Highly cited old papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Part II. The 1953 Watson and Crick article on the structure of DNA

Scientometrics

Volumn 61, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 147-156

  Ahmed, Tanzila ^a   Johnson, Ben ^a   Oppenheim, Charles ^a   Peck, Catherine ^a  

^a LOUGHBOROUGH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544312313     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:SCIE.0000041645.60907.57     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. ALVAREZ, P., ESCALONA, I., PULGARIN, A. (2000), What is wrong with obsolescence? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (9): 812-815.
2. BAIRD, L., OPPENHEIM, C. (1994), Do citations matter? Journal of Information Science, 20 (1): 2-15.
3. BROOKS, T. A. (1985), Private acts and public objects: an investigation of citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 36 (4), 223-229.
4. BROOKS, T. A. (1986), Evidence of complex citer motivations. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 37 (1): 34-36.
5. CANO, V. (1989), Citation behaviour: classification, utility, and location. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (4): 284-290.
6. CASE, D. O., HIGGINS, G. M. (2000), How can we investigate citation behaviour? A study of reasons for citing literature in communication. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 51 (7): 635-645.
7. CHUBIN, D. E., MOITRA, S. D. (1975), Content analysis of references: adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5: 423-441.
8. CRONIN, B. (1984), The Citation Process: Taylor Graham.
9. GARFIELD, E. (1979), Citation Indexing - Its Theory and application in Science, Technology and Humanities. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
10. MACROBERTS, M. H., MACROBERTS, B. R. (1989), Problems of citation analysis: A critical review. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 40 (5): 342-349.
11. MOED, H. F. (2002), The Impact Factors debate: ISI's uses and limitations. Nature, 415: 731-732.
12. MORAVCSIK, M. J., MURUGESAN, P. (1975), Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science, 5: 86-92.
13. OPPENHEIM, C. (1995), The correlation between citation counts and the 1992 Research Assessment ratings for British library and information science university departments. Journal of Documentation, 51 (1): 18-27.
14. OPPENHEIM, C., RENN, S. P. (1978), Highly cited papers and the reasons why they continue to be cited. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 29: 225-231.
15. SENG, L. B., WILLETT, P. (1995), The citedness of publications by United Kingdom library schools. Journal of Information Science, 21 (1): 68-71.
16. SIMKIN, M. V., ROYCHOWDHURY, V. P. (2003), Read Before You Cite! Retrieved March 31, 2003, from the World Wide Web: http://arxiv.org/ftp/cond- mat/papers/0212/0212043.pdf
17. SNYDER, H., BONZI, S. (1998), Patterns of self-citation across disciplines (1980-1989). Journal of Information Science, 24 (6): 431-435.
18. TAYLOR, J. (1995), A statistical analysis of the 1992 research assessment exercise. Journal of the Royal Statisical Society, 158 (2): 241-261.
19. WARNER, J. (2000), A critical review of the application of citation studies to the Research Assessment Exercises. Journal of Information Science, 26 (6): 453-160.
20. WATSON, J. D., CRICK, F. H. C. (1953), A structure for Deoxyribose Nucleic Acid. Nature, 171 (4356): 737-738.