun, and M. Asutay, 2002, Sorption of anionic surfactants SDS, AOT and cationic surfactant Hyamine 1622 on natural soils: Water, Air and Soil Pollution, v. 136, p. 55-67.
2. Attwood, D., and A. T. Florence, 1983, in Surfactants systems: Their chemistry, pharmacy and biology: New York, Chapman and Hall, p. 345-450.
3. Butler, E., and K. F. Hayes, 1998, Micellar solubilization of non-aqueous phase liquid contaminants by nonionic surfactant mixtures: Effects of sorption, partitioning and mixing: Water Research, v. 32, no. 5, p. 1345-1354.
4. Calabrase, E. J., and P. T. Kostecki, 1991, Hydrocarbon contaminated soils: U.S.A., Lewis Publishers, v. 1. p. 149-164, 167-178.
5. Chu, W., and W. S. So, 2001, Modeling two stages of surfactant aided soil washing: Water Research, v. 35, no. 3, p. 761-767.
6. Deshpande, S., B. J. Shiau, D. Wade, D. A. Sabatini, and J. H. Harwell, 1999, Surfactant selection for enhancing ex situ soil washing: Water Research, v. 33, no. 2, p. 351-360.
7. Deshpande, S., L. Wesson, D. Wade, D. A. Sabatini, and J. H. Harwell, 2000, Dowfax surfactant components for enhancing contaminant solubilization: Water Research, v. 34, no. 3, p. 1030-1036.
8. Freeze, R. A., and J. A. Cherry, 1979, Groundwater: New Jersey, Prentice-Hall, p. 402-407.
9. Gandoy, B. W., 1992, Manual de laboratorio, para el manejo físico de suelos, Departamento de suelos: Universidad Autónoma de Chapingo, México, 111 p.
10. Iturbe, R., R. M. Flores, C. Flores, and L. Torres, 2003, TPH-contaminated Mexican-refinery soil: Health risk assessment and the first year of changes: Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, in press.
11. McMillen, S., I. Rhodes, D. V. Nakles, and R. E. Sweeney, 2001, Application of the Total Petroleum Hydrocarbon Criteria Working Group (TPHCWG) methodology to crude oils and gas condensates, in S. J. McMillen, R. I. Magaw, and R. L. Carovillano, eds., Risk-based decision-making for assessing petroleum impacts at exploration and production sites: U.S.A. Petroleum Environmental Research Foundation and The United States Department of Energy, p. 58-76.
12. Roote, D. S., 1997, In situ flushing: Ground Water Remediation Center Technologies Analysis Center, Ground-Water Remediation Technologies Analysis Center TO-97-02, Pittsburg, Pennsylvania, 16 p.
13. Schnoor, J. L., 1996, Fate and transport of pollutants in water, air and soil, in Environmental modeling: United States, John Wiley and Sons.
14. Soil Science Society of America (SSSA), 1996, Methods of soil analysis, part 3: Chemical methods, SSSA Books Series 5, U.S.A., 1390 p.
15. Sun, X., and R. K. Puri, 2002. Surfactant-enhanced solubility and mobility of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in soil, in Proceedings of the Hazardous Substance Research Center: (http:// www.engg.ksu.edu/HSRC/97Proceed/Remediation-4/surfactant. html)
16. Zhang, Z., and J. P. Obbard, 2002, Evaluation of an elevated conionic surfactant critical micelle concentration in a soil-aqueous system: Water Research, v. 36, p. 2667-2672.