Effects of differentially time-consuming tests on computer-adaptive test scores

Journal of Educational Measurement

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 137-148

  Bridgeman, Brent ^a   Cline, Frederick ^a  

^a EDUCATIONAL TESTING SERVICE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4544309331     PISSN: 00220655     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-3984.2004.tb01111.x     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Bridgeman, B., & Cline, F. (2000). Variations in mean response times for questions on the computer-adaptive GRE General Test: Implications for fair assessment. (GRE Report No. 96-20P; ETS RR-00-7). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
2. Briel, J. B., O'Neill, K. A., & Scheuneman, J. D. (1993). GRE technical manual. Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
3. Hambleton, R. K., & Swaminathan, H. (1985). Item response theory: Principles and applications. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff.
4. Schaeffer, G. A., Bridgeman, B., Golub-Smith, M. L., Lewis, C., Potenza, M. T., & Steffen, M., (1998). Comparability of paper-and-pencil and computer adaptive test scores on the GRE General Test. (GRE Report No. 95-08P; ETS RR-98-38).
5. Schaeffer, G. A., Steffen, M., Golub-Smith, M. L., Mills, C. N., & Durso, R. (1995). The introduction and comparability of the computer adaptive GRE General Test. (GRE Report No. 88-08aP; ETS RR-95-29).
6. Schnipke, D. L., & Scrams, D. J. (1997). Modeling item response times with a two-state mixture model: A new method of measuring speededness. Journal of Educational Measurement, 34, 213-232.
7. Steffen, M., & Way, W. D. (1999, April). Test-taking strategies in computer adaptive testing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education, Montreal.
8. Wilson, K. M. (1985). The relationship of GRE General Test item-type part scores to undergraduate grades. (GRE Board Professional Report GREB No. 81-22P; ETS RR-84-38). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.